Reshaping polymersomes remains a challenge for both size and shape control, methodology development, and mechanism understanding, which hindered their application in nanomedicine and nanomachine. Unlike liposome, polymersomes are capable of maintaining their shape due to their rigid and glassy membrane. Here we use the Hofmeister effect to guide the shape control of polymersome by tuning the ion type and concentration. Multiple morphologies such as ellipsoid, tube, disc, stomatocytes, and large compound vesicles are found. These results give evidence of demonstrating that the shape changes are not only induced by osmotic pressure, but also by the interaction with the polymersome membranes. Additionally, this methodology provides a general tool to tailor the shape of polymersome into various morphologies.
Reshaping polymersomes remains a challenge for both size and shape control, methodology development, and mechanism understanding, which hindered their application in nanomedicine and nanomachine. Unlike liposome, polymersomes are capable of maintaining their shape due to their rigid and glassy membrane. Here we use the Hofmeister effect to guide the shape control of polymersome by tuning the ion type and concentration. Multiple morphologies such as ellipsoid, tube, disc, stomatocytes, and large compound vesicles are found. These results give evidence of demonstrating that the shape changes are not only induced by osmotic pressure, but also by the interaction with the polymersome membranes. Additionally, this methodology provides a general tool to tailor the shape of polymersome into various morphologies.
Cell organelles have
a variety of morphologies that estimate the
form in a complex environment that contains water, salts, and others.
Several artificial systems are employed to mimic the morphologies
of cell organelles for applications ranging from nanomedical systems
to nanoreactors, such as liposomes and polymersomes.[1−7] When comparing with liposomes, polymersomes, polymeric vesicles
self-assembled from synthetic amphiphilic block copolymers, have thicker
membranes that display enhanced stability and membrane integrity under
a wide range of conditions.[8−13] Additionally, the thicker membranes allow, from an energy point
of view, the storage of more energy in the membranes transitory via
chain enwind, and then the energy is slowly released by polymer rearrangement
of the resulting shape changes at a time scale from minutes to days.[14] This unique property allows the various intermediate
shapes at the nanoscale to be captured and visualized with the assistance
of (cryogenic-)TEM.Several pioneering studies have demonstrated
that unusual shapes
could be controlled uniformly by shape transformation from spherical
polymersomes via osmotic pressure, magnetic field, and chemical structure
changes.[15−19] For example, poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(styrene)
(PEG-b-PS) spherical polymersomes transferred to
stomatocytes, bowl-shaped polymersomes, via dialysis of their organic
solvent solution against pure water, which created the osmotic pressure
differences over the PS membrane that induced the shape changes.[14] The compelling dual-compartmentalized stomatocyte-structures
are capable of encapsulating catalytic nanoparticles or enzymatic
networks toward the formation of complex nanoreactors and nanomotors.[20,21] Further studies demonstrated that the pathway of the shape change
is strongly influenced by the bending energy (Eb), which can be functionalized by three parameters: the bending
rigidity (k), the mean surface curvature (C), and the spontaneous curvature (C0), as shown in eq :The bending rigidity (k) is dictated by the chemical
properties of the membrane; the mean surface curvature (C) is dictated by the degree of curvature at different positions on
the membrane and is contingent upon the shape. Contrary to C, the spontaneous curvature (C0) is not a consequence of the shape, but arises from asymmetry in
copolymer conformation between the inner and outer surfaces and is
therefore sensitive to the membrane microenvironment. A positive C0 would promote the shape change to prolates
and tubes; rather, a negative C0 contributes
to the pathway to oblates, disks, and stomatocytes.[22,23] Very recently, our research revealed that other chemical additives
such as PEG can not only drive the shape change via increasing osmotic
pressure, but also change the pathway to form oblates, disks, and
stomatocytes and even to fuse the polymersome membrane to generate
intriguing shapes such as nest and stomatocyte-in-stomatocyte in a
short period of time (<1 min).[24] This
result indicates that the added PEG and the PEG part of the polymersome
interaction exists, which changed the values of C0 at various conditions, leading to different shape change
pathways.In this context, we could propose that salts should
also have the
capability to induce the shape changes of polymersomes via an increase
of osmotic pressure and to influence the pathway via affecting the C0 values though polymer–ion or ion–hydrated
polymer interaction, and this interaction should be dependent on the
specific ion types. To demonstrate this hypothesis, herein, we employed
eight types of common salts to test their capabilities of inducing
shape change of polymersome (PEG-b-PS). The morphologies
were followed by TEM after quenching samples into a large amount of
water. Cation and anion variations were studied separately at different
concentrations. Interestingly, we found that, at the same concentration,
different salts can induce polymersomes to transform to different
shapes, while the same salt at different concentrations can lead to
multiple shape changes.
Experimental Section
Materials
All reagents and chemicals were purchased
from commercial sources and used as received. Milli-Q-water (18.1
MΩ) was used throughout the experiments. Molecular weights of
the block copolymers were measured on a Shimadzu Prominence GPC system
equipped with a PL gel 5 μm mixed D column (Polymer Laboratories)
and differential refractive index and UV (254 nm) detectors. THF was
used as an eluent with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. NMR spectra were performed
on a Varian Inova 400 spectrometer with CDCl3 as a solvent.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) samples were prepared in the
following way: a solution of sample (6 μL) was air-dried on
a carbon-coated Cu TEM grid (200 mesh). A TEM JEOL 1010 microscope
at an acceleration voltage of 60 kV was used to perform the measurements.
Sonicator VWR USC300TH was used for the sonication experiments at
room temperature. A JEOL 2100 cryo-Transmission Electron Microscope
was used for characterization of polymersome structures. Poly(ethylene
glycol) macroinitiators and block copolymers, poly(ethylene glycol)-b-polystyrene (PEG-b-PS) were used the
one reported previously.[12]
Preparation
of Polymersomes
Modified from the former
literature report,[14] a typical procedure
is described: PEG45-b-PS230 (20 mg) was dissolved in a solvent mixture of tetrahydrofuran (THF)
and 1,4-dioxane (dioxane) (2 mL, 4:1 by volume) in a 15 mL capped
vial with a magnetic stirrer. After dissolving the solution for 1
h at room temperature, a syringe pump equipped with a syringe with
a needle was calibrated to deliver water with a speed of 1 mL/h. The
needle from the syringe was inserted into the vial of which the cap
was replaced by a rubber septum. A total of 1 mL of water was pumped
into the organic solution with vigorous stirring (900 rpm). When finishing
the water addition, 50 μL of the suspension was dropped at once
into 1 mL of pure water with stirring, which ensured a rapid quenching
of the PS domain within the bilayer of the polymersomes.
Salt-Induced
Reshaping Polymersome
Polymersome suspension
(200 μL) in organic/water solution was loaded in a 1.5 mL Eppendorf
centrifugation tube. A total of 10 μL of salt aqueous solution
(0.2–2.0 × 10–5 M) was added into the
suspension under a shaking speed of 1200 rmp. After 1 min, 1 mL of
ultrapure water was added one time in the solution to freeze the structure.
Results and Discussion
Polymersome Preparation
The experimental
procedure
is described in Figure . Spherical polymersomes were assembled from 20 mg of PEG45-b-PS230 (Đ = 1.09, the number-average
molecular weight of PS was calculated via 1H NMR spectroscopy)
in 2 mL of THF/1,4-dioxane = 4:1 (v/v) via slow addition of water
at a rate of 1 mL/h.[12] The suspension became
turbid when 0.44 mL of water was added. When the volume of water reached
1 mL, 200 μL of the polymersome suspension was transferred to
a centrifuge tube. Due to the relatively high organic solvent content
(67 vol %), the polymersome membrane is flexible and permeable to
the solvent, allowing the shape transition to occur. Then 10 μL
of salts aqueous solutions was added into the suspension at once,
followed by 1 min shaking for shape transition. A fraction of this
solution (50 μL) was taken from this suspension and added at
once to 1 mL of pure water to rapidly freeze the shape. The suspension
was purified 3× by ultracentrifugation to remove the added salt,
leaving for TEM sample preparation.
Figure 1
(a) Legend, showing the structure of the
PEG-b-PS block copolymer building block in organic
solvents. (b) Scheme
of the self-assembly process. Water is slowly (1 mL·h–1) added to a solution of PEG-b-PS in THF/dioxane
until it reaches 33 vol %. Polymersomes with spherical vesicle (SV)
shape was assembled after the critical aggregation point, about 20
vol % of water. (c) After addition of salts containing various cations
(NH4+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+) and anions (SCN–, NO3–, Cl–, HPO42–, SO42–) into the polymersome solution, the SV shape
changed to ellipsoid (ELL), tube, disc, stomatocytes (STO), and large
compound vesicles (LCV). The capacity of ions to induce these shape
change follows the order of the Hofmeister series, as the arrow pointed.
(a) Legend, showing the structure of the
PEG-b-PS block copolymer building block in organic
solvents. (b) Scheme
of the self-assembly process. Water is slowly (1 mL·h–1) added to a solution of PEG-b-PS in THF/dioxane
until it reaches 33 vol %. Polymersomes with spherical vesicle (SV)
shape was assembled after the critical aggregation point, about 20
vol % of water. (c) After addition of salts containing various cations
(NH4+, Na+, Mg2+, Ca2+) and anions (SCN–, NO3–, Cl–, HPO42–, SO42–) into the polymersome solution, the SV shape
changed to ellipsoid (ELL), tube, disc, stomatocytes (STO), and large
compound vesicles (LCV). The capacity of ions to induce these shape
change follows the order of the Hofmeister series, as the arrow pointed.
Shape Transformation
The results
observed from TEM
images demonstrated that all eight types of salts can induce the shape
change of the polymersomes at certain concentrations above 1 ×
10–5 M, following a route of ellipse, tube, disc,
stomatocyte, and LCV, as shown in Figures d and 3c. Without
considering the salt and polymer interaction, the driving force of
these shape changes would be osmotic pressure. In our experiment,
the salts were shortly added into the polymersome suspension that
immediately caused large osmotic pressure differences over the polymersome
membrane, especially at a high salt concentration, leading to the
organic solvent/water squeezed out from the cavity to release the
osmotic energy via deflation. The more salt was added, the bigger
osmotic pressure was induced, causing the larger reduced volume (deflation)
of the polymersome. This volume reduced sequence is corresponding
to a shape-change sequence of SV, ELL, DISC, and STO (Figure d). During the deflation, the
osmotic energy decreases, but the bending energy increases until it
becomes a domain parameter for the shape. To minimize the bending
energy polymers in the polymersome need to adjust the number proportion
between the inner and the outer layers, so-called surface area difference,
to form the final kinetic shapes. But only osmotic pressure cannot
explain the shape change at a very low salt concentration and the
shape variations at the same salt concentration, but different salt
types. For example, at 0.001 M NaSCN cannot change the shape while
NaCl can elongate the polymersome to ELL. We suppose that the difference
is mainly caused by the interaction of ions and polymer (PEG).[25] Thus, the interaction of the ions and PEG should
be a coexisting effecter of the shape change. Interestingly, we found
the shape change triggered by salt follows a sequence exactly the
same as Hofmeister series.
Figure 2
(a–c) Interactions among anions, PEG,
and hydration waters.
(a) Hydrogen bonds between water molecules and the ethylene glycol
side chains are destabilized through polarization by the anion X–; (b) direct binding of the anion to the polymer, leading
to ion accumulation at the polymer/water interface; (c) the anions
can interfere with the hydrophobic hydration of the polymer backbone
by increasing or decreasing the surface tension at the polymer/water
interface. (d) Shapes obtained from various sodium salts at different
concentrations (10–2–10–5 M). The TEM images of SV, ELL, STO, DISC, and LCV (cryo-TEM image
inserted); scale bar (red): 500 nm. The whole shape images are presented
in Figure S1. The cyro-TEM images of SV
and ELL were shown in Figure S3.
Figure 3
(a, b) Interactions among cations, PEG corona, and water.
(a) Monocations
interact directly with the PEG oxygen atom; (b) dications interact
with PEG oxygen atom from nearby two chains or from nearby ethylene
glycol units of a signal chain like crown ethers, as well the highly
hydrated divalent cations indirectly interact with PEG. (c) Shapes
obtained from variation of the cations at different the concentration
ranging from 10–2 M to 10–5 M.
The whole shape images are presented in Figure S2.
(a–c) Interactions among anions, PEG,
and hydration waters.
(a) Hydrogen bonds between water molecules and the ethylene glycol
side chains are destabilized through polarization by the anion X–; (b) direct binding of the anion to the polymer, leading
to ion accumulation at the polymer/water interface; (c) the anions
can interfere with the hydrophobic hydration of the polymer backbone
by increasing or decreasing the surface tension at the polymer/water
interface. (d) Shapes obtained from various sodium salts at different
concentrations (10–2–10–5 M). The TEM images of SV, ELL, STO, DISC, and LCV (cryo-TEM image
inserted); scale bar (red): 500 nm. The whole shape images are presented
in Figure S1. The cyro-TEM images of SV
and ELL were shown in Figure S3.(a, b) Interactions among cations, PEG corona, and water.
(a) Monocations
interact directly with the PEGoxygen atom; (b) dications interact
with PEGoxygen atom from nearby two chains or from nearby ethylene
glycol units of a signal chain like crown ethers, as well the highly
hydrated divalent cations indirectly interact with PEG. (c) Shapes
obtained from variation of the cations at different the concentration
ranging from 10–2 M to 10–5 M.
The whole shape images are presented in Figure S2.Hofmeister series is a classification
of ions in order of their
ability to salt out or salt in proteins, which is generally more pronounced
for anions than for cations.[26] SCN–, NO3–, and Cl– are referred to as chaotropes, which are known to destabilize folded
proteins and give rise to the salting-in behavior, while HPO42– and SO42– are called
kosmotropes, which are strongly hydrated and have stabilizing and
salting-out effects on proteins and macromolecules.[27−32] Three types of interactions exist between the anions and the PEG
polymer in water media. First, the anions can polarize an adjacent
water molecule that is in turn involved in hydrogen bonding with the
oxygen atom (Figure a). Second, the anions may bind directly to the PEG, leading to ion
accumulation at the polymer/water interface (Figure b). Third, these species can interfere with
the hydrophobic hydration of the polymer by increasing the surface
tension of the cavity from the hydrophobic segment (Figure c). All of these three interactions
have influence on the spontaneous curvature C0, resulting in a change of Eb and
shape variation.
Effects of Anions
Here we choose
NaSCN, NaNO3, NaCl, Na2HPO4, and
Na2SO4 to test their differences of reshaping
polymersome. As shown in Figure d, NaSCN could only
elongate the spherical polymersome to ellipsoid even at a concentration
of 1 × 10–2 M, similar to NaNO3,
both of which are chaotropic ions. But NaNO3 performs slightly
more efficient to induce the shape change at an order of magnetite
lower concentration (1 × 10–3 M). NaCl is the
only monovalence salt in this context that can reshape polymersome
to stomatocyte at 1 × 10–2 M, demonstrating
the order of anion for reshaping polymersome followed the Hofmeister
series as Cl– > NO3– ≈ SCN–. Divalent anions, comparing with
monovalent anions, carry the higher capability to push the shape change
further. Na2HPO4 and Na2SO4 as the kosmotropic ion can reshape polymersome to ellipsoid and
tube at 1 × 10–4 M, stomatocytes at 1 ×
10–3 M, and LCV at 1 × 10–2 M.Ellipsoid, tube, disc, and stomatocytes shapes can be explained
by the collective effect of osmotic pressure and bending energy. But
the formation of LCV goes though membrane fusion process, which is
more complex. We supposed an explanation based on the molar surface
tension increment, kE = (∂Δγ/∂m)T, of the anions. Previous research gave
the averages kE of different salt aqueous
solutions, as Na2SO4 ≈ 2.77 mN L m–1 mol–1, NaCl ≈ 1.73 mN L
m–1 mol–1, NaNO3 ≈
1.21 mN L m–1 mol–1, and NaSCN
≈ 0.5 mN L m–1 mol–1.[33] The shape change correlates very well to the
anions’ surface tension increment, which suggests that the
removal of hydration waters from the hydrophobic polymer backbone
(the mechanism of Figure c) plays an important role in the shape change process. This
removal might generate bundling force to the individual polymer chains,
which induces the membrane fusion to form LCV, as the cryo-TEM image
shown as the inset photo in Figure d when Na2SO4 and Na2HPO4 are at 0.01 M.
Effects of Cations
Besides anions, a Hofmeister series
has also been established for cations, with an order of NH4+ > Na+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+. NH4+ and Na+ decrease
the solubility
of proteins, while Mg2+ and Ca2+ increase their
solubility.[27,28] The effects of cations, however,
tend to be much less pronounced than those of anions, because the
cations are generally excluded from the polymer/water interface. Since
the PEG corona of the polymersome is negatively charged in the aqueous
solution, and the free electrons doublets on PEOoxygen atoms display
an attractive force with respect to cationic species,[34] or interact with cations in a similar way as crown ethers,
such direct cation binding would lead to additional charge and increased
solubility of the polymer and thus to shape changes.We tested
the influence of cations on the shape change of polymersome by adding
different salts (cations including NH4+, Na+, Mg2+, and Ca2+) with chloride counterions
in a concentration of 1 × 10–2 to 1 ×
10–5 M. For a monovalent cation, the result is presented
in Figure c, at 1
× 10–3 M, NH4Cl has barely any effect
on the shape change, while NaCl changes a big portion to ellipsoid,
which indicates that the existence of the interaction between PEG
corona and ions (Figure a), as well Na+ has stronger effect than NH4+. Comparing with monovalent ions, divalent ions exhibit
higher charge-ionic radius ratio that should bind PEG stronger and
more efficiency (Figure b), resulting in shape change at lower concentrations. The results
in Figure c demonstrate
this hypothesis. Divalent MgCl2 and CaCl2 initiate
shape change at concentrations approximately 1 order of magnitude
lower than monovalent salts. As we hypothesize above, Ca2+ or Mg2+ are able to specifically binds with the oxygen
of the ethylene oxide unite, either by an increase in the out-surface
area of the corona to induce shape change to stomatocytes or by facilitating
fusion by associating polymer chains inner-molecularly to form membrane-fused
vesicles (LCV) by intermolecular bridges in semidilute solution, resulting
in the fusion of different vesicle corona.[35,36] When the concentration of MgCl2 and CaCl2 reached
0.01 M, the shapes changed to LCV. Thus, the ranking order of the
cation ability to initiate shape changes is opposite to the Hofmeister
series as Ca2+ > Mg2+ ≫ Na+ > NH4+.
Conclusions
In
conclusion, we showed that we can use the Hofmeister series
to precisely reshape polymersomes from spherical vesicles to ellipsoid,
tube, disc, stomatocytes and large compound vesicles. These shape
changes are driven by both osmotic pressure and the interactions between
salt ions and PEG corona. The salt variation strongly influences the
shape change. For example, at the same concentration (1 × 10–3 M), NH4Cl presented no influence on shape,
but MgCl2 changed the shape to stomatocytes. Kosmotropic
ions can reshape polymersome much more efficiently than chaotropic
ions, since they are more polarizable, hydrate more strongly, and
interact with the PEG corona more sufficiently, as well as cross-linking
the nearby PEG segments inner/intermolecularly.The addition
of common additives such as salts to tune the shape
of polymersome can be exploited in protein encapsulation applications,
where salts present synergistic effect. To control the shape change
of polymersomes, the usually used dialysis method is time costly and
results in a limited number of controlled shapes. The addition of
salt to polymersome can not only change the shape in a much faster
manner, but also enlarge the shape portfolio of polymersomes. In this
way, chaotropic ions can be used to create osmotic pressure without
inducing shape changes at a relatively high concentration, which is
suitable for the application of crystallization, whereas the kosmotropic
ions can efficiently change the shape at a very low concentration,
suitable for encapsulation of ion-sensitive particles.
Authors: Yingfeng Tu; Fei Peng; Xiaofeng Sui; Yongjun Men; Paul B White; Jan C M van Hest; Daniela A Wilson Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2016-12-12 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Loai K E A Abdelmohsen; David S Williams; Jan Pille; Sema G Ozel; Roger S M Rikken; Daniela A Wilson; Jan C M van Hest Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Sjoerd J Rijpkema; Sabine G H A Langens; Marnix R van der Kolk; Katerina Gavriel; B Jelle Toebes; Daniela A Wilson Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 6.988