| Literature DB >> 31517550 |
Min Tan1, Jing Fang1, Qianqian Xu1, Cong Zhang1, Guming Zou1, Min Wang1, Wenge Li1.
Abstract
Purpose: Typically, IgA nephropathy is a slowly progressive type of glomerulonephritis. High-grade proteinuria and hypertension are predictors of reduced kidney function. However, we found some normotensive patients with mild proteinuria could exhibit impaired renal function at the time of IgAN diagnosis. We therefore conduct a study to highlight the occurrence of these cases and to define their clinical characteristics and outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: IgA nephropathy; hypertension; pathology; proteinuria; renal failure
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31517550 PMCID: PMC6758703 DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2019.1654512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ren Fail ISSN: 0886-022X Impact factor: 2.606
Figure 1.The flow chart of the 104 patients selected out of 1069 original cohort.
Comparison of clinical features between IgAN patients in ischemic sclerosis group, crescent group and normal renal function group.
| Ischemic sclerosis group | Crescent group | IgAN with normal renal function | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male gender (N[%]) | 60 (75.9%)a* | 16 (64.0%) | 56 (56.0%) |
| Age, years (mean[SD]) | 31.6 ± 15.9 | 32.1 ± 9.7 | 31.8 ± 5.4 |
| Pre-biopsy history (mean[SD]) | 13.1 ± 8.2 | 10.6 ± 6.7 | 11.5 ± 11.3 |
| Macroscopic hematuria (N[%]) | 1 (1.3%)a,b** | 8 (32.0%) | 39 (39.0%) |
| Only Hematuria (N[%]) | 0 | 0 | 24 (24.0%)b,c** |
| Only Proteinuria (N[%]) | 21 (26.6%)a,b** | 0 | 9 (9.0%) |
| Prodromal infection (N[%]) | 11 (13.9%)a,b** | 10 (40.0%) | 37 (37.0%) |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 117 ± 41.0 | 123 ± 38.6 | 117 ± 45.0 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) 69 ± 31 | 74 ± 36 | 70 ± 31 | |
| SCr (μmol/L, mean[SD]) | 140 ± 57 | 142 ± 88 | 73 ± 20b,c** |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 55.3 ± 5.3 | 53.5 ± 9.8 | 90.8 ± 20.1b,c** |
| Proteinuria (g/24 h) | 0.53 ± 0.35 | 0.60 ± 0.32 | 0.54 ± 0.28 |
| Serum Uric Acid (mmol/L) | 455 ± 116b* | 430 ± 80 | 365 ± 98b,c** |
| Serum IgA higher than normal (N,%) | 9 (11.4%)b* | 9 (36.0%) | 23 (23.0%) |
BP: blood pressure; Scr: serum creatinine; eGFR: estimated GFR.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. aversus IgAN with normal renal function group. bversus crescent group; cversus ischemic sclerosis group.
Comparison of pathological features between IgAN patients in ischemic sclerosis group, crescent group and normal renal function group.
| Ischemic sclerosis group | Crescent group | IgAN with normal renal function | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pathological features | |||
| Non-ischemic global sclerosis (%) | 3.0 (0–25.0) | 3.77 (0–16.7) | 2.02 (0–15.4) |
| Ischemic sclerosis (%) | 30.7 (20.0–75.0)a,b** | 6.37 (0–18.2) | 2.83 (0–18.2) |
| Segmental sclerosis (%) | 1.54 (0–36..4) | 3.15 (0–9.7 ) | 1.35 (0–10.0) |
| Crescents (%) | 0.31 (0–6.67) | 31.7 (20–41.9)a,c** | 1.15 (0–15.8) |
| Cellular crescents (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fibrocellular crescents (%) | 0 | 2.64 (0–22.2) | 0.73 (0–12.5) |
| Fibrous crescents (%) | 0.31 (0–6.67) | 29.1 (20–41.9)a,c** | 1.43 (0–15.8) |
| MSI (mean[SD]) | 1.11 (1.0–2.0) | 1.36 (1.0–2.0) | 1.24 (1.0–2.0) |
| EPI (mean[SD]) | 1.01 (0–2.0) | 1.09 (0–2.0) | 1.01 (1.0–2.0) |
| TI (mean[SD] | 1.39 (0–3.0) | 1.60 (0–3.0) | 1.04 (0–3.0)b,c* |
| Renal arteriole lesions | |||
| Mild arterial lesion (N,%) | 20 (25.3%)a,b,** | 15 (60.0%) | 68 (68.0%) |
| Severe arterial lesion (N,%) | 59 (74.7%)a,b,** | 10 (40.0%) | 32 (32.0%) |
| Oxford classification | |||
| M1 | 37 (46.8%) | 12 (48.0%) | 45 (45.0%) |
| E1 | 8 (10.1%) | 6 (24.0%) | 10 (10.0%) |
| S1 | 21 (26.6%) | 10 (40.0%)a* | 13 (13.0%) |
| T | |||
| T0 | 65 (82.3%) | 20 (80.0%) | 98 (98.0%)b,c* |
| T1 | 14 (17.7%) | 5 (20.0%) | 2 (2.0%)b,c* |
| T2 | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
MSI: Mesangial proliferation index; EPI: Endothelial proliferation index; TI: Tubulointerstitial index; SD: standard deviation.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. aversus IgAN with normal renal function group. bversus crescent group; cversus ischemic sclerosis group.
The data of patients at last follow-up in different groups.
| IgAN with impaired renal function | IgAN with normal | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ischemic sclerosis group | Crescent group | renal function | |
| Follow-up time (months) | 61 | 58 | 51 |
| At time of biopsy | |||
| Hypertension ( | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Proteinuria (g/24h) | 0.67 ± 0.31 | 0.68 ± 0.32 | 0.47 ± 0.28 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 140 ± 52 | 147 ± 88 | 80 ± 20 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 52.5 ± 7.3 | 51.7 ± 5.9 | 92.8 ± 27.1 |
| Last follow up | |||
| Hypertension ( | 25 (32.5%)a* | 6 (24.0%)a* | 8 (8.0%) |
| Proteinuria (g/24h) | 0.78 ± 0.21 | 1.30 ± 0.32a,b* | 0.61 ± 0.30 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 160 ± 48 | 196 ± 98a**,b* | 83 ± 20 |
| eGFR (ml/min) | 47.5 ± 8.3 | 37.7 ± 10.0a**,b* | 91.5 ± 31.2 |
| Doubling of Scr ( | 4 (5.2%) | 6 (24.0%)a**,b* | 2 (2.0%) |
| Corticosteroid treatment ( | 1 (1.3%) | 4 (16.0%)a,b* | 3 (3.0%) |
Scr: serum creatinine; eGFR: estimated GFR.
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. aversus IgAN with normal renal function group. bversus ischemic sclerosis group.
Figure 2.Kidney survival curve in IgAN patients with normal renal function and the two subgroups of IgAN patients with impaired renal function. The primary endpoint was a doubling of the primary baseline serum creatinine. Patients in crescent group had a poor outcome compared with patients in normal renal function (P < 0.001, log-rank test) and patients in ischemic sclerosis group (P = 0.015, log-rank test).