Literature DB >> 31515770

The impact of electric generation capacity by renewable and non-renewable energy in Brazilian economic growth.

Maiara de Oliveira Noronha1, Roselaine Ruviaro Zanini2, Adriano Mendonça Souza2.   

Abstract

Renewable sources are relevant in a country's energy planning because they are linked to the creation of opportunities for technological, economic, and productive development guided by the principles of sustainability. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the relation between electric generation capacity by renewable and non-renewable energies and Brazilian socioeconomic variables. The analysis of the interrelationships between electricity generation capacity and economic growth in Brazil, from April 2009 to March 2017, was carried out by the vector autoregressive and autoregressive distributed lag methodologies. It was verified that the variance of employment is explained by renewable sources: hydroelectric in 7.71%, biomass in 1.99%, wind energy in 3.13%, and solar energy in 10.58%. While, the GDP variance is explained in 3.15% by hydroelectric energy, 0.06% by biomass, 1.70% by wind energy, and 17.38% by solar energy. The export variance is explained by renewable sources: hydroelectric 2.48%, biomass 0.39%, wind energy 2.34%, and solar energy 17.58%. Finally, the variance of the minimum wage is explained by hydroelectric energy in 1.48%, biomass in 5.09%, wind energy in 9.09%, and solar energy in 10.67%. An ARDL (1, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 3, 2, 0, 2, 0, 2) model was also adjusted for natural gas, with AIC (13.082) and BIC (13.739), and the ARDL (1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 3, 0, 0, 4) model adjusted for hydroelectric power, with AIC (13.633) and BIC (14.189), considering the variables' order cited above. Through the adjustment of the ARDL model, it was verified that there is a long-term influence of socioeconomic variables on electricity production variables, both renewable and non-renewable ones. The analysis of the impulse response function and the variance decomposition allowed us to verify that the installed capacity for production of electric energy exerts influence on Brazilian socioeconomic variables considered in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Economic growth; Granger causality; Non-renewable energies; Renewable energy; Response impulse function; Socioeconomic development; Variance decomposition; Vector autoregressive model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31515770     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06241-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  11 in total

1.  From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Sachs
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization.

Authors:  Nathan S Lewis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future.

Authors:  Steven Chu; Arun Majumdar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Does financial development reduce environmental degradation? Evidence from a panel study of 129 countries.

Authors:  Usama Al-Mulali; Chor Foon Tang; Ilhan Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The significance of renewable energy use for economic output and environmental protection: evidence from the Next 11 developing economies.

Authors:  Sudharshan Reddy Paramati; Avik Sinha; Eyup Dogan
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Causality links among renewable energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in Africa: evidence from a panel ARDL-PMG approach.

Authors:  Imed Attiaoui; Hassen Toumi; Bilel Ammouri; Ilhem Gargouri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests.

Authors:  Eyup Dogan; Ilhan Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Sustainable hydropower in the 21st century.

Authors:  Emilio F Moran; Maria Claudia Lopez; Nathan Moore; Norbert Müller; David W Hyndman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The biomass distribution on Earth.

Authors:  Yinon M Bar-On; Rob Phillips; Ron Milo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals.

Authors:  Mark Stafford-Smith; David Griggs; Owen Gaffney; Farooq Ullah; Belinda Reyers; Norichika Kanie; Bjorn Stigson; Paul Shrivastava; Melissa Leach; Deborah O'Connell
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 6.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.