Literature DB >> 31531281

The Utility of Preoperative Neuromonitoring for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Sohrab Virk1, Jan Klamar2, Allan Beebe2, Debabrata Ghosh3, Walter Samora1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring is well established and widely used to assist in completing corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) safely. The role of preoperative measurement of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to determine if there is transpinal pathology, however, is not clear. We sought to determine if preoperative SSEP and/or TMS measurement provided clinical benefit to patients with AIS.
METHODS: A review of medical charts between 2010 and 2012 was conducted for patients undergoing surgery for scoliosis. Patients with diagnoses other than AIS were excluded. Patients with incomplete preoperative or intraoperative data were also excluded. Relevant clinical information such as age, sex, number of levels fused, and major Cobb angle were recorded. Preoperative neuromonitoring measurements and intraoperative neuromonitoring results were reviewed by an attending neurologist. Any instance in which an intraoperative surgical plan or neuromonitoring result interpretation was influenced by preoperative results was recorded. Further imaging obtained based on preoperative results was noted. Any acute neurologic complication such as paralysis was noted.
RESULTS: Eighty-one patients met inclusion criteria (64 female, 17 male). Average age was 15 years (± 1.92). Major Cobb angle at preoperative evaluation averaged 57.5 degrees (± 10.81 degrees). Ten patients had abnormal preoperative SSEP/TMS results. There were no changes in protocol during intraoperative neuromonitoring based upon preoperative neuromonitoring findings. No additional imaging was required for patients with abnormal preoperative neuromonitoring results. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative Cobb angle between the group of patients with abnormal preoperative neuromonitoring and those with normal baseline testing.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative SSEP/TMS measurement prior to corrective surgery for AIS has limited utility. There were no instances in which a patient's clinical course was improved by testing. We recommend against routine use of preoperative SSEP/TMS testing for AIS patients requiring corrective surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SSEPs; TMS; adolescent; idiopathic scoliosis; neuromonitoring

Year:  2019        PMID: 31531281      PMCID: PMC6724753          DOI: 10.14444/6043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  11 in total

Review 1.  Demonstrating the value of orthopaedic surgery through multicenter trials: AOA critical issues.

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Kurt Spindler; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey.

Authors:  E G Dawson; J E Sherman; L E Kanim; M R Nuwer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  SSEP analysis in surgery of idiopathic scoliosis: the influence of spine deformity and surgical approach.

Authors:  Oliver Hausmann; Kan Min; Thomas Böni; Thomas Erni; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: does it make a difference?

Authors:  Michael G Fehlings; Darrel S Brodke; Daniel C Norvell; Joseph R Dettori
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Factors related to false- versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  Kenneth J Noonan; Timothy Walker; Judy R Feinberg; Michelle Nagel; William Didelot; Richard Lindseth
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  What would be the annual cost savings if fewer screws were used in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treatment in the US?

Authors:  A Noelle Larson; David W Polly; Stacey J Ackerman; Charles G T Ledonio; Baron S Lonner; Suken A Shah; John B Emans; B Stephens Richards
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-09-18

7.  Effects of bracing in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; James G Wright; Matthew B Dobbs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Stuart L Weinstein; Lori A Dolan; Jack C Y Cheng; Aina Danielsson; Jose A Morcuende
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Reversible Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring Alerts in Patients Undergoing Arthrodesis for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Are the Outcomes of Surgery?

Authors:  Amer F Samdani; James T Bennett; Robert J Ames; Jahangir K Asghar; Giuseppe Orlando; Joshua M Pahys; Burt Yaszay; Firoz Miyanji; Baron S Lonner; Ronald A Lehman; Peter O Newton; Patrick J Cahill; Randal R Betz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Preoperative radiological and electrophysiological evaluation in 100 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  Oliver N Hausmann; Thomas Böni; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Armin Curt; Kan Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.