Literature DB >> 28322775

Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies.

Barbara Luke1.   

Abstract

Infertility, defined as the inability to conceive within 1 year of unprotected intercourse, affects an estimated 80 million individuals worldwide, or 10-15% of couples of reproductive age. Assisted reproductive technology includes all infertility treatments to achieve conception; in vitro fertilization is the process by which an oocyte is fertilized by semen outside the body; non-in vitro fertilization assisted reproductive technology treatments include ovulation induction, artificial insemination, and intrauterine insemination. Use of assisted reproductive technology has risen steadily in the United States during the past 2 decades due to several reasons, including childbearing at older maternal ages and increasing insurance coverage. The number of in vitro fertilization cycles in the United States has nearly doubled from 2000 through 2013 and currently 1.7% of all live births in the United States are the result of this technology. Since the birth of the first child from in vitro fertilization >35 years ago, >5 million babies have been born from in vitro fertilization, half within the past 6 years. It is estimated that 1% of singletons, 19% of twins, and 25% of triplet or higher multiples are due to in vitro fertilization, and 4%, 21%, and 52%, respectively, are due to non-in vitro fertilization assisted reproductive technology. Higher plurality at birth results in a >10-fold increase in the risks for prematurity and low birthweight in twins vs singletons (adjusted odds ratio, 11.84; 95% confidence interval, 10.56-13.27 and adjusted odds ratio, 10.68; 95% confidence interval, 9.45-12.08, respectively). The use of donor oocytes is associated with increased risks for pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.78) and prematurity (adjusted odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.83). The use of thawed embryos is associated with higher risks for pregnancy-induced hypertension (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-1.57) and large-for-gestation birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence interval, 1.45-2.08). Among singletons, in vitro fertilization is associated with increased risk of severe maternal morbidity compared with fertile deliveries (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-2.88; cesarean: adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-1.98, respectively) and subfertile deliveries (vaginal: adjusted odds ratio, 1.97; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-3.00; cesarean: adjusted odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.35, respectively). Among twins, cesarean in vitro fertilization deliveries have significantly greater severe maternal morbidity compared to cesarean fertile deliveries (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.93). Subfertility, with or without in vitro fertilization or non-in vitro fertilization infertility treatments to achieve a pregnancy, is associated with increased risks of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. The major risk from in vitro fertilization treatments of multiple births (and the associated excess of perinatal morbidity) has been reduced over time, with fewer and better-quality embryos being transferred.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assisted hatching; assisted reproduction; birth defects; donor oocytes; fertile; freezing embryos; fresh embryos; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; in vitro fertilization; low birthweight; maternal and paternal age; pregnancy complications; prematurity; severe maternal morbidity; sibling studies; subfertile

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28322775     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  34 in total

1.  Health outcomes for Massachusetts infants after fresh versus frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Sunah S Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Hafsatou Diop; Charles C Coddington; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Reproductive outcomes with donor sperm in couples with severe male-factor infertility after intracytoplasmic sperm injection failures.

Authors:  He Cai; Stephan Gordts; Jianhua Sun; Bin Meng; Juanzi Shi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Potential influence of the corpus luteum on circulating reproductive and volume regulatory hormones, angiogenic and immunoregulatory factors in pregnant women.

Authors:  Kirk P Conrad; Georgia M Graham; Yueh-Yun Chi; Xiaoman Zhai; Minjie Li; R Stan Williams; Alice Rhoton-Vlasak; Mark S Segal; Charles E Wood; Maureen Keller-Wood
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 4.310

4.  Loss of methylation of H19-imprinted gene derived from assisted reproductive technologies can be mitigated by cleavage-stage embryo transfer in mice.

Authors:  Shuqiang Chen; Meizi Zhang; Li Li; Ming Wang; Yongqian Shi; Hengde Zhang; Bin Kang; Na Tang; Bo Li
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Decreased clinical pregnancy and live birth rates after short interval from delivery to subsequent assisted reproductive treatment cycle.

Authors:  Molly M Quinn; Mitchell P Rosen; Isabel Elaine Allen; Heather G Huddleston; Marcelle I Cedars; Victor Y Fujimoto
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Health of Infants After ART-Treated, Subfertile, and Fertile Deliveries.

Authors:  Sunah S Hwang; Dmitry Dukhovny; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Stacey Missmer; Hafsatou Diop; Eugene Declercq; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Visual function in infants with antenatal Zika virus exposure.

Authors:  Andrea A Zin; Irena Tsui; Julia D Rossetto; Stephanie L Gaw; Luiza M Neves; Olivia A Zin; Lorena Haefeli; Joel Carlos Barros Silveira Filho; Kristina Adachi; Marcos Vinicius da Silva Pone; Sheila Moura Pone; Natalia Molleri; Jose Paulo Pereira; Rubens Belfort; Vaithilingaraja Arumugaswami; Zilton Vasconcelos; Patricia Brasil; Karin Nielsen-Saines; Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Sex-specific epigenetic profile of inner cell mass of mice conceived in vivo or by IVF.

Authors:  Elena Ruggeri; Saúl Lira-Albarrán; Edward J Grow; Xiaowei Liu; Royce Harner; Emin Maltepe; Miguel Ramalho-Santos; Annemarie Donjacour; Paolo Rinaudo
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Maternal Vascular Health in Pregnancy and Postpartum After Assisted Reproduction.

Authors:  Frauke von Versen-Höynck; Sebastian Häckl; Elif Seda Selamet Tierney; Kirk P Conrad; Valerie L Baker; Virginia D Winn
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  The value of transvaginal 4-dimensional hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in predicting the necessity of assisted reproductive technology for women with tubal factor infertility.

Authors:  Pan Gu; Xuan Yang; Xingping Zhao; Dabao Xu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.