Miriam R Rafferty1, Jillian MacDonald2, Alexandria Byskosh3, Laura Sloan4, Santiago Toledo5, Christina Marciniak6, Tanya Simuni7. 1. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab Illinois; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 355 E Erie St, 19th Floor Strength and Endurance Lab, Chicago, IL 60611 (USA); and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University. 2. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. Dr MacDonald is a board-certified clinical specialist in neurologic physical therapy. 3. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University. 4. DPT Shirley Ryan AbilityLab. 5. Shirley Ryan AbilityLab; and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University. 6. AbilityLab; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University; and Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University. 7. Department of Neurology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: European clinical practice guidelines recommend physical therapy for people with Parkinson disease (PD) soon after diagnosis to provide education, physical activity advice, and individualized interventions when needed. However, therapy is frequently not used until after gait and balance problems occur. The purpose of this administrative case study is to present the application of a proactive physical therapy (PAPT) approach at 1 rehabilitation center using implementation frameworks to support the (1) implementation process, (2) determinants of implementation success, and (3) implementation evaluation. CASE DESCRIPTION: The PAPT program targeted people with PD before the onset of significant mobility dysfunction. It was initiated in 1 outpatient neurological rehabilitation center. The program used shared decision-making to promote long-term maintenance of independent exercise. The Knowledge-to-Action Framework was used by champions to plan implementation processes. Implementation barriers were addressed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The program was evaluated using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework with mixed methods. OUTCOMES: In the program's first year, 38 people were referred, 28 were evaluated, and 20 participated in the 6-month program evaluation. Following PAPT, the number of participants reporting regular participation in aerobic, strengthening, and flexibility exercise approximately doubled, while those engaging in balance activities increased from 1 to 8. They reported a median of 140 minutes of aerobic exercise per week. Implementation barriers included location, insurance coverage, and difficulty scheduling long-term follow-up visits. Participants reported physical and emotional benefits of the program. DISCUSSION: Implementation frameworks assisted with the implementation and evaluation of a PAPT delivery model that helped people with PD to increase and maintain independent exercise participation.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: European clinical practice guidelines recommend physical therapy for people with Parkinson disease (PD) soon after diagnosis to provide education, physical activity advice, and individualized interventions when needed. However, therapy is frequently not used until after gait and balance problems occur. The purpose of this administrative case study is to present the application of a proactive physical therapy (PAPT) approach at 1 rehabilitation center using implementation frameworks to support the (1) implementation process, (2) determinants of implementation success, and (3) implementation evaluation. CASE DESCRIPTION: The PAPT program targeted people with PD before the onset of significant mobility dysfunction. It was initiated in 1 outpatient neurological rehabilitation center. The program used shared decision-making to promote long-term maintenance of independent exercise. The Knowledge-to-Action Framework was used by champions to plan implementation processes. Implementation barriers were addressed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The program was evaluated using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework with mixed methods. OUTCOMES: In the program's first year, 38 people were referred, 28 were evaluated, and 20 participated in the 6-month program evaluation. Following PAPT, the number of participants reporting regular participation in aerobic, strengthening, and flexibility exercise approximately doubled, while those engaging in balance activities increased from 1 to 8. They reported a median of 140 minutes of aerobic exercise per week. Implementation barriers included location, insurance coverage, and difficulty scheduling long-term follow-up visits. Participants reported physical and emotional benefits of the program. DISCUSSION: Implementation frameworks assisted with the implementation and evaluation of a PAPT delivery model that helped people with PD to increase and maintain independent exercise participation.
Authors: James T Cavanaugh; Terry D Ellis; Gammon M Earhart; Matthew P Ford; K Bo Foreman; Leland E Dibble Journal: J Neurol Phys Ther Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Carl E Clarke; Smitaa Patel; Natalie Ives; Caroline E Rick; Francis Dowling; Rebecca Woolley; Keith Wheatley; Marion F Walker; Catherine M Sackley Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Marlies van Nimwegen; Arlène D Speelman; Katrijn Smulders; Sebastiaan Overeem; George F Borm; Frank J G Backx; Bastiaan R Bloem; Marten Munneke Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2010-08-19 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Rebekah L S Summers; Miriam R Rafferty; Michael J Howell; Colum D MacKinnon Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2021-05-12 Impact factor: 3.919