Literature DB >> 21357819

Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy by QRS Morphology in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).

Wojciech Zareba1, Helmut Klein, Iwona Cygankiewicz, W Jackson Hall, Scott McNitt, Mary Brown, David Cannom, James P Daubert, Michael Eldar, Michael R Gold, Jeffrey J Goldberger, Ilan Goldenberg, Edgar Lichstein, Heinz Pitschner, Mayer Rashtian, Scott Solomon, Sami Viskin, Paul Wang, Arthur J Moss.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether QRS morphology identifies patients who benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) and whether it influences the risk of primary and secondary end points in patients enrolled in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT) trial. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Baseline 12-lead ECGs were evaluated with regard to QRS morphology. Heart failure event or death was the primary end point of the trial. Death, heart failure event, ventricular tachycardia, and ventricular fibrillation were secondary end points. Among 1817 patients with available sinus rhythm ECGs at baseline, there were 1281 (70%) with left bundle-branch block (LBBB), 228 (13%) with right bundle-branch block, and 308 (17%) with nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbances. The latter 2 groups were defined as non-LBBB groups. Hazard ratios for the primary end point for comparisons of CRT-D patients versus patients who only received an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were significantly (P < 0.001) lower in LBBB patients (0.47; P < 0.001) than in non-LBBB patients (1.24; P = 0.257). The risk of ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or death was decreased significantly in CRT-D patients with LBBB but not in non-LBBB patients. Echocardiographic parameters showed significantly (P < 0.001) greater reduction in left ventricular volumes and increase in ejection fraction with CRT-D in LBBB than in non-LBBB patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Heart failure patients with New York Heart Association class I or II and ejection fraction ≤ 30% and LBBB derive substantial clinical benefit from CRT-D: a reduction in heart failure progression and a reduction in the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. No clinical benefit was observed in patients with a non-LBBB QRS pattern (right bundle-branch block or intraventricular conduction disturbances). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00180271.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21357819     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.960898

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  163 in total

Review 1.  Updates in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Chronic Heart Failure: Review of Multisite Pacing.

Authors:  Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2017-10

Review 2.  Informed consent in cardiac resynchronization therapy: what should be said?

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Dan W Brock; Usha B Tedrow
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-09

3.  Can cardiac resynchronization therapy cause harm?

Authors:  John E Sanderson; Cheuk-Man Yu
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Cardiac dyssynchrony: we have the tools. It is time to use them.

Authors:  Steven Port
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Acute and chronic response to CRT in narrow QRS patients.

Authors:  Tim Donahue; Imran Niazi; Angel Leon; Michael Stucky; Keith Herrmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 6.  Effect of QRS morphology on clinical event reduction with cardiac resynchronization therapy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ilke Sipahi; Josephine C Chou; Marshall Hyden; Douglas Y Rowland; Daniel I Simon; James C Fang
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Mechanical Dyssynchrony: A Risk Factor but not a Target.

Authors:  Amil M Shah; Scott D Solomon
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 29.983

8.  Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients without left intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Authors:  Dominique Auger; Gabe B Bleeker; Matteo Bertini; See H Ewe; Rutger J van Bommel; Tomasz G Witkowski; Arnold C T Ng; Lieselot van Erven; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  Novel measure of electrical dyssynchrony predicts response in cardiac resynchronization therapy: Results from the SMART-AV Trial.

Authors:  Larisa G Tereshchenko; Alan Cheng; Jason Park; Nicholas Wold; Timothy E Meyer; Michael R Gold; Suneet Mittal; Jagmeet Singh; Kenneth M Stein; Kenneth A Ellenbogen
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 6.343

Review 10.  Devices in the management of advanced, chronic heart failure.

Authors:  William T Abraham; Sakima A Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.