Phosphorylation of Glutamine Synthetase on Threonine 301
Contributes to Its Inactivation During EpilepsyHuyghe D, Denninger AR, Voss CM, et al. Front Mol
Neurosci. 2019;12:120. doi:10.3389/fnmol.2019.00120.
eCollection 2019. PMID: 31178690.The astrocyte-specific enzyme glutamine synthetase (GS), which catalyzes
the amidation of glutamate to glutamine, plays an essential role in
supporting neurotransmission and in limiting NH4
+ toxicity. Accordingly, deficits in GS activity contribute
to epilepsy and neurodegeneration. Despite its central role in brain
physiology, the mechanisms that regulate GS activity are poorly defined.
Here, we demonstrate that GS is directly phosphorylated on threonine
residue 301 (T301) within the enzyme’s active site by cAMP-dependent
protein kinase (protein kinase A). Phosphorylation of T301 leads to a
dramatic decrease in glutamine synthesis. Enhanced T301 phosphorylation
was evident in a mouse model of epilepsy, which may contribute to the
decreased GS activity seen during this trauma. Thus, our results
highlight a novel molecular mechanism that determines GS activity under
both normal and pathological conditions.
Commentary
Glutamine synthetase (GS, glutamate-ammonia ligase, E.C. 6.3.1.2), which catalyzes
the condensation of ammonia and glutamate to glutamine, is a fascinating enzyme
because of its ancient origin, ubiquitous presence in nature, and emerging
involvement in several diseases, including epilepsy. GS is encoded by one of the
oldest genes known to exist, likely originating more than 3500 million years ago in
the “pre-prokaryotic” era, that is, the period between the origin of life and the
divergence of prokaryotes and eukaryotes.[1] Moreover, all extant organisms express GS, and absent or reduced enzyme
levels are respectively deadly, or sometimes associated with a variety of
pathological conditions such as Alzheimer disease,[2] schizophrenia,[3] and epilepsy.[4-7] Even though GS is widely distributed in nature, the expression in mammals is
restricted to a surprisingly small number of cell types. In the central nervous
system, for instance, GS is almost exclusively found in astrocytes[8] and is thought to play a critical role in ammonia detoxification and in
regulation of the excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters glutamate and
γ-aminobutyric acid (reviewed in the study by Eid et al[9]).Severe loss-of-function mutations of the GS gene are often associated with
considerable mortality and morbidity, and the small number of humans reported with
such mutations have suffered from multi-organ failure, encephalopathy, and epilepsy.[10] In line with these observations, transgenic mice with complete loss of GS
activity are embryonic lethal,[11] and mice with brain-restricted GS loss die 3 days after birth,[12] suggesting that a critical level of GS activity is necessary for life. In
contrast, an increasing number of studies have suggested that incomplete
deficiencies in GS are relatively common, compatible with life, and sometimes
associated with dysfunction and disease. For example, the activity of GS is
partially reduced in the epileptogenic hippocampal formation in humans with
refractory mesial temporal lobe epilepsy,[4,7] in the amygdala in some patients with refractory neocortical epilepsies,[6] and in the neoplastic tissue in some patients with glioblastoma-associated epilepsy.[5] Furthermore, chemical inhibition or genetic deletion of GS focally in the
hippocampus and neocortex of rodents causes epileptic seizures and neuropathological
changes similar to humanmesial temporal lobe epilepsy,[13,14] suggesting that a partial reduction in brain GS activity is sufficient to
cause epilepsy. Thus, it has been proposed that preventing or reversing the brain GS
deficiency could potentially be used to treat epilepsy. However, effective
approaches have been lagging partly because the molecular mechanisms of the GS
deficiency are incompletely understood.Using carefully designed in vitro and in vivo approaches, Huyghe and colleagues
report here that phosphorylation of GS near the active site of the enzyme, on
threonine 301 (T301), contributes to the enzyme inactivation during epilepsy.[15] MammalianGS is a homomeric decamer protein comprising 2 stacked pentameric
rings with 5 identical, active sites.[16] By reviewing the protein sequence of the murine and human isoforms of the
enzyme, the authors discovered 2 consensus sites for protein kinase A
(PKA)–dependent phosphorylation on T301 and serine 343 (S343), near the active site
of the enzyme.To assess whether phosphorylation of GS regulates the enzyme activity, the authors
first created several mutated versions of mouseGS and showed that substitution of
threonine on 301 with alanine completely abolished GS phosphorylation, indicating
that T301 is the primary phosphorylation site of PKA-mediated phosphorylation of GS
in vitro. Next, using a combination of enzyme kinetic studies, mass spectrometry,
and site-directed mutagenesis, the authors showed that PKA-mediated phosphorylation
of GS led to an approximately 40% reduction in enzyme activity in vitro and that
phosphorylation of T301 accounted for the majority of this reduction.To determine whether GS phosphorylation also occurs in the normal brain in vivo, the
authors first purified GS from mouse brain extracts using immunoprecipitation and
then analyzed the purified GS by mass spectrometry, which revealed 2 phosphorylated
protein segments from the purified GS protein. Using additional confirmatory assays,
the authors demonstrated that mouse brain GS is phosphorylated at T301 and S343, as
predicted from the in vitro experiments, but that phosphorylation of T301 has the
highest impact on GS activity.Finally, the authors used the systemic kainic acidmouse approach (a commonly used
model of status epilepticus and subsequent mesial temporal lobe epilepsy) to
determine whether a 60-minute episode of status epilepticus would cause
phosphorylation of GS and reduced activity. Intriguingly, T301 phosphorylation, but
not S343 phosphorylation, was significantly increased in the hippocampus in the
seizing animals versus saline-injected controls. Moreover, the increased
phosphorylation was accompanied by an approximately 25% reduction in hippocampal GS
activity.Taken together, the studies by Huyghe and colleagues are of potentially high
translational relevance because they demonstrate a novel molecular mechanism by
which brain GS may lose its activity in some of the most common forms of epilepsy.
Although additional studies are needed to test for this mechanism in the brain of
patients with GS-deficient epilepsies, the results are encouraging and suggest that
PKA inhibition may have a role in preventing and treating epilepsy as well as other
conditions associated with GS inhibition.
Authors: Marc Steffens; Hans-Jürgen Huppertz; Josef Zentner; Emmanuelle Chauzit; Thomas J Feuerstein Journal: Neurochem Int Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: C D Smith; J M Carney; P E Starke-Reed; C N Oliver; E R Stadtman; R A Floyd; W R Markesbery Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1991-12-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Youji He; Theodorus B M Hakvoort; Jacqueline L M Vermeulen; Wilhelmina T Labruyère; D Rudi De Waart; W Saskia Van Der Hel; Jan M Ruijter; Harry B M Uylings; Wouter H Lamers Journal: Glia Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 7.452
Authors: W S van der Hel; R G E Notenboom; I W M Bos; P C van Rijen; C W M van Veelen; P N E de Graan Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-01-25 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Johannes Häberle; Boris Görg; Frank Rutsch; Eva Schmidt; Annick Toutain; Jean-François Benoist; Antoinette Gelot; Annie-Laure Suc; Wolfgang Höhne; Freimut Schliess; Dieter Häussinger; Hans G Koch Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-11-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Amy E Steffek; Robert E McCullumsmith; Vahram Haroutunian; James H Meador-Woodruff Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2008-06-17 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Y Kumada; D R Benson; D Hillemann; T J Hosted; D A Rochefort; C J Thompson; W Wohlleben; Y Tateno Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1993-04-01 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: T Eid; M J Thomas; D D Spencer; E Rundén-Pran; J C K Lai; G V Malthankar; J H Kim; N C Danbolt; O P Ottersen; N C de Lanerolle Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-01-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Youji He; Theodorus B M Hakvoort; Jacqueline L M Vermeulen; Wouter H Lamers; Maria A Van Roon Journal: Dev Dyn Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.780