Matthew W Segar1, Muthiah Vaduganathan2, Kershaw V Patel1, Darren K McGuire1, Javed Butler3, Gregg C Fonarow4, Mujeeb Basit1, Vaishnavi Kannan5, Justin L Grodin1, Brendan Everett2, Duwayne Willett1, Jarett Berry1, Ambarish Pandey6. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 2. Brigham and Women's Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS. 4. Division of Cardiology, Ahmanson-UCLA Cardiomyopathy Center, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA. 5. Department of Health System Information Resources (Clinical Informatics), University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX. 6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX ambarish.pandey@utsouthwestern.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a novel, machine learning-derived model to predict the risk of heart failure (HF) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from 8,756 patients free at baseline of HF, with <10% missing data, and enrolled in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, we used random survival forest (RSF) methods, a nonparametric decision tree machine learning approach, to identify predictors of incident HF. The RSF model was externally validated in a cohort of individuals with T2DM using the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 319 patients (3.6%) developed incident HF. The RSF models demonstrated better discrimination than the best performing Cox-based method (C-index 0.77 [95% CI 0.75-0.80] vs. 0.73 [0.70-0.76] respectively) and had acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic χ2 = 9.63, P = 0.29) in the internal validation data set. From the identified predictors, an integer-based risk score for 5-year HF incidence was created: the WATCH-DM (Weight [BMI], Age, hyperTension, Creatinine, HDL-C, Diabetes control [fasting plasma glucose], QRS Duration, MI, and CABG) risk score. Each 1-unit increment in the risk score was associated with a 24% higher relative risk of HF within 5 years. The cumulative 5-year incidence of HF increased in a graded fashion from 1.1% in quintile 1 (WATCH-DM score ≤7) to 17.4% in quintile 5 (WATCH-DM score ≥14). In the external validation cohort, the RSF-based risk prediction model and the WATCH-DM risk score performed well with good discrimination (C-index = 0.74 and 0.70, respectively), acceptable calibration (P ≥0.20 for both), and broad risk stratification (5-year HF risk range from 2.5 to 18.7% across quintiles 1-5). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a novel, machine learning-derived risk score that integrates readily available clinical, laboratory, and electrocardiographic variables to predict the risk of HF among outpatients with T2DM.
OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a novel, machine learning-derived model to predict the risk of heart failure (HF) among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using data from 8,756 patients free at baseline of HF, with <10% missing data, and enrolled in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, we used random survival forest (RSF) methods, a nonparametric decision tree machine learning approach, to identify predictors of incident HF. The RSF model was externally validated in a cohort of individuals with T2DM using the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT). RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 4.9 years, 319 patients (3.6%) developed incident HF. The RSF models demonstrated better discrimination than the best performing Cox-based method (C-index 0.77 [95% CI 0.75-0.80] vs. 0.73 [0.70-0.76] respectively) and had acceptable calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic χ2 = 9.63, P = 0.29) in the internal validation data set. From the identified predictors, an integer-based risk score for 5-year HF incidence was created: the WATCH-DM (Weight [BMI], Age, hyperTension, Creatinine, HDL-C, Diabetes control [fasting plasma glucose], QRS Duration, MI, and CABG) risk score. Each 1-unit increment in the risk score was associated with a 24% higher relative risk of HF within 5 years. The cumulative 5-year incidence of HF increased in a graded fashion from 1.1% in quintile 1 (WATCH-DM score ≤7) to 17.4% in quintile 5 (WATCH-DM score ≥14). In the external validation cohort, the RSF-based risk prediction model and the WATCH-DM risk score performed well with good discrimination (C-index = 0.74 and 0.70, respectively), acceptable calibration (P ≥0.20 for both), and broad risk stratification (5-year HF risk range from 2.5 to 18.7% across quintiles 1-5). CONCLUSIONS: We developed and validated a novel, machine learning-derived risk score that integrates readily available clinical, laboratory, and electrocardiographic variables to predict the risk of HF among outpatients with T2DM.
Authors: Peter Glynn; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Matthew J Feinstein; Mercedes Carnethon; Sadiya S Khan Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hemant Ishwaran; Thomas A Gerds; Udaya B Kogalur; Richard D Moore; Stephen J Gange; Bryan M Lau Journal: Biostatistics Date: 2014-04-11 Impact factor: 5.899
Authors: Sandeep R Das; Brendan M Everett; Kim K Birtcher; Jenifer M Brown; William T Cefalu; James L Januzzi; Rita Rastogi Kalyani; Mikhail Kosiborod; Melissa L Magwire; Pamela B Morris; Laurence S Sperling Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Bruce Neal; Vlado Perkovic; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Dick de Zeeuw; Greg Fulcher; Ngozi Erondu; Wayne Shaw; Gordon Law; Mehul Desai; David R Matthews Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Brendan M Everett; Maria Mori Brooks; Helen E A Vlachos; Bernard R Chaitman; Robert L Frye; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-08-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Barry R Davis; John B Kostis; Lara M Simpson; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Paula T Einhorn; Michael A Farber; Charles E Ford; Daniel Levy; Barry M Massie; Shah Nawaz Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-11-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: David A McAllister; Stephanie H Read; Jan Kerssens; Shona Livingstone; Stuart McGurnaghan; Pardeep Jhund; John Petrie; Naveed Sattar; Colin Fischbacher; Soren Lund Kristensen; John McMurray; Helen M Colhoun; Sarah H Wild Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Sadiya S Khan; Noam Barda; Philip Greenland; Noa Dagan; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Ran Balicer; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Kershaw V Patel; Matthew W Segar; Carl J Lavie; Nitin Kondamudi; Ian J Neeland; Jaime P Almandoz; Corby K Martin; Salvatore Carbone; Javed Butler; Tiffany M Powell-Wiley; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Circulation Date: 2021-12-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew W Segar; Kershaw V Patel; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Melissa C Caughey; Byron C Jaeger; Mujeeb Basit; Duwayne Willett; Javed Butler; Partho P Sengupta; Thomas J Wang; Darren K McGuire; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-03-13 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Arjun Sinha; Deepak K Gupta; Clyde W Yancy; Sanjiv J Shah; Laura J Rasmussen-Torvik; Elizabeth M McNally; Philip Greenland; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Sadiya S Khan Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Matthew W Segar; Kershaw V Patel; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Melissa C Caughey; Javed Butler; Gregg C Fonarow; Justin L Grodin; Darren K McGuire; Ambarish Pandey Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 19.112