| Literature DB >> 31519877 |
Xinda You1,2, Hong Wu3,4,5, Runnan Zhang1,2, Yanlei Su1,2, Li Cao1,2, Qianqian Yu1,2, Jinqiu Yuan1,2, Ke Xiao1,2, Mingrui He1,2, Zhongyi Jiang6,7.
Abstract
Ultrathin membranes with potentially high permeability are urgently demanded in water purification. However, their facile, controllable fabrication remains a grand challenge. Herein, we demonstrate a metal-coordinated approach towards defect-free and robust membranes with sub-10 nm thickness. Phytic acid, a natural strong electron donor, is assembled with metal ion-based electron acceptors to fabricate metal-organophosphate membranes (MOPMs) in aqueous solution. Metal ions with higher binding energy or ionization potential such as Fe3+ and Zr4+ can generate defect-free structure while MOPM-Fe3+ with superhydrophilicity is preferred. The membrane thickness is minimized to 8 nm by varying the ligand concentration and the pore structure of MOPM-Fe3+ is regulated by varying the Fe3+ content. The membrane with optimized MOPM-Fe3+ composition exhibits prominent water permeance (109.8 L m-2 h-1 bar-1) with dye rejections above 95% and superior stability. This strong-coordination assembly may enlighten the development of ultrathin high-performance membranes.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31519877 PMCID: PMC6744495 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-12100-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Metal-coordinated assembly of MOPMs. a Schematic illustration of the assembly process for MOPMs on PAN substrate with Ag+, Zn2+, Ni2+, Fe3+, and Zr4+ ions. b Transition metal ions arranged based on ionization potential (I, eV) value. The ionization potential defined as: I = E (M) − E (M), where n = 1, 2, 3, 4. c Calculated binding energy (ΔEbinding, kJ mol−1) between transition metal ions and deprotonated methyl phosphate. d FTIR curves of PAN substrate and MOPMs. e Digital photo images of water droplets on PAN substrate and MOPM-Fe3+ membrane. f SEM images of MOPMs. Scale bar: 500 nm
Fig. 2Optimizing assembly behavior for ultrathin MOPMs. a SEM images of MOPM-Fe3+ on PAN substrate. False color of yellow was utilized to singularize the MOPM-Fe3+. Scale bar: 100 nm. b TEM image of MOPM-Fe3+ on PAN substrate. Scale bar: 20 nm. c Transferred MOPM-Fe3+ on silicon wafer. Scale bar: 1 μm. Inset in c: Digital photograph of substrate-free MOPM-Fe3+ in DMF. For a–c, the PA concentration was 0.015 mg/mL. d Surface zeta potential of membranes. Inset in d: Effective pore size distribution of MOPM-Fe3+ with varied PA/Fe ratio using PEG as molecular probe. e Ultraviolet-visible spectra of aqueous solutions with different PA/Fe ratio. Inset in e: Photograph of aqueous solutions with different PA/Fe ratio under laser bean irradiation. f Size distribution of Fe3+-PA complexes in assembly solution with varied PA/Fe ratio detected by dynamic light scattering. Inset in f: Digital photo images of MOPM-Fe3+ complexes with varied PA/Fe ratio. g Schematic illustration of growth and formation for MOPM-Fe3+ with high and low PA/Fe ratio. Inset in g: SEM images of MOPM-Fe3+ with PA/Fe ratio of 1:0.5 (top) and 1:7 (bottom). Scale bar: 200 nm. Error bars represent standard deviations for 3 measurements
Fig. 3Permselectivity of MOPM/PAN membranes. a, b Filtration performance of MOPM/PAN membranes with different coordinated metal ions (a) and MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membranes with varied PA/Fe ratio (b). 100 ppm of Methyl blue (MB, 1.62 × 2.03 nm), Congo red (CR, 1.10 × 2.20 nm), Alcian blue (AB, 1.42 × 2.20 nm), Rose Bengal (RB, 1.06 × 1.08 nm) and Orange GII (OG, 0.74 × 1.07 nm) solution as feed. c Ultraviolet-visible spectra of Congo red in feed, retentate, and filtrate. PA/Fe ratio = 1:7. Inset in c: Digital photo images of feed (Fe), retentate (Re) and filtrate (Fi) (top left) and molecular structure of Congo red (bottom right). d Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectra of graphene oxide quantum dots (GQDs) in feed, retentate, and filtrate. PA/Fe ratio = 1:0.5. Inset in d: Size distribution of GQDs (top left), digital photo images of feed (Fe) and filtrate (Fi) (top right) and TEM image of GQDs (bottom). Scale bar: 10 nm. e Water permeance of MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membranes with different layer number of MOPM-Fe3+. PA/Fe ratio = 1:7. Red line was the best exponential fit. Inset in e: Mass transport resistance as a function of thickness for MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membranes with different skin layer thicknesses. Red line was the best linear fit. f Filtration performance of state-of-the-art polymeric membranes for water purification in literatures. Error bars represent standard deviations for 3 measurements
Fig. 4Stability of MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membranes. a Five-stage antifouling measurement of MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membrane with 1000 ppm of sodium alginate (SA), humid acid (HA) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) solution as feed at 1.0 bar. b Stability performance of MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membrane under varied pH conditions by immersing membrane in HCl and NaOH solution for 24 h. T = 18 °C. c Long-term water stability of MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membrane (pH = 4.0). d Long-term filtration performance of MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membrane at 0.5 bar. Inset in d: Permeation flux of MOPM-Fe3+/PAN membrane in pressure cycling experiment. Error bars represent standard deviations for 3 measurements