BACKGROUND: Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a newly discovered type of endogenous noncoding RNA, have been proposed to mediate the progression of diverse types of tumors. Systematic studies of circRNAs have just begun, and the physiological roles of circRNAs remain largely unknown. Here, we focused on elucidating the potential role and molecular mechanism of circular forkhead box O3 (circFOXO3) in glioblastoma (GBM) progression. METHODS: First, we analyzed circFOXO3 alterations in GBM and noncancerous tissues through real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Next, we used loss- and gain-of-function approaches to evaluate the effect of circFOXO3 on GBM cell proliferation and invasion. Mechanistically, fluorescent in situ hybridization, RNA pull-down, dual luciferase reporter, and RNA immunoprecipitation assays were performed to confirm the interaction between circFOXO3 and miR-138-5p/miR-432-5p in GBM. An animal model was used to verify the in vitro experimental findings. RESULTS: CircFOXO3 expression was significantly higher in GBM tissues than in noncancerous tissues. GBM cell proliferation and invasion were reduced by circFOXO3 knockdown and enhanced by circFOXO3 overexpression. Further biochemical analysis showed that circFOXO3 exerted its pro-tumorigenic activity by acting as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) to increase expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 (NFAT5) via sponging both miR-138-5p and miR-432-5p. Notably, tumor inhibition by circFOXO3 downregulation could be reversed by miR-138-5p/miR-432-5p inhibitors in GBM cells. Moreover, GBM cells with lower circFOXO3 expression developed less aggressive tumors in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that circFOXO3 can exert regulatory functions in GBM and that ceRNA-mediated microRNA sequestration might be a potential strategy for GBM therapy.
BACKGROUND: Circular RNAs (circRNAs), a newly discovered type of endogenous noncoding RNA, have been proposed to mediate the progression of diverse types of tumors. Systematic studies of circRNAs have just begun, and the physiological roles of circRNAs remain largely unknown. Here, we focused on elucidating the potential role and molecular mechanism of circular forkhead box O3 (circFOXO3) in glioblastoma (GBM) progression. METHODS: First, we analyzed circFOXO3 alterations in GBM and noncancerous tissues through real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Next, we used loss- and gain-of-function approaches to evaluate the effect of circFOXO3 on GBM cell proliferation and invasion. Mechanistically, fluorescent in situ hybridization, RNA pull-down, dual luciferase reporter, and RNA immunoprecipitation assays were performed to confirm the interaction between circFOXO3 and miR-138-5p/miR-432-5p in GBM. An animal model was used to verify the in vitro experimental findings. RESULTS:CircFOXO3 expression was significantly higher in GBM tissues than in noncancerous tissues. GBM cell proliferation and invasion were reduced by circFOXO3 knockdown and enhanced by circFOXO3 overexpression. Further biochemical analysis showed that circFOXO3 exerted its pro-tumorigenic activity by acting as a competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) to increase expression of nuclear factor of activated T cells 5 (NFAT5) via sponging both miR-138-5p and miR-432-5p. Notably, tumor inhibition by circFOXO3 downregulation could be reversed by miR-138-5p/miR-432-5p inhibitors in GBM cells. Moreover, GBM cells with lower circFOXO3 expression developed less aggressive tumors in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that circFOXO3 can exert regulatory functions in GBM and that ceRNA-mediated microRNA sequestration might be a potential strategy for GBM therapy.
Authors: William W Du; Ling Fang; Weining Yang; Nan Wu; Faryal Mehwish Awan; Zhenguo Yang; Burton B Yang Journal: Cell Death Differ Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 15.828
Authors: Carmit Levy; Mehdi Khaled; Dimitrios Iliopoulos; Maja M Janas; Steffen Schubert; Sophie Pinner; Po-Hao Chen; Shuqiang Li; Anne L Fletcher; Satoru Yokoyama; Kenneth L Scott; Levi A Garraway; Jun S Song; Scott R Granter; Shannon J Turley; David E Fisher; Carl D Novina Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: D Williams Parsons; Siân Jones; Xiaosong Zhang; Jimmy Cheng-Ho Lin; Rebecca J Leary; Philipp Angenendt; Parminder Mankoo; Hannah Carter; I-Mei Siu; Gary L Gallia; Alessandro Olivi; Roger McLendon; B Ahmed Rasheed; Stephen Keir; Tatiana Nikolskaya; Yuri Nikolsky; Dana A Busam; Hanna Tekleab; Luis A Diaz; James Hartigan; Doug R Smith; Robert L Strausberg; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; Sueli Mieko Oba Shinjo; Hai Yan; Gregory J Riggins; Darell D Bigner; Rachel Karchin; Nick Papadopoulos; Giovanni Parmigiani; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler Journal: Science Date: 2008-09-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Yunhao Sun; Limin Qiu; Jinjin Chen; Yao Wang; Jun Qian; Lirong Huang; Haitao Ma Journal: Comput Math Methods Med Date: 2020-08-28 Impact factor: 2.238