| Literature DB >> 35786576 |
Shekar Shobana1, Mahendran Kavitha2, Narasimhan Srinivasan3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the effectiveness of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) and Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) as direct pulp capping materials in patients with carious pulp exposure using cone beam computed tomography.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35786576 PMCID: PMC9285992 DOI: 10.14744/eej.2021.04834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Endod J ISSN: 2548-0839
Figure 1Consort flow diagram
Figure 2Measurement and marking of the formed dentine bridge in MTA group for volumetric analysis. (a-c) Localisation of three focus points below the exposure site for volumetric analysis. (d) Dentine bridge below the exposure site marked for image segmentation and 3D image generation
MTA: SMineral trioxide aggregate
Figure 5Three-dimensional reconstructed image of the dentine bridge
MTA: Mineral trioxide aggregate, PRP: Platelet rich plasma, PRF: Platelet rich fibrin
Pulp sensibility test results at 12 months
| S. no | Cold test | Electric pulp test | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases treated (Number of cases with positive response) | Number of cases treated (Number of cases with positive response) | |||||
| MTA | PRP | PRF | MTA | PRP | PRF | |
| 10 (9) | 10 (9) | 10 (9) | 10 (9) | 10 (9) | 10 (9) | |
| % of cases with positive response at 12 months | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 | 90 |
MTA: Mineral trioxide aggregate, PRP: Platelet rich plasma, PRF: Platelet rich fibrin
Volume of dentine bridge formation in the three groups – Kruskal Wallis test
| Group (n=10) | Mean (mm3) | Standard deviation | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTA | 0.0720 | 0.0181 | <0.001 |
| PRP | 0.1392 | 0.0161 | |
| PRF | 0.1368 | 0.0128 |
MTA: Mineral trioxide aggregate, PRP: Platelet rich plasma, PRF: Platelet rich fibrin
Pairwise comparison between MTA, PRP and PRF
| Group | Test statistic | Standard error | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTA vs PRF | -14.850 | 3.855 | <0.001* |
| MTA vs PRP | -15.150 | 3.855 | <0.001* |
| PRP vs PRF | 0.300 | 3.855 | 0.938 |
Denotes statistical significance. mm3: volume of dentine bridge in cubic millimetres, MTA: Mineral trioxide aggregate, PRP: Platelet rich plasma, PRF: Platelet rich fibrin