Shuqiang Chen1, Meizi Zhang2, Li Li1, Ming Wang1, Yongqian Shi1, Hengde Zhang1, Bin Kang1, Na Tang3, Bo Li4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China. 2. Reproductive Medicine Center, Tianjin Frist Central Hospital, Tianjin, 300192, China. 3. Shaanxi Institute for Food and Drug Control, Xi'an, 710038, People's Republic of China. tnlb2000@126.com. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tangdu Hospital, the Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710038, China. lbtn2000@126.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Studies on rodents have shown that assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are associated with perturbation of genomic imprinting in blastocyst-stage embryos. However, the vulnerable developmental window for ART influence on the genomic imprinting of embryos is still undetermined. The purpose of this study was to establish the specific embryonic development stage at which the loss of methylation of H19 imprinting control regions (ICRs) was caused by ART occurrence. Additionally, we explored protocols to safeguard against possible negative impacts of ART on embryo H19 imprinting. METHODS: Mouse embryos were generated under four different experimental conditions, divided into four groups: control, in vitro culture (IVC), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The methylation levels of H19 ICR of the grouped or individual embryos were analyzed by bisulfite-sequencing PCR. RESULTS: Our data showed that the loss of methylation of H19 ICR in mouse blastocysts was inflicted to a similar extent by IVC, IVF, and ICSI. Specifically, we observed a significant loss of methylation of H19 ICR between the mouse 8-cell and morula stages. In addition, we revealed that the transfer of mouse embryos generated by ARTs in the uterus at the 8-cell stage induced the occurrence of methylation patterns in the blastocysts closer to the in vivo ones. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the loss of methylation of H19 ICR caused by ARTs occurs between the 8-cell and the morula stages, and the transfer of cleavage embryos to the uterus mitigates the loss methylation of H19 derived by mice ARTs.
PURPOSE: Studies on rodents have shown that assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) are associated with perturbation of genomic imprinting in blastocyst-stage embryos. However, the vulnerable developmental window for ART influence on the genomic imprinting of embryos is still undetermined. The purpose of this study was to establish the specific embryonic development stage at which the loss of methylation of H19 imprinting control regions (ICRs) was caused by ART occurrence. Additionally, we explored protocols to safeguard against possible negative impacts of ART on embryo H19 imprinting. METHODS:Mouse embryos were generated under four different experimental conditions, divided into four groups: control, in vitro culture (IVC), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The methylation levels of H19 ICR of the grouped or individual embryos were analyzed by bisulfite-sequencing PCR. RESULTS: Our data showed that the loss of methylation of H19 ICR in mouseblastocysts was inflicted to a similar extent by IVC, IVF, and ICSI. Specifically, we observed a significant loss of methylation of H19 ICR between the mouse 8-cell and morula stages. In addition, we revealed that the transfer of mouse embryos generated by ARTs in the uterus at the 8-cell stage induced the occurrence of methylation patterns in the blastocysts closer to the in vivo ones. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that the loss of methylation of H19 ICR caused by ARTs occurs between the 8-cell and the morula stages, and the transfer of cleavage embryos to the uterus mitigates the loss methylation of H19 derived by mice ARTs.
Entities:
Keywords:
Assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs); Genomic imprinting; Imprinting control regions (ICRs); Loss of methylation
Authors: Dorota Jurkiewicz; Monika Kugaudo; Agata Skórka; Robert Śmigiel; Marta Smyk; Elżbieta Ciara; Krystyna Chrzanowska; Małgorzata Krajewska-Walasek Journal: Am J Med Genet A Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 2.802
Authors: A P A van Montfoort; L L P Hanssen; P de Sutter; S Viville; J P M Geraedts; P de Boer Journal: Hum Reprod Update Date: 2012-01-19 Impact factor: 15.610
Authors: Nady El Hajj; Larissa Haertle; Marcus Dittrich; Sarah Denk; Harald Lehnen; Thomas Hahn; Martin Schorsch; Thomas Haaf Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2017-08-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Alex Horánszky; Jessica L Becker; Melinda Zana; Anne C Ferguson-Smith; András Dinnyés Journal: Genes (Basel) Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 4.096