Literature DB >> 31505650

The impact of dietary supplementation of arginine during gestation in a commercial swine herd: II. Offspring performance.

Elizabeth A Hines1, Matthew R Romoser1, Zoë E Kiefer1, Aileen F Keating1, Lance H Baumgard1, Jarad Niemi2, Benjamin Haberl3, Noel H Williams3, Brian J Kerr4, Kevin J Touchette5, Jason W Ross1.   

Abstract

Arginine (Arg) is an important amino acid of pig fetal development; however, whether Arg improves postnatal performance is ill-defined. Therefore, the influence of Arg supplementation at different gestational stages on offspring performance was evaluated in a commercial swine herd. Sows (n = 548) were allocated into 4, diet by stage of gestation treatments: Control (n = 143; 0% suppl. Arg), or dietary treatments supplemented with 1% L-Arg (free-base; Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition North America, Inc., Chicago, IL): from 15 to 45 d of gestation (n = 138; Early-Arg); 15 d of gestation to farrowing (n = 139; Full-Arg); and from day 85 of gestation to farrowing (n = 128; Late-Arg). All offspring were individually identified and weighed at birth; at weaning, a subset was selected for evaluation of carcass performance at market. All data were analyzed using birth weight (BiWt) and age as covariates. Wean weights (WW) and prewean (PW) ADG tended to increase (P = 0.06) in progeny from sows supplemented with Arg, as compared to progeny from Control sows. Preplanned contrast comparisons revealed an increased (P = 0.03) BiWt for pigs from sows receiving 1% L-Arg prior to day 45 of gestation (Early-Arg and Full-Arg; 1.38 kg/pig), as compared to pigs from sows not supplemented prior to day 45 of gestation (Control and Late-Arg; 1.34 kg/pig). No difference in BiWt was observed (1.36 kg/pig; P = 0.68) for Arg supplementation after day 85 of gestation (Full-Arg and Late-Arg), as compared to those not receiving Arg supplementation after day 85 (Control and Early-Arg); although WW and PW ADG were greater (P = 0.02), respectively. A 3.6% decrease (P = 0.05) in peak lean accretion ADG occurred when dams received 1% L-Arg prior to day 45 of gestation (Early-Arg and Full-Arg), however, no other significant differences were detected in finishing growth parameters or carcass characteristics (P ≥ 0.1). Pig mortality rates tended (P = 0.07) to decrease in progeny of dams supplemented Arg after day 85 (3.6%) compared to dams not provided additional Arg during late gestation (4.9%). Collectively, these data suggest that Arg provided during late gestation may improve WW and PW ADG, however, finishing performance was not affected. While Arg supplementation provided some moderate production benefits, further investigation is warranted to comprehensively understand the gestational timing and biological role of Arg supplementation during fetal and postnatal development in commercial production systems.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  arginine; fetal programming; growth; mortality; pig; swine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31505650      PMCID: PMC6735700          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz214

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  26 in total

Review 1.  Maternal nutrition and fetal development.

Authors:  Guoyao Wu; Fuller W Bazer; Timothy A Cudd; Cynthia J Meininger; Thomas E Spencer
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.798

Review 2.  Developmental programming of the metabolic syndrome by maternal nutritional imbalance: how strong is the evidence from experimental models in mammals?

Authors:  James A Armitage; Imran Y Khan; Paul D Taylor; Peter W Nathanielsz; Lucilla Poston
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Limited and excess dietary protein during gestation affects growth and compositional traits in gilts and impairs offspring fetal growth.

Authors:  C Rehfeldt; I S Lang; S Görs; U Hennig; C Kalbe; B Stabenow; K-P Brüssow; R Pfuhl; O Bellmann; G Nürnberg; W Otten; C C Metges
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  Fetoplacental transport and utilization of amino acids in IUGR--a review.

Authors:  T R H Regnault; J E Friedman; R B Wilkening; R V Anthony; W W Hay
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 5.  Aetiology and pathogenesis of IUGR.

Authors:  Srividhya Sankaran; Phillipa M Kyle
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2009-08-08       Impact factor: 5.237

6.  Effects of L-carnitine on fetal growth and the IGF system in pigs.

Authors:  A T Waylan; J P Kayser; D P Gnad; J J Higgins; J D Starkey; E K Sissom; J C Woodworth; B J Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork.

Authors:  A D Beaulieu; J L Aalhus; N H Williams; J F Patience
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 8.  The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs.

Authors:  G R Foxcroft; W T Dixon; S Novak; C T Putman; S C Town; M D A Vinsky
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 9.  Arginine nutrition in neonatal pigs.

Authors:  Guoyao Wu; Darrell A Knabe; Sung Woo Kim
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Impaired insulin secretion after prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine.

Authors:  Susanne R de Rooij; Rebecca C Painter; David I W Phillips; Clive Osmond; Robert P J Michels; Ian F Godsland; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Otto P Bleker; Tessa J Roseboom
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.