Literature DB >> 31512514

HGF/MET pathway aberrations as diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in human cancers.

Fatemeh Moosavi1, Elisa Giovannetti2,3, Luciano Saso4, Omidreza Firuzi1.   

Abstract

Cancer is a major cause of death worldwide. MET tyrosine kinase receptor [MET, c-MET, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor] pathway activation is associated with the appearance of several hallmarks of cancer. The HGF/MET pathway has emerged as an important actionable target across many solid tumors; therefore, biomarker discovery becomes essential in order to guide clinical intervention and patient stratification with the aim of moving towards personalized medicine. The focus of this review is on how the aberrant activation of the HGF/MET pathway in tumor tissue or the circulation can provide diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers and predictive biomarkers of drug response. Many meta-analyses have shown that aberrant activation of the MET pathway in tumor tissue, including MET gene overexpression, gene amplification, exon 14 skipping and other activating mutations, is almost invariably associated with shorter survival and poor prognosis. Most meta-analyses have been performed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast, head and neck cancers as well as colorectal, gastric, pancreatic and other gastrointestinal cancers. Furthermore, several studies have shown the predictive value of MET biomarkers in the identification of patients who gain the most benefit from HGF/MET targeted therapies administered as single or combination therapies. The highest predictive values have been observed for response to foretinib and savolitinib in renal cancer, as well as tivantinib in NSCLC and colorectal cancer. However, some studies, especially those based on MET expression, have failed to show much value in these stratifications. This may be rooted in lack of standardization of methodologies, in particular in scoring systems applied in immunohistochemistry determinations or absence of oncogenic addiction of cancer cells to the MET pathway, despite detection of overexpression. Measurements of amplification and mutation aberrations are less likely to suffer from these pitfalls. Increased levels of MET soluble ectodomain (sMET) in circulation have also been associated with poor prognosis; however, the evidence is not as strong as it is with tissue-based biomarkers. As a diagnostic biomarker, sMET has shown its value in distinguishing cancer patients from healthy individuals in prostate and bladder cancers and in melanoma. On the other hand, increased circulating HGF has also been presented as a valuable prognostic and diagnostic biomarker in many cancers; however, there is controversy on the predictive value of HGF as a biomarker. Other biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and tumor HGF levels have also been briefly covered. In conclusion, HGF/MET aberrations can provide valuable diagnostic, prognostic and predictive biomarkers and represent vital assets for personalized cancer therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Receptor tyrosine kinases; biomarker discovery; c-MET; neoplasms; targeted therapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 31512514     DOI: 10.1080/10408363.2019.1653821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci        ISSN: 1040-8363            Impact factor:   6.250


  46 in total

1.  MiR-22-3p suppresses cell growth via MET/STAT3 signaling in lung cancer.

Authors:  Xia Yang; Wenmei Su; Yu Li; Zhiqing Zhou; Yi Zhou; Hu Shan; Xiaoling Han; Ming Zhang; Qiuhong Zhang; Ying Bai; Chunfang Guo; Shuanying Yang; David G Beer; Guoan Chen
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  Cabozantinib with or without Panitumumab for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: impact of MET amplification on clinical outcomes and circulating biomarkers.

Authors:  Jingquan Jia; Lauren Howard; Yingmiao Liu; Mark D Starr; John C Brady; Donna Niedzwiecki; John H Strickler; Andrew B Nixon
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 3.  Increasing cancer permeability by photodynamic priming: from microenvironment to mechanotransduction signaling.

Authors:  Nazareth Milagros Carigga Gutierrez; Núria Pujol-Solé; Qendresa Arifi; Jean-Luc Coll; Tristan le Clainche; Mans Broekgaarden
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 9.237

4.  MET Expression Level in Lung Adenocarcinoma Loosely Correlates with MET Copy Number Gain/Amplification and Is a Poor Predictor of Patient Outcome.

Authors:  Wei Yin; Ming Guo; Zhenya Tang; Gokce A Toruner; Joanne Cheng; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Guilin Tang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Phase I Study of Glesatinib (MGCD265) in Combination with Erlotinib or Docetaxel in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Amita Patnaik; Shirish Gadgeel; Kyriakos P Papadopoulos; Drew W Rasco; Naomi B Haas; Hirak Der-Torossian; Demiana Faltaos; Diane Potvin; Vanessa Tassell; Manal Tawashi; Richard Chao; Peter J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 4.864

Review 6.  Long non-coding RNAs in endometrial physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Fatimah Aljubran; Warren B Nothnick
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.102

7.  Phase 1b/2 trial of tepotinib in sorafenib pretreated advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with MET overexpression.

Authors:  Thomas Decaens; Carlo Barone; Eric Assenat; Martin Wermke; Angelica Fasolo; Philippe Merle; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Véronique Grando; Angelo Iacobellis; Erica Villa; Joerg Trojan; Josef Straub; Rolf Bruns; Karin Berghoff; Juergen Scheele; Eric Raymond; Sandrine Faivre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Comprehensive Analysis of the Expression and Prognostic Value of SPINT1/2 in Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Qiulin Wu; Guobing Yin; Jing Luo; Yingzi Zhang; Tiantian Ai; Jiao Tian; Yudi Jin; Jinwei Lei; Shengchun Liu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 5.555

9.  Phase 1 study of safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of tivantinib in combination with bevacizumab in adult patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  William F Maguire; John C Schmitz; Jonas Scemama; Ken Czambel; Yan Lin; Anthony G Green; Shaoyu Wu; Huang Lin; Shannon Puhalla; John Rhee; Ronald Stoller; Hussein Tawbi; James J Lee; John J Wright; Jan H Beumer; Edward Chu; Leonard J Appleman
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Efficacy of Savolitinib vs Sunitinib in Patients With MET-Driven Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: The SAVOIR Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Toni K Choueiri; Daniel Y C Heng; Jae Lyun Lee; Mathilde Cancel; Remy B Verheijen; Anders Mellemgaard; Lone H Ottesen; Melanie M Frigault; Anne L'Hernault; Zsolt Szijgyarto; Sabina Signoretti; Laurence Albiges
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.