Literature DB >> 31525737

Preoperative Prediction of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Grading Based on Enhanced Computed Tomography Imaging: Validation of Deep Learning with a Convolutional Neural Network.

Yanji Luo1, Xin Chen2, Jie Chen3, Chenyu Song1, Jingxian Shen4, Huanhui Xiao2, Minhu Chen3, Zi-Ping Li1, Bingsheng Huang5, Shi-Ting Feng1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The pathological grading of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) is an independent predictor of survival and indicator for treatment. Deep learning (DL) with a convolutional neural network (CNN) may improve the preoperative prediction of pNEN grading.
METHODS: Ninety-three pNEN patients with preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) from Hospital I were retrospectively enrolled. A CNN-based DL algorithm was applied to the CECT images to obtain 3 models (arterial, venous, and arterial/venous models), the performances of which were evaluated via an eightfold cross-validation technique. The CECT images of the optimal phase were used for comparing the DL and traditional machine learning (TML) models in predicting the pathological grading of pNENs. The performance of radiologists by using qualitative and quantitative computed tomography findings was also evaluated. The best DL model from the eightfold cross-validation was evaluated on an independent testing set of 19 patients from Hospital II who were scanned on a different scanner. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was employed for survival analysis.
RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC; 0.81) of arterial phase in validation set was significantly higher than those of venous (AUC 0.57, p = 0.03) and arterial/venous phase (AUC 0.70, p = 0.03) in predicting the pathological grading of pNENs. Compared with the TML models, the DL model gave a higher (although insignificantly) AUC. The highest OR was achieved for the p ratio <0.9, the AUC and accuracy for diagnosing G3 pNENs were 0.80 and 79.1% respectively. The DL algorithm achieved an AUC of 0.82 and an accuracy of 88.1% for the independent testing set. The KM analysis showed a statistical significant difference between the predicted G1/2 and G3 groups in the progression-free survival (p = 0.001) and overall survival (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The CNN-based DL method showed a relatively robust performance in predicting pathological grading of pNENs from CECT images.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep learning; Neoplasm grading; Neuroendocrine tumors; Pancreatic neoplasms; Tomography, spiral computed

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31525737     DOI: 10.1159/000503291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0028-3835            Impact factor:   4.914


  11 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Sakamoto; Tadahiro Goto; Michimasa Fujiogi; Alan Kawarai Lefor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  GEP-NET radiomics: a systematic review and radiomics quality score assessment.

Authors:  Femke C R Staal; Else A Aalbersberg; Daphne van der Velden; Erica A Wilthagen; Margot E T Tesselaar; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Monique Maas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence for the management of pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Myrte Gorris; Sanne A Hoogenboom; Michael B Wallace; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 7.559

4.  Predicting the recurrence risk of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms after radical resection using deep learning radiomics with preoperative computed tomography images.

Authors:  Chenyu Song; Mingyu Wang; Yanji Luo; Jie Chen; Zhenpeng Peng; Yangdi Wang; Hongyuan Zhang; Zi-Ping Li; Jingxian Shen; Bingsheng Huang; Shi-Ting Feng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05

Review 5.  Machine intelligence in non-invasive endocrine cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Nicole M Thomasian; Ihab R Kamel; Harrison X Bai
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 6.  Using Quantitative Imaging for Personalized Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Radiomics and Deep Learning Applications.

Authors:  Kiersten Preuss; Nate Thach; Xiaoying Liang; Michael Baine; Justin Chen; Chi Zhang; Huijing Du; Hongfeng Yu; Chi Lin; Michael A Hollingsworth; Dandan Zheng
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Design of Optimal Deep Learning-Based Pancreatic Tumor and Nontumor Classification Model Using Computed Tomography Scans.

Authors:  Maha M Althobaiti; Ahmed Almulihi; Amal Adnan Ashour; Romany F Mansour; Deepak Gupta
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms-A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Athanasios G Pantelis; Panagiota A Panagopoulou; Dimitris P Lapatsanis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-31

Review 9.  Hyperpolarized Magnetic Resonance and Artificial Intelligence: Frontiers of Imaging in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  José S Enriquez; Yan Chu; Shivanand Pudakalakatti; Kang Lin Hsieh; Duncan Salmon; Prasanta Dutta; Niki Zacharias Millward; Eugene Lurie; Steven Millward; Florencia McAllister; Anirban Maitra; Subrata Sen; Ann Killary; Jian Zhang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Pratip K Bhattacharya; Shayan Shams
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2021-06-17

10.  Application of CT-Based Radiomics in Discriminating Pancreatic Cystadenomas From Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Using Machine Learning Methods.

Authors:  Xuejiao Han; Jing Yang; Jingwen Luo; Pengan Chen; Zilong Zhang; Aqu Alu; Yinan Xiao; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.