| Literature DB >> 31509969 |
Jeahee Ryu1, Soyoun Kim2, Jaeseung Song3, Daeun Kim4, Narae Keum5, Wonhee Jang6, Hyosang Bae7, Youngeun Kwon8.
Abstract
Food intolerance is delayed adverse food reactions which follow consumption of specific foods. The underlying mechanisms are not well understood, but food intolerance is often considered as a type 2 hypersensitivity reaction mediated by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody. To understand the causes of food intolerance, it is important to investigate sensitization patterns of food-specific IgGs (sIgG) in relation to dietary patterns and physical conditions. Conventional approaches to measure serological IgGs often require large volumes of serum, thus are not suitable for highly multiplexed assays. To overcome this impracticality, we developed a highly sensitive method to screen the sIgGs and other antibody isotypes against 66 antigens with minimal amount of serums. We prepared a microarray by immobilizing food antigens on activated glass slides. Human sera and their dietary information were obtained from 30 subjects. Aliquots (200 nl) of sera were analyzed against 66 food antigens in parallel. sIgG levels were determined and analyzed in relation to subjects' dietary patterns. The levels of antibody isotypes were also examined to understand the relationship between allergy and food intolerance. The developed microarray showed exceptional performances in antibody screening and demonstrated the potential to be used as an automated assay system.Entities:
Keywords: IgE; IgG; antibody isotypes; dietary pattern; food intolerance; protein microarray
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31509969 PMCID: PMC6766807 DOI: 10.3390/s19183893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Fabrication of model microarray and performance evaluation (A) A model microarray presenting ovalbumin, casein, and gluten was prepared and used to screen specific antibodies, anti-ovalbumin antibody, anti-casein antibody, or anti-gluten antibody, individually. (B) The fluorescence intensity showed a linear concentration dependence for anti-CAS antibody. (C) The fluorescence intensity showed a linear concentration dependence for anti-OVA and anti-GLU antibody. (D) Human IgGs were quantitatively analyzed using the model microarray, presenting protein L in different concentrations. (E) Multiple target detection by the model microarray using different combinations of sIgGs. ** indicates p < 0.01 and *** indicates p < 0.001 using two-way ANOVA analysis. OVA: ovalbumin, CAS: casein, GLU: gluten, hIgG: human immunoglobulin G, sIgG: specific immunoglobin G.
Food antigens presented on the microarray.
| Categories | Food Antigens |
|---|---|
|
| Mung Beans, Buckwheat, Barley, Rice, Rice bran, Corn, Adlay extract, Sesame, Glutinous rice |
|
| White potato, Sweet potato, Chili pepper, Carrot, Peanut *, Yam, Mushroom, Lettuce, Spinach, Mugwort*, Cabbage, Onion, Cucumber, Tomato, Summer squash, |
|
| Crab*, Big mackerel*, Oyster, Seaweed, Codfish, Anchovy, Whiting, Shrimp *, Salmon, Eel, Abalone, Clam, Tuna |
|
| Mandarin orange, Strawberry, Banana, Chestnut, Pear, Peach, Apple, Watermelon, Pine nut, Pineapple, Grape, white, Walnut |
|
| Whole egg, Cow milk *, Cheddar cheese, Chicken, Pork, Beef, Duck |
|
| Gluten, Green tea, Garlic, Honey, Ginger, Arrow root, Curry, Cacao, Coffee, Black tea |
* These antigens are previously analyzed on microarray for serological IgE detection [18].
Figure 2Fabrication of food microarray and performance evaluation (A) Two serum samples obtained from two different human subjects showed discrete sensitization patterns. (B) The same serum sample was analyzed using two replicate arrays, assay #1 and #2, to test the reproducibility of the microarray-based assays. The two independent assays showed an excellent correlation with Pearson’s r of 0.99. (C) Whole blood and serum obtained from the same human subject showed similar sensitization pattern. (D) The whole blood and the serum samples obtained from the same subject were analyzed individually. The whole blood sample showed decreased signal intensity, but both assays showed an excellent correlation with Pearson’s r of 0.96.
Intra- and inter-assay variability determined using the developed microarray platform for selected food antigens.
| Antigen | Milk (Cow) | Egg Whole | Chili Pepper | Rice | Gluten | Garlic | Pork | Cacao |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-assay Variability (%) | 6.7 | 6.6 | 10.3 | 17.1 | 9.9 | 11.6 | 16.0 | 14.6 |
| Inter-assay Variability (%) | 2.5 | 1.2 | 9.2 | 10.5 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 4.1 |
Figure 3Analysis of serological IgG levels in comparison to dietary patterns of subjects (A) Correlation between the average consumption frequency per month and sIgG values. Foods on the x-axis were aligned in descending order of consumption, and sIgG values on the y-axis were transformed to log10 IgG values. (B) Correlation between consumption frequencies and IgG values in selected groups. Selected foods belonging to three distinctive food groups, namely low tolerance, spicy, and allergenic foods, were presented. (C) Comparison of foods with the same origin. Statistical analyses were conducted with two-tailed Wilcox test. *** indicates p < 0.001. IgG: immunoglobulin G, sIgG: specific immunoglobin G.
Figure 4Correlation of serological immunoglobulin isotypes in allergic patient and control subject. Upper panel (A–C) represents the data obtained from allergic patient. (A) Correlation between IgG and IgE. (B) Correlation between IgG and IgG4. (C) Correlation between IgE and IgG4. Lower panel (D–F) indicates the data obtained from non-allergic control subject. (D) Correlation between IgG and IgE. (E) Correlation between IgG and IgG4. (F) Correlation between IgE and IgG4. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were shown inside the graphs. Ig: immunoglobulin.