Literature DB >> 10520951

The role of intermolecular interactions: studies on model systems for bacterial biofilms.

C Mayer1, R Moritz, C Kirschner, W Borchard, R Maibaum, J Wingender, H C Flemming.   

Abstract

The mechanical stability of biofilms and other microbial aggregates is of great importance for both the maintenance of biofilm processes and the removal of undesired biofilms. The binding forces are weak interactions such as London dispersion forces, electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds. In a first attempt to rank their contribution, the viscosity of solutions of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from a mucoid strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is measured. In order to distinguish the binding forces, substances are chosen which individually address the different types of bonds. Polyacrylic acid is identified as a suitable model system for EPS when molecular interactions are studied. Electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds are found to be the dominating forces among macromolecules within the biofilm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10520951     DOI: 10.1016/s0141-8130(99)00057-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Macromol        ISSN: 0141-8130            Impact factor:   6.953


  53 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms, bacterial signaling, and their ties to marine biology.

Authors:  Mark Pasmore; J William Costerton
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  The biofilm matrix.

Authors:  Hans-Curt Flemming; Jost Wingender
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-02       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Rapid chemical decontamination of infectious CJD and scrapie particles parallels treatments known to disrupt microbes and biofilms.

Authors:  Sotirios Botsios; Sarah Tittman; Laura Manuelidis
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.882

4.  High-resolution visualization of the microbial glycocalyx with low-voltage scanning electron microscopy: dependence on cationic dyes.

Authors:  Stanley L Erlandsen; Christopher J Kristich; Gary M Dunny; Carol L Wells
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.479

5.  Effect of protein, polysaccharide, and oxygen concentration profiles on biofilm cohesiveness.

Authors:  Francois Ahimou; Michael J Semmens; Greg Haugstad; Paige J Novak
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Biofilm cohesiveness measurement using a novel atomic force microscopy methodology.

Authors:  Francois Ahimou; Michael J Semmens; Paige J Novak; Greg Haugstad
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Localized removal of layers of metal, polymer, or biomaterial by ultrasound cavitation bubbles.

Authors:  David Fernandez Rivas; Bram Verhaagen; James R T Seddon; Aaldert G Zijlstra; Lei-Meng Jiang; Luc W M van der Sluis; Michel Versluis; Detlef Lohse; Han J G E Gardeniers
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.800

8.  Oral biofilm models for mechanical plaque removal.

Authors:  Martinus J Verkaik; Henk J Busscher; Minie Rustema-Abbing; Anje M Slomp; Frank Abbas; Henny C van der Mei
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Induction of the Yersinia pestis PhoP-PhoQ regulatory system in the flea and its role in producing a transmissible infection.

Authors:  Roberto Rebeil; Clayton O Jarrett; James D Driver; Robert K Ernst; Petra C F Oyston; B Joseph Hinnebusch
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Microbial Biodeterioration of Cultural Heritage: Events, Colonization, and Analyses.

Authors:  Abhishek Negi; Indira P Sarethy
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 4.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.