Jiqiang Wu1, Brett Einerson2, Janet M Shaw3, Ingrid E Nygaard4, Xiaoming Sheng5, Ali Wolpern3, Marlene J Egger6. 1. Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 3. Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah College of Health, Salt Lake City, UT. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. Electronic address: Ingrid.nygaard@hsc.utah.edu. 5. College of Nursing. 6. Division of Public Health, Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe sleep quality and sleep duration in primiparous women 6 months postpartum and to determine whether sleep quality is associated with 24-hour physical activity assessed using triaxial wrist accelerometry and a novel analytic technique, functional data analysis (FDA). METHODS: Six months postpartum, participants wore a triaxial wrist accelerometer for 7 days and completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We categorized sleep quality as good (score ≤5) or poor (>5). Data were summarized as vector magnitude of accelerations net of local gravity, or "Euclidean Norm Minus One" (ENMO, mg), in 5-second epochs. Using FDA, we modeled ENMO as a continuously changing, functional outcome predicted by sleep quality. We also compared mean total ENMO per 24-hour day, mean minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and of light activity/day, and mean minutes of MVPA in 10-minute bouts/day by sleep quality. RESULTS: Of 365 women that completed the PSQI, 215 (59%) reported poor sleep quality. Two hundred ninety-six women completed both the PSQI and valid accelerometry. With the exception of one brief period around noon, sleep quality was not significantly associated with 24-hour physical activity according to FDA. Women with poor sleep quality had slightly greater total mean activity, minutes of light activity, and minutes of MVPA per day, but no difference in minutes of MVPA in at least 10-minute bouts. CONCLUSION: Poor sleep quality is common 6 months postpartum. We identified no clinically significant differences in physical activity metrics between women with good and poor quality sleep.
OBJECTIVE: To describe sleep quality and sleep duration in primiparous women 6 months postpartum and to determine whether sleep quality is associated with 24-hour physical activity assessed using triaxial wrist accelerometry and a novel analytic technique, functional data analysis (FDA). METHODS: Six months postpartum, participants wore a triaxial wrist accelerometer for 7 days and completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). We categorized sleep quality as good (score ≤5) or poor (>5). Data were summarized as vector magnitude of accelerations net of local gravity, or "Euclidean Norm Minus One" (ENMO, mg), in 5-second epochs. Using FDA, we modeled ENMO as a continuously changing, functional outcome predicted by sleep quality. We also compared mean total ENMO per 24-hour day, mean minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and of light activity/day, and mean minutes of MVPA in 10-minute bouts/day by sleep quality. RESULTS: Of 365 women that completed the PSQI, 215 (59%) reported poor sleep quality. Two hundred ninety-six women completed both the PSQI and valid accelerometry. With the exception of one brief period around noon, sleep quality was not significantly associated with 24-hour physical activity according to FDA. Women with poor sleep quality had slightly greater total mean activity, minutes of light activity, and minutes of MVPA per day, but no difference in minutes of MVPA in at least 10-minute bouts. CONCLUSION: Poor sleep quality is common 6 months postpartum. We identified no clinically significant differences in physical activity metrics between women with good and poor quality sleep.
Authors: Alex V Rowlands; Dylan P Cliff; Stuart J Fairclough; Lynne M Boddy; Tim S Olds; Gaynor Parfitt; Rob J Noonan; Samantha J Downs; Zoe R Knowles; Michael W Beets Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Francesca L Facco; William A Grobman; Kathryn J Reid; Corette B Parker; Shannon M Hunter; Robert M Silver; Robert C Basner; George R Saade; Grace W Pien; Shalini Manchanda; Judette M Louis; Chia-Ling Nhan-Chang; Judith H Chung; Deborah A Wing; Hyagriv N Simhan; David M Haas; Jay Iams; Samuel Parry; Phyllis C Zee Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-06-07 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ali E Wolpern; Kyle J Sherwin; Whitney D Moss; Ingrid E Nygaard; Marlene J Egger; Timothy A Brusseau; Janet M Shaw Journal: Heliyon Date: 2019-01-31
Authors: Vincent T van Hees; Lukas Gorzelniak; Emmanuel Carlos Dean León; Martin Eder; Marcelo Pias; Salman Taherian; Ulf Ekelund; Frida Renström; Paul W Franks; Alexander Horsch; Søren Brage Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Juan Carlos Sanchez-Garcia; María José Aguilar-Cordero; Maria Montiel-Troya; Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez; Jonathan Cortes-Martin; Raquel Rodriguez-Blanque Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 4.964