Literature DB >> 31515048

Outcome of Partial Pulpotomy in Cariously Exposed Posterior Permanent Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Firas Elmsmari1, Xavier-Fructuós Ruiz1, Queralt Miró2, Nancy Feijoo-Pato1, Fernando Durán-Sindreu1, Juan Gonzalo Olivieri3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the success rate of partial pulpotomy in treating permanent posterior teeth with carious vital pulp exposure. A secondary aim was to assess the prognostic factors using a meta-regression.
METHODS: An electronic search was performed for studies from January 1950 to November 2018 in the following databases: PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane. All searches were performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Clinical studies evaluating the success rate of cariously exposed vital human permanent posterior teeth treated with a partial pulpotomy were selected. Only randomized clinical trials and prospective clinical studies were included for evaluation. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Cochrane Collaboration's tool were used to evaluate risk assessment.
RESULTS: From the 218 studies identified through the initial search, 11 studies qualified for the final analysis (5 randomized clinical trials and 6 prospective studies). The results of the meta-analysis indicate a success rate of 98% (confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1), 96% (CI: 0.92-0.99), and 92% (CI: 0.83-0.97) after 6 months and 1 and 2 years of follow-up. Examining the probable prognostic factors using meta-regression analysis, only preoperative pulp status (P = .001) was identified as a significant factor, with studies including teeth with the presumptive diagnosis of irreversible pulpitis displaying significantly lower results. The final solution, pulp capping material, apex closure, and the age of the patient did not affect the treatment success rate (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: The available data suggest that a partial pulpotomy results in high success rates in treating cariously exposed permanent posterior teeth up to 2 years. Six months of monitoring can be considered an appropriate period when evaluating the success of a partial pulpotomy although more clinical and radiographic controls are essential to ensuring success.
Copyright © 2019 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dental caries; dental pulp exposure; evidence-based dentistry; pulpitis; pulpotomy; vital pulp

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31515048     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  10 in total

Review 1.  Is pulpotomy a promising modality in treating permanent teeth? An umbrella review.

Authors:  Galvin Sim Siang Lin; Yun Qing Yew; Hern Yue Lee; Ting Low; Manushantini Pillai Muralitharan Pillai; Thittikkon Suvanpratum Laer; Sharifah Wade'ah Wafa Syed Saadun Tarek Wafa
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.634

2.  Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma and Platelet Rich Fibrin for Direct Pulp Capping in Adult Patients with Carious Pulp Exposure- A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shekar Shobana; Mahendran Kavitha; Narasimhan Srinivasan
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2022-06

Review 3.  Vital pulp therapy in carious pulp-exposed permanent teeth: an umbrella review.

Authors:  Dephne Jack Xin Leong; Adrian Ujin Yap
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Endodontic regeneration: hard shell, soft core.

Authors:  Matthias Widbiller; Gottfried Schmalz
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Performance of a Biodegradable Composite with Hydroxyapatite as a Scaffold in Pulp Tissue Repair.

Authors:  Motoki Okamoto; Sayako Matsumoto; Ayato Sugiyama; Kei Kanie; Masakatsu Watanabe; Hailing Huang; Manahil Ali; Yuki Ito; Jiro Miura; Yujiro Hirose; Koichiro Uto; Mitsuhiro Ebara; Ryuji Kato; Aika Yamawaki-Ogata; Yuji Narita; Shigetada Kawabata; Yusuke Takahashi; Mikako Hayashi
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 6.  Pulpotomy for treatment of complicated crown fractures in permanent teeth: A systematic review.

Authors:  Aisling Donnelly; Federico Foschi; Paul McCabe; Henry F Duncan
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.165

Review 7.  The Understanding of Vital Pulp Therapy in Permanent Teeth: A New Perspective.

Authors:  Wei Shang; Zeliang Zhang; Xicong Zhao; Qingquan Dong; Gerhard Schmalz; Shaonan Hu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 8.  Outcomes reporting in systematic reviews on vital pulp treatment: A scoping review for the development of a core outcome set.

Authors:  Siobhan Cushley; Henry F Duncan; Fionnuala T Lundy; Venkateshbabu Nagendrababu; Mike Clarke; Ikhlas El Karim
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.165

9.  Nanoparticles of Bioactive Glass Enhance Biodentine Bioactivity on Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Authors:  Camila Corral Nunez; Diego Altamirano Gaete; Miguel Maureira; Javier Martin; Cristian Covarrubias
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.623

10.  Partial pulpotomy without age restriction: a retrospective assessment of permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure.

Authors:  Florin Eggmann; Thomas J W Gasser; Hanjo Hecker; Mauro Amato; Roland Weiger; Lucia K Zaugg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 3.573

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.