Literature DB >> 28293824

The influence of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and real income on CO2 emissions in the USA: evidence from structural break tests.

Eyup Dogan1, Ilhan Ozturk2.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to explore the influence of the real income (GDP), renewable energy consumption and non-renewable energy consumption on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions for the United States of America (USA) in the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) model for the period 1980-2014. The Zivot-Andrews unit root test with a structural break and the Clemente-Montanes-Reyes unit root test with a structural break report that the analyzed variables become stationary at first-differences. The Gregory-Hansen cointegration test with a structural break and the bounds testing for cointegration in the presence of a structural break show CO2 emissions, the real income, the quadratic real income, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption are cointegrated. The long-run estimates obtained from the ARDL model indicate that increases in renewable energy consumption mitigate environmental degradation whereas increases in non-renewable energy consumption contribute to CO2 emissions. In addition, the EKC hypothesis is not valid for the USA. Since we use time-series econometric approaches that account for structural break in the data, findings of this study are robust, reliable and accurate. The US government is advised to put more weights on renewable sources in energy mix, to support and encourage the use and adoption of renewable energy and clean technologies, and to increase the public awareness of renewable energy for lower levels of emissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2 emissions; EKC model; Non-renewable energy; Real GDP; Renewable energy; Structural break

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28293824     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-017-8786-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  5 in total

1.  Economic growth, combustible renewables and waste consumption, and CO₂ emissions in North Africa.

Authors:  Mehdi Ben Jebli; Slim Ben Youssef
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Causal relationship between CO₂ emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia.

Authors:  Sahbi Farhani; Ilhan Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Environmental costs and renewable energy: re-visiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve.

Authors:  Ana Jesús López-Menéndez; Rigoberto Pérez; Blanca Moreno
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 6.789

4.  An investigation on the determinants of carbon emissions for OECD countries: empirical evidence from panel models robust to heterogeneity and cross-sectional dependence.

Authors:  Eyup Dogan; Fahri Seker
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  CO2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA.

Authors:  Eyup Dogan; Berna Turkekul
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.223

  5 in total
  21 in total

1.  Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states.

Authors:  Ehsan Rasoulinezhad; Behnaz Saboori
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Environmental Kuznets curve revisit in Central Asia: the roles of urbanization and renewable energy.

Authors:  Shun Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in G7 countries: the role of renewable energy consumption and trade.

Authors:  Syed Ali Raza; Nida Shah
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-07-14       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  The impact of biomass energy consumption on pollution: evidence from 80 developed and developing countries.

Authors:  Sakiru Adebola Solarin; Usama Al-Mulali; Gerald Goh Guan Gan; Muhammad Shahbaz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in CO2 emissions: a disaggregate analysis of Pakistan.

Authors:  Syed Anees Haider Zaidi; Fujun Hou; Faisal Mehmood Mirza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Determinants of pollution and the role of the military sector: evidence from a maximum likelihood approach with two structural breaks in the USA.

Authors:  Sakiru Adebola Solarin; Usama Al-Mulali; Ilhan Ozturk
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Time-varying causality between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: evidence from US states.

Authors:  Panayiotis Tzeremes
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Stochastic convergence of renewable energy consumption in OECD countries: a fractional integration approach.

Authors:  Sakiru Adebola Solarin; Luis Alberiko Gil-Alana; Usama Al-Mulali
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Decoupling emissions of greenhouse gas, urbanization, energy and income: analysis from the economy of China.

Authors:  Tianqiong Wang; Joshua Sunday Riti; Yang Shu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Does ICT lessen CO2 emissions for fast-emerging economies? An application of the heterogeneous panel estimations.

Authors:  Faisal Faisal; Turgut Tursoy; Ruqiya Pervaiz
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.