Alex V Rowlands1, Dylan P Cliff, Stuart J Fairclough, Lynne M Boddy, Tim S Olds, Gaynor Parfitt, Rob J Noonan, Samantha J Downs, Zoe R Knowles, Michael W Beets. 1. 1Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UNITED KINGDOM; 2NIHR Leicester-Loughborough Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit, UNITED KINGDOM; 3Division of Health Sciences, Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity (ARENA), Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, AUSTRALIA; 4School of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, Early Start Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, AUSTRALIA; 5Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UNITED KINGDOM; 6Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, IRELAND; 7Physical Activity Exchange, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UNITED KINGDOM; and 8Arnold School of Public Health, Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide a means for calibrating raw acceleration data from wrist-worn accelerometers in relation to past estimates of children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from a range of cut points applied to hip-worn ActiGraph data. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of three studies with concurrent 7-d accelerometer wear at the wrist (GENEActiv) and hip (ActiGraph) in 238 children age 9-12 yr. The time spent above acceleration (ENMO) thresholds of 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 mg from wrist acceleration data (≤5-s epoch) was calculated for comparison with MVPA estimated from widely used children's hip-worn ActiGraph MVPA cut points (Freedson/Trost, 1100 counts per minute; Pate, 1680 counts per minute; Evenson, 2296 counts per minute; Puyau, 3200 counts per minute) with epochs of ≤5, 15, and 60 s. RESULTS: The optimal ENMO thresholds for alignment with MVPA estimates from ActiGraph cut points determined from 70% of the sample and cross validated with the remaining 30% were as follows: Freedson/Trost = ENMO 150+ mg, irrespective of ActiGraph epoch (intraclass correlation [ICC] ≥ 0.65); Pate = ENMO 200+ mg, irrespective of ActiGraph epoch (ICC ≥ 0.67); Evenson = ENMO 250+ mg for ≤5- and 15-s epochs (ICC ≥ 0.69) and ENMO 300+ mg for 60-s epochs (ICC = 0.73); Puyau = ENMO 300+ mg for ≤5-s epochs (ICC = 0.73), ENMO 350+ mg for 15-s epochs (ICC = 0.73), and ENMO 400+ mg for 60-s epochs (ICC = 0.65). Agreement was robust with cross-validation ICC = 0.62-0.71 and means within ∣7.8∣% ± 4.9% of MVPA estimates from ActiGraph cut points, except Puyau 60-s epochs (ICC = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Incremental ENMO thresholds enable children's acceleration data measured at the wrist to be simply and directly compared, at a group level, with past estimates of MVPA from hip-worn ActiGraphs across a range of cut points.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to provide a means for calibrating raw acceleration data from wrist-worn accelerometers in relation to past estimates of children's moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) from a range of cut points applied to hip-worn ActiGraph data. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of three studies with concurrent 7-d accelerometer wear at the wrist (GENEActiv) and hip (ActiGraph) in 238 children age 9-12 yr. The time spent above acceleration (ENMO) thresholds of 100, 150, 200, 250, 300, 350, and 400 mg from wrist acceleration data (≤5-s epoch) was calculated for comparison with MVPA estimated from widely used children's hip-worn ActiGraph MVPA cut points (Freedson/Trost, 1100 counts per minute; Pate, 1680 counts per minute; Evenson, 2296 counts per minute; Puyau, 3200 counts per minute) with epochs of ≤5, 15, and 60 s. RESULTS: The optimal ENMO thresholds for alignment with MVPA estimates from ActiGraph cut points determined from 70% of the sample and cross validated with the remaining 30% were as follows: Freedson/Trost = ENMO 150+ mg, irrespective of ActiGraph epoch (intraclass correlation [ICC] ≥ 0.65); Pate = ENMO 200+ mg, irrespective of ActiGraph epoch (ICC ≥ 0.67); Evenson = ENMO 250+ mg for ≤5- and 15-s epochs (ICC ≥ 0.69) and ENMO 300+ mg for 60-s epochs (ICC = 0.73); Puyau = ENMO 300+ mg for ≤5-s epochs (ICC = 0.73), ENMO 350+ mg for 15-s epochs (ICC = 0.73), and ENMO 400+ mg for 60-s epochs (ICC = 0.65). Agreement was robust with cross-validation ICC = 0.62-0.71 and means within ∣7.8∣% ± 4.9% of MVPA estimates from ActiGraph cut points, except Puyau 60-s epochs (ICC = 0.42). CONCLUSION: Incremental ENMO thresholds enable children's acceleration data measured at the wrist to be simply and directly compared, at a group level, with past estimates of MVPA from hip-worn ActiGraphs across a range of cut points.
Authors: Sarah G Sanders; Elizabeth Yakes Jimenez; Natalie H Cole; Alena Kuhlemeier; Grace L McCauley; M Lee Van Horn; Alberta S Kong Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2019-07-17
Authors: Jiqiang Wu; Brett Einerson; Janet M Shaw; Ingrid E Nygaard; Xiaoming Sheng; Ali Wolpern; Marlene J Egger Journal: Sleep Health Date: 2019-09-12
Authors: Sunku Kwon; Neng Wan; Ryan D Burns; Timothy A Brusseau; Youngwon Kim; Santosh Kumar; Emre Ertin; David W Wetter; Cho Y Lam; Ming Wen; Wonwoo Byun Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Sarah L Taylor; Whitney B Curry; Zoe R Knowles; Robert J Noonan; Bronagh McGrane; Stuart J Fairclough Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2017-05-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Michael B Owen; Charlotte Kerner; Sarah L Taylor; Robert J Noonan; Lisa Newson; Maria-Christina Kosteli; Whitney B Curry; Stuart J Fairclough Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2018-05-31
Authors: Renato T Souza; Jose Guilherme Cecatti; Jussara Mayrink; Rafael Bessa Galvão; Maria Laura Costa; Francisco Feitosa; Edilberto Rocha Filho; Debora F Leite; Janete Vettorazzi; Ricardo P Tedesco; Danielly S Santana; Joao Paulo Souza Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-04-20 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Sarah L Taylor; Robert J Noonan; Zoe R Knowles; Michael B Owen; Bronagh McGrane; Whitney B Curry; Stuart J Fairclough Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jairo H Migueles; Cristina Cadenas-Sanchez; Alex V Rowlands; Pontus Henriksson; Eric J Shiroma; Francisco M Acosta; Maria Rodriguez-Ayllon; Irene Esteban-Cornejo; Abel Plaza-Florido; Jose J Gil-Cosano; Ulf Ekelund; Vincent T van Hees; Francisco B Ortega Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Ingrid E Nygaard; Ali Wolpern; Tyler Bardsley; Marlene J Egger; Janet M Shaw Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 8.661