Literature DB >> 19001024

Heart failure with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction in the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial.

Barry R Davis1, John B Kostis, Lara M Simpson, Henry R Black, William C Cushman, Paula T Einhorn, Michael A Farber, Charles E Ford, Daniel Levy, Barry M Massie, Shah Nawaz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) developing in hypertensive patients may occur with preserved or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (PEF [>or=50%] or REF [<50%]). In the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), 42 418 high-risk hypertensive patients were randomized to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin, providing an opportunity to compare these treatments with regard to occurrence of hospitalized HFPEF or HFREF. METHODS AND
RESULTS: HF diagnostic criteria were prespecified in the ALLHAT protocol. EF estimated by contrast ventriculography, echocardiography, or radionuclide study was available in 910 of 1367 patients (66.6%) with hospitalized events meeting ALLHAT criteria. Cox regression models adjusted for baseline characteristics were used to examine treatment differences for HF (overall and by PEF and REF). HF case fatality rates were examined. Of those with EF data, 44.4% had HFPEF and 55.6% had HFREF. Chlorthalidone reduced the risk of HFPEF compared with amlodipine, lisinopril, or doxazosin; the hazard ratios were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 0.91; P=0.009), 0.74 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97; P=0.032), and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.38 to 0.73; P<0.001), respectively. Chlorthalidone reduced the risk of HFREF compared with amlodipine or doxazosin; the hazard ratios were 0.74 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.94; P=0.013) and 0.61 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.79; P<0.001), respectively. Chlorthalidone was similar to lisinopril with regard to incidence of HFREF (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.40; P=0.596). After HF onset, death occurred in 29.2% of participants (chlorthalidone/amlodipine/lisinopril) with new-onset HFPEF versus 41.9% in those with HFREF (P<0.001; median follow-up, 1.74 years); and in the chlorthalidone/doxazosin comparison that was terminated early, 20.0% of HFPEF and 26.0% of HFREF patients died (P=0.185; median follow-up, 1.55 years).
CONCLUSIONS: In ALLHAT, with adjudicated outcomes, chlorthalidone significantly reduced the occurrence of new-onset hospitalized HFPEF and HFREF compared with amlodipine and doxazosin. Chlorthalidone also reduced the incidence of new-onset HFPEF compared with lisinopril. Among high-risk hypertensive men and women, HFPEF has a better prognosis than HFREF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19001024      PMCID: PMC2775475          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.762229

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  44 in total

1.  Therapy for diastolic heart failure: on the road from myths to multicenter trials.

Authors:  D W Kitzman
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.712

Review 2.  New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: Part I: diagnosis, prognosis, and measurements of diastolic function.

Authors:  Michael R Zile; Dirk L Brutsaert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: Part II: causal mechanisms and treatment.

Authors:  Michael R Zile; Dirk L Brutsaert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Doxazosin and congestive heart failure.

Authors:  F H Messerli
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  The pathogenesis of acute pulmonary edema associated with hypertension.

Authors:  S K Gandhi; J C Powers; A M Nomeir; K Fowle; D W Kitzman; K M Rankin; W C Little
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Congestive heart failure with preserved systolic function in a statewide sample of community hospitals.

Authors:  K W Dauterman; A S Go; R Rowell; T Gebretsadik; S Gettner; B M Massie
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.712

7.  Major cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients randomized to doxazosin vs chlorthalidone: the antihypertensive and lipid-lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial (ALLHAT). ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Congestive heart failure despite normal left ventricular systolic function in a population-based sample: the Strong Heart Study.

Authors:  R B Devereux; M J Roman; J E Liu; T K Welty; E T Lee; R Rodeheffer; R R Fabsitz; B V Howard
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Importance of heart failure with preserved systolic function in patients > or = 65 years of age. CHS Research Group. Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  D W Kitzman; J M Gardin; J S Gottdiener; A Arnold; R Boineau; G Aurigemma; E K Marino; M Lyles; M Cushman; P L Enright
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in cardiovascular risk populations: a practical approach to identify the patient who will benefit most.

Authors:  Folkert W Asselbergs; Wiek H van Gilst
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.161

View more
  64 in total

1.  Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction: treatments for a complex syndrome?

Authors:  Samuel Bernard; Mathew S Maurer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-08

Review 2.  [Treatment of progressive heart failure: pharmacotherapy, resynchronization (CRT), surgery].

Authors:  Bernhard Maisch; Sabine Pankuweit
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Heart failure in Tanzania and Sweden: Comparative characterization and prognosis in the Tanzania Heart Failure (TaHeF) study and the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF).

Authors:  Abel Makubi; Camilla Hage; Ulrik Sartipy; Johnson Lwakatare; Mohammed Janabi; Peter Kisenge; Ulf Dahlström; Lars Rydén; Julie Makani; Lars H Lund
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 4.  Novel paradigms in the therapeutic management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: clinical perspectives.

Authors:  Fayez El Shear
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 5.  Phenotype-Specific Treatment of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multiorgan Roadmap.

Authors:  Sanjiv J Shah; Dalane W Kitzman; Barry A Borlaug; Loek van Heerebeek; Michael R Zile; David A Kass; Walter J Paulus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  Cytoskeletal regulation of TRPC channels in the cardiorenal system.

Authors:  Jonathan A Stiber; Youlan Tang; TianYu Li; Paul B Rosenberg
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 7.  Current Management and Future Directions of Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: a Contemporary Review.

Authors:  Chayakrit Krittanawong; Marrick L Kukin
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-20

Review 8.  Ventricular remodeling in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Amil M Shah
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-12

9.  Treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Barry A Borlaug
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02

Review 10.  Diastolic and systolic heart failure: different stages or distinct phenotypes of the heart failure syndrome?

Authors:  Jean G F Bronzwaer; Walter J Paulus
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.