| Literature DB >> 31518933 |
Shoshannah Eggers1, Nasia Safdar2, Ajay K Sethi3, Garret Suen4, Paul E Peppard5, Ashley E Kates6, Joseph H Skarlupka7, Marty Kanarek8, Kristen M C Malecki9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lead (Pb) is a ubiquitous environmental contaminant with an array of detrimental health effects in children and adults, including neurological and immune dysfunction. Emerging evidence suggests that Pb exposure may alter the composition of the gut microbiota, however few studies have examined this association in human populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between urinary Pb concentration and the composition of the adult gut microbiota in a population-based sample of adults.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Epidemiology; Heavy metals; Lead; Microbiome; Microbiota
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31518933 PMCID: PMC7230144 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Int ISSN: 0160-4120 Impact factor: 13.352
Distribution of demographics and potential covariates by creatinine-adjusted urinary Pb quartile.
| Total | Quartile 1 | Quartile 2 | Quartile 3 | Quartile 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Exposure | N | Range (N) | Range (N) | Range (N) | Range (N) |
| Creatinine-adjusted urinary Pb (pg/L) | 696 | 0.03–0.24 (174) | 0.24–0.39 (174) | 0.39–0.60 (174) | 0.60–15.31 (174) |
| Categorical covariates | N |
|
|
|
|
| Age[ | 696 | ||||
| 18–29 | 58 | 36 (62.1) | 19 (32.6) | 2 (3.4) | 1 (1.7) |
| 30–49 | 172 | 84 (48.8) | 49 (28.4) | 19 (11.0) | 20 (11.6) |
| 50–69 | 339 | 49 (14.5) | 78 (23) | 115 (33.9) | 97 (28.6) |
| ≥ 70 | 127 | 5 (3.9) | 28 (22) | 38 (29.9) | 56 (44.1) |
| Gender[ | 696 | ||||
| Female | 399 | 87 (21.8) | 90 (22.6) | 106 (26.6) | 116 (29.1) |
| Male | 297 | 87 (29.3) | 84 (28.3) | 68 (22.9) | 58 (19.5) |
| Race/ethnicity | 695 | ||||
| Non-Hispanic White | 577 | 138 (23.9) | 145 (25.1) | 153 (26.5) | 141 (24.4) |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 70 | 21 (30.0) | 20 (28.6) | 14 (20.0) | 15 (21.4) |
| Hispanic | 24 | 9 (37.5) | 6 (25.0) | 3 (12.5) | 6 (25.0) |
| Non-Hispanic other | 24 | 5 (20.8) | 3 (12.5) | 4 (16.7) | 12 (50.0) |
| Family income | 696 | ||||
| Low income | 204 | 49 (24.0) | 52 (25.5) | 47 (23.0) | 56 (27.5) |
| Middle income | 220 | 62 (28.2) | 53 (24.1) | 51 (23.2) | 54 (24.5) |
| High income | 272 | 63 (23.2) | 69 (25.4) | 76 (27.9) | 64 (23.5) |
| Education | 695 | ||||
| ≤ High School | 187 | 34 (18.2) | 49 (26.2) | 47 (25.1) | 57 (30.5) |
| Some college | 247 | 56 (22.7) | 65 (26.3) | 64 (25.9) | 62 (25.1) |
| ≥ Bachelor’s degree | 261 | 84 (32.2) | 60 (23.0) | 63 (24.1) | 54 (20.7) |
| Smoking[ | 685 | ||||
| Current | 93 | 14 (15.1) | 30 (32.3) | 21 (22.6) | 28 (30.1) |
| Former | 205 | 33 (16.1) | 51 (24.9) | 59 (28.8) | 62 (30.2) |
| Never | 387 | 123 (31.8) | 93 (24.0) | 91 (23.5) | 80 (20.7) |
| Antibiotic use | 653 | ||||
| Yes | 228 | 58 (25.4) | 58 (25.4) | 51 (22.4) | 61 (26.8) |
| No | 425 | 104 (24.5) | 109 (25.6) | 117 (27.5) | 95 (22.4) |
| Indoor pet[ | 693 | ||||
| Yes | 379 | 115 (30.3) | 97 (25.6) | 84 (22.2) | 83 (21.9) |
| No | 314 | 58 (18.5) | 77 (24.5) | 90 (28.7) | 89 (28.3) |
| BMI | 690 | ||||
| Underweight/normal | 165 | 40 (24.2) | 38 (23.0) | 42 (25.5) | 45 (27.3) |
| Overweight/obese | 525 | 133 (25.3) | 136 (25.9) | 131 (25.0) | 125 (23.8) |
| Urbanicity | 695 | ||||
| Urban | 460 | 119 (25.9) | 124 (27.0) | 109 (23.7) | 108 (23.5) |
| Suburban | 76 | 23 (30.3) | 15 (19.7) | 20 (26.3) | 18 (23.7) |
| Rural | 159 | 32 (20.1) | 34 (21.4) | 45 (28.3) | 48 (30.2) |
| Length of residence[ | 688 | ||||
| < 1 year | 62 | 23 (37.1) | 19 (30.6) | 12 (19.5) | 8 (12.9) |
| 1–3 years | 105 | 35 (33.3) | 31 (29.5) | 20 (19.0) | 19 (18.1) |
| 3–10years | 145 | 50 (34.5) | 42 (29.0) | 27 (18.6) | 26 (17.9) |
| > 10years | 376 | 64 (17.0) | 82 (21.8) | 112 (29.8) | 118 (31.4) |
| Continuous covariates | N | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE |
| Dietary iron (mg/1000 Kcal) | 615 | 7.6 ± 0.24 | 7.3 ± 0.17 | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 7.6 ± 0.18 |
| Dietary calcium (mg/1000 Kcal) | 615 | 719.4 ± 42.56 | 732.8 ± 32.94 | 771.5 ± 39.57 | 799.2 ± 43.84 |
| Dietary fiber[ | 615 | 9.5 ± 0.3 | 10.2 ± 0.36 | 12.3 ± 0.41 | 11.9 ± 0.41 |
| Dietary vitamin C (mg/1000 Kcal) | 615 | 52 ± 2.81 | 59 ± 2.94 | 66.3 ± 3.34 | 64.2 ± 3.17 |
Data come from the microbiome study sample of the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin 2016–2017. Urinary Pb geometric mean statistics are not adjusted for creatinine concentration or household clustering. Categorical distribution statistics calculated using frequency tables adjusted for household clustering, including p-values from the χ2 statistic. Continuous covariate statistics calculated including adjustment for household clustering, including p for trend.
P≤0.05
P≤0.01.
P≤0.0001.
Fig. 1.Gut Bacterial Phyla by Urinary Pb Quartile.
Relative abundance of the five most abundant bacterial phyla found in the study samples by creatinine-adjusted urinary Pb quartiles.
Fig. 2.Most Abundant OTUs by Urinary Pb Quartile.
Abundance of the top 20 most abundant OTUs in participants from the first and fourth quartiles of creatinine-adjusted urinary Pb level.
Effect of Urinary Lead concentration on α-diversity (Inverse-Simpson) and richness (ACE).
| Outcome: | Inverse-Simpson | ACE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
|
| ||||
| Variable | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) | β (95% CI) |
|
| ||||
| Urine Pb[ | 0.82 (0.12, 1.53)[ | 0.93 (−0.08, 1.93) | 5.11 (14.67, 34.76)[ | 17.43 (5.23, 29.63)[ |
| Age | 0.03 (−0.01, 0.07) | 0.39 (−0.2, 0.97) | ||
| Gender (Female) | −1.00 (−2.1, 0.11) | 4.37 (−10.88, 19.61) | ||
| BMI | −0.05 (−0.13, 0.04) | −1.59 (−2.71, −0.46)[ | ||
| Antibiotics (Yes) | −0.89 (−2.04, 0.26) | −22.55 (−39.8, −5.30)[ | ||
| Race/ethnicity | ||||
| Non-Hispanic White | Reference | Reference | ||
| Non-Hispanic Black | 0.80 (−0.91, 2.52) | 34.31 (3.51, 65.11)[ | ||
| Hispanic | 1.72 (−1.14, 4.58) | 24.6 (−20.53, 69.72) | ||
| Non-Hispanic other | −0.58 (−3.27, 2.11) | −19.23 (−58.15, 19.70) | ||
| Education | ||||
| ≤ High School | Reference | Reference | ||
| Some college | 2.21 (0.95, 3.46) | 14.58 (−5.56, 34.72) | ||
| ≥ Bachelor’s Degree | 2.75 (1.39, 4.11)[ | 21.57 (0.02, 43.13)[ | ||
| Smoking | ||||
| Never | Reference | Reference | ||
| Current | −1.37 (−2.98, 0.25) | −11.87 (−38.93, 15.19) | ||
| Former | −0.39 (−1.67, 0.9) | 2.93 (−17.03, 22.90) | ||
| Fiber (g/1000 Kcal) | 0.07 (−0.06, 0.2) | 2.67 (0.64, 4.7)[ | ||
| Urbanicity | ||||
| Urban | Reference | Reference | ||
| Suburban | 1.79 (0.07, 3.5)[ | 17.38 (−3.80, 38.56) | ||
| Rural | 0.52 (−1.06, 2.1) | 10.52 (−12.43, 33.46) | ||
| Indoor pet (Yes) | −1.70 (−2.84, −0.55)[ | −10.41 (−27.37, 6.56) | ||
Data come from the microbiome study sample of the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin 2016–2017.
Abbreviations: Pb = lead; ACE = abundance-based coverage estimator; BMI = body mass index.
Results are shown from linear regression models, unadjusted and adjusted for the covariates shown above.
Creatinine-adjusted and log transformed.
P≤0.05.
P≤0.01.
P≤0.001.
P≤0.0001
Association of urinary lead with α-diversity (Inverse-Simpson), richness (ACE), stratified by effect modifiers.
| Outcome: | Inverse-Simpson | ACE |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Stratification variable | Urine Pb[ | Urine Pb[ |
| Age | ||
| < 50 | 0.31 (−1.18, 1.80) | −2.5 (−26.1, 21.1) |
| ≥50 | 1.33 (0.03, 2.63)[ | 25.0 (10.5, 39.6)[ |
| Smoking | ||
| Current | 1.42 (−0.44, 3.29) | −16.6 (− 58.0, 24.8) |
| Former | 3.19 (0.83, 5.54) | 47.8 (17.6, 78.1) |
| Never | 0.34 (−0.85, 1.52) | 16.2 (2.5, 29.9) |
| BMI | ||
| Underweight/normal | 0.48 (−1.27, 2.23) | 19.1 ( –0.7, 39.0) |
| Overweight/obese | 1.07 (−0.03, 2.18) | 18.4 (3.4, 33.3) |
| Urbanicity | ||
| Urban | −0.29 (−1.40, 0.81) | 8.5 (−7.4, 24.5) |
| Suburban | 2.66 (0.95, 4.38) | 26.8 (8.8, 44.8) |
| Rural | 1.10 (0.44, 4.76) | 31.3 (2.6, 59.9) |
| Fiber consumption | ||
| Tertile 1 | 0.58 (−1.19, 2.35) | 5.5 (−20.1, 31.1) |
| Tertile 2 | 0.73 (−0.67, 2.13) | 26.4 (10.0, 42.7)[ |
| Tertile 3 | 0.86 (−0.99, 2.71) | 7.2 (−17.1, 31.4) |
| Antibiotic use | ||
| Yes | 0.92 (−0.68, 2.51) | 12.7 (−6.7, 32.0) |
| No | 0.75 (−0.42, 1.92) | 19.6 (4.5, 34.7) |
Data come from the microbiome study sample of the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin 2016–2017.
Abbreviations: Pb=lead; ACE=abundance-based coverage estimator; BMI=body mass index.
Linear regression estimates and confidence intervals from separate stratified analysis models for each variable. All models were adjusted by age, gender, BMI, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, fiber, urbanicity, and pets, EXCEPT for the stratification variable.
P-values shown are testing whether the adjusted regression estimate for urinary Pb in each subgroup analysis is significantly different than 0.
Creatinine-adjusted and log transformed.
P ≤ 0.05.
P ≤ 0.01.
P≤ 0.001.
Fig. 3.β-Diversity distance by Urinary Pb Quartile.
Bray-Curtis dissimilarity distances, colored by quartile of creatinine-adjusted urinary Pb level. Distance between dots represents the difference in OTU composition between samples.
Association of urinary lead concentration with β-diversity (Bray-Curtis), unadjusted and adjusted for covariates.
| Outcome: | Bray-Curtis | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Unadjusted | Adjusted | |
|
| ||
| Variable | R2% (P) | R2% (P) |
| Urine Pb[ | 0.60 (0.001) | 0.35 (0.003) |
| Age | 1.03 (0.001) | |
| Gender (Female) | 0.49 (0.001) | |
| BMI | 0.35 (0.006) | |
| Antibiotics | ||
| Yes | 0.40 (0.003) | |
| Don’t know | 0.31 (0.020) | |
| No | Reference | |
| Race/ethnicity | ||
| Non-Hispanic White | Reference | |
| Non-Hispanic Black | 0.46 (0.001) | |
| Hispanic | 0.21 (0.177) | |
| Non-Hispanic other | 0.16 (0.495) | |
| Education | ||
| ≤ High School | Reference | |
| Some college | 0.19 (0.260) | |
| ≥ Bachelor’s Degree | 0.36 (0.005) | |
| Smoking | ||
| Never | Reference | |
| Current | 0.33 (0.010) | |
| Former | 0.23 (0.103) | |
| Fiber (g/1000 Kcal) | 0.74 (0.001) | |
| Urbanicity | ||
| Urban | Reference | |
| Suburban | 0.19 (0.305) | |
| Rural | 0.39 (0.001) | |
| Indoor pet (Yes) | 0.19 (0.279) | |
Data come from the microbiome study sample of the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin 2016–2017.
Abbreviations: Pb=lead; BMI=body mass index.
Results shown from PERMANOVA models, unadjusted and adjusted for covariates shown above.
Creatinine-adjusted and log transformed.
Specific bacterial taxa associated with level of urinary Pb concentration, adjusted for covariates.
| Uncorrected P-value | Direction | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Two-part | Zero-part | Positive-part | ||
|
| ||||
| Phylum | ||||
| Proteobacteria | 0.0236 | 0.0006[ | 0.9620 | ↑ |
| Class | ||||
| Alphaproteobacteria | 0.6436 | 0.0198 | 0.6436 | ↑ |
| Betaproteobacteria | 0.5050 | 0.0099 | 0.5050 | ↑ |
| Deltaproteobacteria | 0.0119 | 0.0119 | 1.0000 | ↑ |
| Gammaproteobacteria | 0.0317 | 0.7030 | 0.0307 | ↑ |
| Order | ||||
| Burkholderiales | 0.0044 | 0.0002 | 0.7822 | ↑ |
| Clostridiales | 0.0008 | 0.1582 | 0.0008 | ↓ |
| Desulfovibrionales | 0.0921 | 0.0277 | 0.8208 | ↑ |
| Rhizobiales | 0.1683 | 0.0099 | 0.1683 | ↑ |
| Family | ||||
| Alcaligenaceae | 0.4356 | 0.0099 | 0.4356 | ↑ |
| Barnesiellaceae | 0.2574 | 0.0495 | 0.2574 | ↑ |
| Brucellaceae | 0.0248 | 0.0248 | 1.0000 | ↑ |
| Clostridiaceae | 0.0218 | 0.0406 | 0.1416 | ↓ |
| Desulfovibrionaceae | 0.0644 | 0.0178 | 0.4772 | ↑ |
| Enterococcaceae | 0.0129 | 0.9307 | 0.0129 | ↑ |
| Lactobacillaceae | 0.1881 | 0.0396 | 0.5446 | ↓ |
| Oxalobacteraceae | 0.3267 | 0.0495 | 0.3267 | ↑ |
| Rikenellaceae | 0.0584 | 0.0208 | 1.0000 | ↑ |
| Genus | ||||
|
| 0.0455 | 0.7406 | 0.0455 | ↓ |
|
| 0.0238 | 0.0099 | 0.3178 | ↓ |
|
| 0.8119 | 0.0396 | 0.8119 | ↑ |
|
| 0.0149 | 0.0525 | 0.0663 | ↑ |
|
| 0.0124 | 0.0124 | 1.0000 | ↓ |
|
| 0.0208 | 0.0614 | 0.0347 | ↑ |
Data come from the microbiome study sample of the Survey of the Health of Wisconsin 2016–2017.
Analysis was performed using Quasi Conditional Association Test using Generalized Estimating Equations (QCAT-GEE), adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, antibiotic use, race/ethnicity, education, smoking, fiber consumption, urbanicity, and indoor pets.
Indicates p < 0.05 after FDR correction.