| Literature DB >> 31523523 |
Fábia Albernaz Massarani1, Marta Citelli1, Daniela Silva Canella1, Josely Correa Koury1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Adolescents, particularly athletes, have high exposure to ultra-processed foods, which could be harmful to their health and physical performance. School environments are capable of improving eating patterns. Our study is aimed at capturing changes in students' food consumption three years after they enrolled at an experimental school, considered a model of health promotion in Rio de Janeiro city. We also aimed to depict the promising nature of the healthy eating promotion program implemented in the school and share the learnings from its implementation.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Athletes; Experimental kitchen; School garden
Year: 2019 PMID: 31523523 PMCID: PMC6717494 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PeerJ ISSN: 2167-8359 Impact factor: 2.984
Integrated school program’s actions, description and categorization.
| Planning and construction of the school garden and the experimental kitchen | • Garden logistics | • Planning and stablishing the physical space | The construction of the physical space of the school garden and the experimental kitchen was done with the direct involvement of teachers and parents through their participation in the planning, conception of ideas, choice and acquisition of materials. A group of parents, who were beneficiaries of a municipal fellowship program, helped to carry out the maintenance of the garden. Each semester, this group was partially renewed. |
| • School culture | • Characteristics of the physical space | ||
| • Garden care and upkeep | |||
| • Crop diversity | |||
| • Budget and funding | |||
| • Network and outside organization | |||
| • Administrative support | |||
| • Organization staff structure | |||
| • Volunteer and parent involvement | |||
| • Social events and activities | |||
| • Food environment and policies | |||
| Development of materials for nutritional education | • Student experience | • Connection with curriculum | Three new disciplines were added to the school curriculum: “Health Promotion” (mandatory); “Gardening” (elective); “Flavor and Art” (elective). “Health Promotion” was taught once a week, for 50 min, during the school year. Elective disciplines were taught once a week, for 50 min. All students participated in the elective disciplines for one semester, at least. |
| • School culture | • Time spent in the garden | ||
| • Additional learning opportunities | |||
| • Administrative support | |||
| • Organizational staff structure | |||
| • Food environment and policies | |||
| Seeding, planting, maintenance, harvesting, food preparation and tasting by the students | • Garden logistics | • Connection with curriculum | Each week, students participated in activities that were proposed by the “Gardening” discipline, which involved sowing, planting, maintaining or harvesting the vegetables. The “Flavor and Art” discipline was held on a weekly basis and aimed to promote students getting in touch with healthy foods and learning new ways to create tasty culinary preparations. Harvests of the school garden were used by the “Flavor and Art” discipline. “Flavor and Art” was coordinated by the art professor. |
| • Student experience | • Activities | ||
| • Engagement | |||
| • Tasting opportunities | |||
| • Additional learning opportunities | |||
| Interdisciplinary classes | • Student experience | • Additional learning opportunities | Use of the school garden and experimental kitchen to teach other subjects. |
Food consumption based on markers of unprocessed and processed foods.
| Beans | 0.0 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 9.6 | 18.9 | 13.8 | 76.7 | 78.0 | 6.5 (6.3; 6.7) | 6.5 (6.2; 6.7) |
| Raw salad | 44.4 | 32.4 | 33.3 | 39.6 | 14.4 | 7.2 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 5.6 | 15.6 | 1.4 (1.0; 1.9) | 2.2 (1.6; 2.7) |
| Cooked vegetables | 18.9 | 20.4 | 34.4 | 32.4 | 17.8 | 10.6 | 12.2 | 20.4 | 16.7 | 15.6 | 2.9 (2.4; 3.4) | 2.9 (2.4; 3.5) |
| Fruits | 8.9 | 3.6 | 21.1 | 19.2 | 17.8 | 6.0 | 14.4 | 26.4 | 37.8 | 44.4 | 4.3 (3.8; 4.9) | 5.0 (4.5; 5.5) |
| Milk | 26.7 | 19.2 | 7.9 | 10.8 | 14.4 | 9.6 | 5.5 | 13.2 | 44.4 | 46.8 | 4.0 (3.4; 4.7) | 4.4 (3.8; 5.1) |
| French fries | 66.7 | 69.6 | 30.0 | 22.8 | 2.2 | 4.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.5 (0.3; 0.7) | 0.6 (0.3; 0.8) |
| Fried snack | 46.0 | 46.8 | 51.1 | 46.8 | 0.0 | 4.8 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.0 | 0.8 (0.6; 1.0) | 0.8 (0.6; 1.0) |
| Processed meat | 21.1 | 21.6 | 43.3 | 49.2 | 25.6 | 14.4 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 6.7 | 12 | 2.0 (1.6; 2.4) | 2.1 (1.6; 2.6) |
| Crackers | 33.3 | 34.8 | 46.7 | 38.4 | 12.2 | 11.8 | 1.1 | 7.2 | 6.7 | 8.4 | 1.6 (1.2; 2.0) | 1.9 (1.4; 2.4) |
| Cookies | 33.3 | 26.4 | 43.3 | 37.4 | 10.0 | 15.6 | 4.4 | 8.4 | 8.9 | 12.0 | 1.8 (1.4; 2.3) | 2.3 (1.8; 2.8) |
| Candies | 15.6 | 16.8 | 32.2 | 31.2 | 21.1 | 25.2 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 25.6 | 21.6 | 3.2 (2.7; 3.8) | 3.1 (2.6; 3.7) |
| Soft drinks | 24.4 | 18.0 | 45.6 | 48.4 | 22.2 | 15.6 | 1.1 | 8.4 | 6.7 | 4.8 | 2.0 (1.6; 2.4) | 2.0 (1.6; 2.4) |
Notes.
Food frequency questionnaire (FFQ)—inquired about the frequency of the past week’s food consumption (from “never” to “everyday” in the previous seven days).
confidence interval