| Literature DB >> 31508720 |
Ricardo H Aoki1, Italla Maria Pinheiro Bezerra1,2,3, Alvaro Dantas de Almeida-Júnior1, Renata Thaís de A Barbosa1, Vitor E Valenti4, Fernando R Oliveira5, Adriano L Roque6, Hugo Macedo Ferraz E Souza Júnior1, David M Garner7, Rodrigo D Raimundo1, Luiz Carlos de Abreu1,2,3,8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the effects of cataract surgery on cardiac autonomic modulation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31508720 PMCID: PMC6724456 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2019/e809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Figure 1Experimental protocol.
Comorbidities presented by the included patients.
| Disease | Number |
|---|---|
| Obesity | 5 (2 men) |
| Lumbar hernia | 2 (1 man) |
| Obesity and lumbar hernia | 12 (6 men) |
Mean values, followed by their respective standard deviations of the body mass index (BMI), height, mass and age.
| Variables | Men | Women |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 70.2±3.1 | 73.4±4.1 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 69.5±2.82 | 69±4.7 |
| Caucasian | 6 | 8 |
| Black | 2 | 3 |
BMI=body mass index; kg=kilogram; m=meter.
Correlation between age and BMI with resting HRV.
| RMSSD | r | |
| Age | 0.004 | 0.98 |
| BMI | 0.01 | 0.69 |
| SDNN | r | |
| Age | 0.07 | 0.27 |
| BMI | 0.001 | 0.86 |
| pNN50 | r | |
| Age | 0.22 | 0.06 |
| BMI | 0.002 | 0.94 |
| RRtri | r | |
| Age | 0.07 | 0.27 |
| BMI | 0.01 | 0.59 |
| TINN | r | |
| Age | 0.17 | 0.07 |
| BMI | 0.01 | 0.66 |
| SD1 | r | |
| Age | 0.15 | 0.1 |
| BMI | 0.01 | 0.69 |
| SD2 | r | |
| Age | 0.06 | 0.3 |
| BMI | 0.003 | 0.81 |
| LF | r | |
| Age | 0.05 | 0.34 |
| BMI | 0.03 | 0.45 |
| HF | r | |
| Age | 0.05 | 0.34 |
| BMI | 0.03 | 0.45 |
| LF/HF | r | |
| Age | 0.006 | 0.97 |
| BMI | 0.02 | 0.56 |
Legend: pNN50: the percentage of adjacent RR intervals with a difference of duration greater than 50 ms; RMSSD: root-mean square of differences between adjacent normal RR intervals in a time interval; ms: milliseconds; SDNN: average standard deviation of normal RR intervals; SD1: standard deviation of the instantaneous variability of the beat-to beat HR; SD2: standard deviation of long-term continuous RR interval variability; TINN: triangular interpolation of RR interval histogram; RRtri: triangular index; LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; LF/HF: low frequency/high frequency ratio; BMI: body mass index.
Figure 2Time domain analysis of HRV before (pre), during surgery (surgery) and after surgery (post). pNN50: the percentage of adjacent RR intervals with a difference of duration greater than 50 ms; RMSSD: root-mean square of differences between adjacent normal RR intervals in a time interval; ms: milliseconds; SDNN: average standard deviation of normal RR intervals; HR: heart rate; ms: milliseconds.
Figure 3Geometric analysis of HRV before (pre), during surgery (surgery) and after surgery (post). SD1: standard deviation of the instantaneous variability of the beat-to beat HR; SD2: standard deviation of long-term continuous RR interval variability; TINN: triangular interpolation of the RR interval histogram; RRtri: triangular index. ms: milliseconds.
Figure 4Frequency domain analysis of HRV before (pre), during surgery (surgery) and after surgery (post). LF: low frequency; HF: high frequency; LF/HF: low frequency/high frequency ratio; nu: normalized units. *p=0.02; Pre vs Surgery.