Stephen J Carter1,2, Laura Q Rogers3, Heather R Bowles4, Lyse A Norian3, Gary R Hunter3. 1. Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health - Bloomington, Indiana University, 1025 East 7th Street SPH 046A, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. stjcarte@iu.edu. 2. Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. stjcarte@iu.edu. 3. Department of Nutrition Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. 4. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Maryland, 20892, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: With accelerometry, the utility to detect changes in physical activity are predicated on the assumption that walking energetics and gait mechanics do not change. The present work examined associations between changes (∆) in walking energetics, exercise self-efficacy, and several accelerometer-derived metrics. METHODS: Secondary analyses were performed among a sub-sample (n = 29) of breast cancer survivors participating in a larger randomized trial. During 4 min of treadmill walking (0.89 m s-1, 0% grade), indirect calorimetry quantified steady-state energy expenditure (EE), wherein, participants were fitted with a heart rate monitor and hip-worn triaxial accelerometer. Exercise self-efficacy was measured using a 9-item questionnaire, while vector magnitude (VM) and individual planes (e.g., mediolateral, vertical, and anteroposterior) of the movement were extracted for data analyses. Evaluations were made at baseline and after 3 months. RESULTS: From baseline to 3 months, the energetic cost of walking (kcals min-1) significantly decreased by an average of - 5.1% (p = 0.001; d = 0.46). Conversely, VM significantly increased (p = 0.007; d = 0.53), exclusively due to greater vertical accelerations (acc) (+ 5.7 ± 7.8 acc; p = 0.001; d = 0.69). Changes in vertical accelerations were inversely and positively associated with ∆walking EE (r = - 0.37; p = 0.047) and ∆exercise self-efficacy (r = 0.39; p = 0.034), respectively. CONCLUSION: Hip-worn accelerometers do not appear well-suited to correctly detect changes in ease of walking as evidenced by reduced energetic cost. Further research should determine if a divergence between measured EE and vertical accelerations could contribute to erroneous inferences in free-living physical activity.
PURPOSE: With accelerometry, the utility to detect changes in physical activity are predicated on the assumption that walking energetics and gait mechanics do not change. The present work examined associations between changes (∆) in walking energetics, exercise self-efficacy, and several accelerometer-derived metrics. METHODS: Secondary analyses were performed among a sub-sample (n = 29) of breast cancer survivors participating in a larger randomized trial. During 4 min of treadmill walking (0.89 m s-1, 0% grade), indirect calorimetry quantified steady-state energy expenditure (EE), wherein, participants were fitted with a heart rate monitor and hip-worn triaxial accelerometer. Exercise self-efficacy was measured using a 9-item questionnaire, while vector magnitude (VM) and individual planes (e.g., mediolateral, vertical, and anteroposterior) of the movement were extracted for data analyses. Evaluations were made at baseline and after 3 months. RESULTS: From baseline to 3 months, the energetic cost of walking (kcals min-1) significantly decreased by an average of - 5.1% (p = 0.001; d = 0.46). Conversely, VM significantly increased (p = 0.007; d = 0.53), exclusively due to greater vertical accelerations (acc) (+ 5.7 ± 7.8 acc; p = 0.001; d = 0.69). Changes in vertical accelerations were inversely and positively associated with ∆walking EE (r = - 0.37; p = 0.047) and ∆exercise self-efficacy (r = 0.39; p = 0.034), respectively. CONCLUSION: Hip-worn accelerometers do not appear well-suited to correctly detect changes in ease of walking as evidenced by reduced energetic cost. Further research should determine if a divergence between measured EE and vertical accelerations could contribute to erroneous inferences in free-living physical activity.
Entities:
Keywords:
Cardiovascular; Energy expenditure; Exercise training; Non-metastatic; Physical activity
Authors: Rebecca M Speck; Kerry S Courneya; Louise C Mâsse; Sue Duval; Kathryn H Schmitz Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2010-01-06 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Amy L Gross; Betty J May; Jennifer E Axilbund; Deborah K Armstrong; Richard B S Roden; Kala Visvanathan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Laura Q Rogers; Kerry S Courneya; Steve Verhulst; Steve Markwell; Victor Lanzotti; Prabodh Shah Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2005-07-09 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Katherine S Hall; Cheryl A Howe; Sharon R Rana; Clara L Martin; Miriam C Morey Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kimberly D Miller; Rebecca L Siegel; Chun Chieh Lin; Angela B Mariotto; Joan L Kramer; Julia H Rowland; Kevin D Stein; Rick Alteri; Ahmedin Jemal Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2016-06-02 Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Carmen D Tekwe; Mengli Zhang; Raymond J Carroll; Yuanyuan Luan; Lan Xue; Roger S Zoh; Stephen J Carter; David B Allison; Marco Geraci Journal: Biostatistics Date: 2022-10-14 Impact factor: 5.279
Authors: Catia Martins; Jessica Roekenes; Saideh Salamati; Barbara A Gower; Gary R Hunter Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2020-11-11 Impact factor: 7.045