Literature DB >> 31507280

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Teaching and Learning Technology in a Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Mark Harrison1,2, Joshua Quisias1, Emma J Frew3, Simon P Albon1.   

Abstract

Objective. To conduct a cost-benefit analysis (CBA) of investment in teaching and learning technology (TLT) by a college of pharmacy in a large, research-intensive university in Canada. Methods. Document analysis was used to determine the goals and objectives of the university and college for TLT use. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with faculty members to understand their perspectives on the value of technology for teaching and learning, their metrics to assess value, and an estimate of social value using a willingness to pay (WTP) exercise. A CBA was used to compare the social value against the cost of the investment in TLT. Results. Twenty-one faculty members participated in semi-structured interviews. National, university, and college goals for TLT were diffuse and nonspecific in terms of the intended use or the metrics by which implementation and impacts on the quality of teaching could be assessed. The mean WTP for this technology was Can$4.38M and the cost of investment was Can$4.25M. The primary analysis showed a small positive net benefit of the investment (Can$134,456), although this difference was not significant. All dollar figures are given in Canadian dollars (CAD). Conclusion. The college's monetary investment in TLT was approximately equal to the social value placed on TLT by faculty users. Conducting a CBA on technology can bring greater understanding among faculty members of the college's curriculum and pedagogical practices as well as financial decision-making. Greater clarity about the goals and objectives for TLT could help to maximize the value of investment in this area.

Keywords:  cost-benefit analysis; curriculum decision-making; educational technology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31507280      PMCID: PMC6718486          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe6834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  14 in total

Review 1.  Curricular change in medical schools: how to succeed.

Authors:  C J Bland; S Starnaman; L Wersal; L Moorehead-Rosenberg; S Zonia; R Henry
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.893

2.  Evidence of range bias in contingent valuation payment scales.

Authors:  David K Whynes; Jane L Wolstenholme; Emma Frew
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Cost-benefit analysis in health care expenditure decision-making.

Authors:  J Hutton
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Comparing willingness-to-pay: bidding game format versus open-ended and payment scale formats.

Authors:  Emma J Frew; Jane L Wolstenholme; David K Whynes
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 5.  Web 2.0 and pharmacy education.

Authors:  Jeff Cain; Brent I Fox
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 6.  Roles of innovation in education delivery.

Authors:  Robert A Blouin; William H Riffee; Evan T Robinson; Diane E Beck; Charles Green; Pamela U Joyner; Adam M Persky; Gary M Pollack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  In reply to Spangler.

Authors:  Jacqueline E McLaughlin; Mary T Roth; Russell J Mumper
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  An economic analysis of patient simulators clinical training in nursing education.

Authors:  Kirk C Harlow; Susan Sportsman
Journal:  Nurs Econ       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.085

Review 9.  Cost considerations in using simulations for medical training.

Authors:  J D Fletcher; Alexander P Wind
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Blended Versus Face-to-Face Delivery of Evidence-Based Medicine to Medical Students.

Authors:  Stephen Maloney; Peter Nicklen; George Rivers; Jonathan Foo; Ying Ying Ooi; Scott Reeves; Kieran Walsh; Dragan Ilic
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.