Literature DB >> 31513945

Cardiac resynchronization therapy by left bundle branch area pacing in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block.

Weiwei Zhang1, Jingjuan Huang1, Yiding Qi1, Fei Wang1, Lina Guo2, Xuerui Shi1, Weihua Wu2, Xiaohong Zhou3, Ruogu Li4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing has demonstrated clinical benefits in patients with heart failure (HF) and ventricular dyssynchrony. Other approaches of CRT is little known.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with HF and left bundle branch block (LBBB).
METHODS: Eleven consecutive patients with HF, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and LBBB and indicated for CRT were recruited. LBBAP was achieved via transventricular septal approach and characterized by narrower QRS duration, shortened peak left ventricular activation time, and right bundle branch conduction delay on the electrocardiogram. Electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and cardiac function were evaluated at baseline and follow-up. Interventricular mechanical delay and 3-dimensional tissue synchronization imaging during LBBAP and intrinsic LBBB status were measured by echocardiography at follow-up.
RESULTS: LBBAP significantly shortened QRS duration (from baseline 180.00 ± 15.86 ms to 129.09 ± 15.94 ms; P < .01) and left ventricular activation time (from baseline 108.18 ± 15.54 ms to 80.91 ± 9.95 ms; P < .01). Interventricular mechanical delay and the standard deviation of tissue synchronization imaging of 12 left ventricular (LV) segments were significantly shorter during LBBAP than in intrinsic LBBB status (both with P < .01). At a mean follow-up period of 6.7 months, New York Heart Association functional class, plasma level of B-type natriuretic peptide, LV end-systolic diameter, and left ventricular ejection fraction were significantly improved (all with P < .05 vs baseline).
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that LBBAP is clinically feasible in patients with systolic HF and LBBB. LBBAP can be a new CRT technique to correct LBBB, provide ventricular synchrony, and improve clinical symptoms with LV reverse remodeling.
Copyright © 2019 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Heart failure; Left bundle branch area pacing; Left bundle branch block; Ventricular synchrony

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31513945     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  38 in total

Review 1.  Physiologic Pacing Targeting the His Bundle and Left Bundle Branch: a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Seth D Scheetz; Gaurav A Upadhyay
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 3.955

2.  Recovery of complete left bundle branch block in a dilated cardiomyopathy patient after treatment with sacubitril/valsartan: A case report.

Authors:  Meng-Ling Peng; Yu Fu; Ying Zhang; Chu-Wen Wu; Hang Ren; Shan-Shan Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Risk factors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy-Insights from lead position.

Authors:  Tomotaka Yoshiyama; Kenji Shimeno; Yusuke Hayashi; Asahiro Ito; Shinichi Iwata; Yoshiki Matsumura; Yasuhiro Izumiya; Yukio Abe; Shoichi Ehara; Takahiko Naruko
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2022-04-07

Review 4.  Discussion of LBBP synchronization effects in HF patients with LBBB and comparison with BiV-CRT.

Authors:  Shigeng Zhang; Qijun Shan
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Left bundle branch pacing in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy-a novel approach.

Authors:  Soumya Patra; Ashesh Halder; Rabin Chakraborty; Arindam Pande; Dilip Kumar; Somnath Dey; Sanjeev S Mukherjee; Rana Rathor Roy
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  The Mechanical Cost of Decreasing Conduction Velocity: A Mathematical Model of Pacing-Induced Lower Strain.

Authors:  Ibrahim Marai; David Carasso; Shaqed Carasso; Shemy Carasso
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-06-30

Review 7.  Innovations in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Khurrum Khan; Jitae A Kim; Andra Gurgu; Muzamil Khawaja; Dragos Cozma; Mihail G Chelu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 3.947

8.  A single-centre prospective evaluation of left bundle branch area pacemaker implantation characteristics.

Authors:  L I B Heckman; J G L M Luermans; M Jastrzębski; B Weijs; A M W Van Stipdonk; S Westra; D den Uijl; D Linz; M Mafi-Rad; F W Prinzen; K Vernooy
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.854

9.  Safety and efficacy of left bundle branch pacing in comparison with conventional right ventricular pacing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Wenbin Li; Lei Wang; Shaohua Tian; Xiaolin Zhou; Mingxing Wu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  The electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters of permanent left bundle branch pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jia Gao; Bing-Hang Zhang; Nan Zhang; Meng Sun; Rui Wang
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.