Literature DB >> 31504547

(R)-Ketamine Rapidly Ameliorates the Decreased Spine Density in the Medial Prefrontal Cortex and Hippocampus of Susceptible Mice After Chronic Social Defeat Stress.

Jiancheng Zhang1,2, Youge Qu1, Lijia Chang1, Yaoyu Pu1, Kenji Hashimoto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recent study demonstrated that spine formation rates by ketamine in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) were not altered at 3-6 h following a single injection, but were markedly altered at 12-24 h. Here, we investigated the acute (3 h post-treatment) effects of (R)-ketamine in the decreased spine density in the medial PFC (mPFC) and hippocampus in susceptible mice after chronic social defeat stress (CSDS).
METHODS: (R)-ketamine (10 mg/kg) or saline was administered intraperitoneally to CSDS-susceptible mice. Dendritic spine density in the mPFC and hippocampus was measured 3 h after a single injection.
RESULTS: (R)-ketamine significantly ameliorated the decreased spine density in the prelimbic area of mPFC, Cornu Ammonis3, and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus of CSDS-susceptible mice.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that (R)-ketamine rapidly ameliorates the decreased spine density in the mPFC and hippocampus of CSDS-susceptible mice, resulting in its rapid-acting antidepressant effects.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of CINP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  (R)-ketamine; Rapid-acting antidepressant; dendritic spine density; hippocampus; medial prefrontal cortex

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31504547      PMCID: PMC6822137          DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyz048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol        ISSN: 1461-1457            Impact factor:   5.176


The discovery of rapid-acting and sustained antidepressant effects of ketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression is serendipitous. A recent study using single-cell 2-photon calcium imaging demonstrated that spine formation rates in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) by (R,S)-ketamine were slow. Here, we report that (R)-ketamine rapidly (<3 h) ameliorates the decreased spine density in the medial PFC of susceptible mice after chronic social defeat stress. Therefore, it is likely that the rapid rescue of spine formation by (R)-ketamine contributes to its rapid-acting antidepressant effects.

Introduction

The discovery of the rapid-acting and sustained antidepressant effects of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) antagonist ketamine in treatment-resistant patients with depression was serendipitous (Krystal et al., 2019). However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effect of ketamine remain to be elucidated (Hashimoto, 2019; Zhang and Hashimoto, 2019a). Chronic stress paradigms, such as chronic social defeat stress (CSDS) and chronic unpredicted mild stress (CUMS), are known to profoundly reduce dendritic spine density and functions in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus; these effects could contribute to the morphological and functional alterations observed in patients with depression (Duman and Aghajanian, 2012; Duman and Duman, 2015). Ketamine (10 mg/kg, 24 h post-treatment) ameliorated the decreased spine synapse number in the medial PFC (mPFC) in mice after CUMS (Li et al., 2011), resulting in its sustained antidepressant effects. Notably, the rapid-acting antidepressant ketamine rapidly increases spine synapse numbers in the PFCs of rodents and reverses the effects of chronic stress. These findings support the neurotrophic and synaptogenic hypothesis of depression and rapid-acting antidepressant actions (Duman and Aghajanian, 2012; Duman and Duman, 2015). (R,S)-ketamine (Ki = 0.53 μM for NMDAR) is an equal amount mixture of (R)-ketamine (or arketamine: Ki = 1.4 μM for NMDAR) and (S)-ketamine (or esketamine: Ki = 0.3 μM for NMDAR; Hashimoto, 2019). On 5 March 2019, the United State Food Drug Administration approved (S)-ketamine nasal spray for treatment-resistant depression. However, preclinical studies demonstrated that (R)-ketamine has greater potency and longer lasting antidepressant effects than (S)-ketamine in rodent models of depression (Zhang et al., 2014a; Yang et al., 2015; Fukumoto et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2018). Importantly, the side effects of (R)-ketamine in rodents were less than those of (R,S)-ketamine and (S)-ketamine (Yang et al., 2015; Hashimoto et al., 2017; Tian et al., 2018a; Chang et al., 2019). We reported that ketamine and its 2 enantiomers ([R]-ketamine and [S]-ketamine; 10 mg/kg at 8 days post-treatment] significantly ameliorated the decreased spine density in the mPFC and hippocampus in CSDS-susceptible mice (Yang et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2017). Interestingly, (R)-ketamine elicited a more potent beneficial effect on the decreased dendritic spine density in the mPFC and hippocampus of CSDS-susceptible mice than (S)-ketamine (Yang et al., 2015). Compared with (S)-ketamine, it is possible that the greater potency of (R)-ketamine for dendritic spine formation contributes to its longer-lasting antidepressant effects (Yang et al., 2015; Hashimoto, 2019). A recent study using single-cell 2-photon calcium imaging in awake mice showed that the effects of ketamine (10 mg/kg) on spine formation in the PFC were slower (Moda-Sava et al., 2019). Spine formation rates were not significantly altered at 3–6 h following a single injection of ketamine, but were markedly altered at 12–24 h (Moda-Sava et al., 2019). This study suggests that dendritic spine formation in the PFC was required for the sustained antidepressant effects of ketamine, but not for its acute antidepressant effects (Moda-Sava et al., 2019). Currently, there are no reports showing acute (3 h post-treatment) effects of ketamine on the decreased spine density in the brain after CSDS or CUMS. The present study was performed to examine whether (R)-ketamine rapidly ameliorates the decreased spine density in the mPFC and hippocampus in CSDS-susceptible mice.

Methods and Materials

Animals

Male, adult, C57BL/6 mice aged 8 weeks (body weight 20-25 g; Japan SLC, Inc., Hamamatsu, Japan) and male, adult, CD1 (ICR) mice aged 13–15 weeks (body weight >40 g; Japan SLC, Inc., Hamamatsu, Japan) were used. Animals were housed under controlled temperatures and 12 hour light/dark cycles (lights on between 07:00 a.m.–7:00 p.m.), with ad libitum food (CE-2; CLEA Japan, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and water. The protocol was approved by the Chiba University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (permission number 1–376). This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Animals were deeply anaesthetized with isoflurane before being killed by cervical dislocation. All efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Materials

(R)-ketamine hydrochloride was prepared by recrystallization of (R,S)-ketamine (Ketalar ketamine hydrochloride, Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceutical Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and D-(-)-tartaric acid, as described previously (Zhang et al., 2014a). The dose (10 mg/kg as hydrochloride) of (R)-ketamine dissolved in the physiological saline was used as previously reported (Zhang et al., 2014a; Yang et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2018).

Chronic Social Defeat Stress Model

The procedure of CSDS was performed as previously reported (Figure 1; Yang et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017; Qu et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2018). The C57BL/6 mice were exposed to a different CD1 aggressor mouse for 10 min per day for 10 consecutive days. When the social defeat session ended, the resident CD1 mouse and the intruder mouse were each housed in half of a cage, separated by a perforated Plexiglas divider to allow visual, olfactory, and auditory contact for the remainder of the 24-h period. At 24 h after the last session, all mice were housed individually. On Day 11, a social interaction test was performed to identify subgroups of mice that were susceptible and unsusceptible to social defeat stress. This was accomplished by placing mice in an interaction test box (42 × 42 cm) with an empty wire-mesh cage (10 × 4.5 cm) located at an end. The movement of the mice was tracked for 2.5 min, followed by 2.5 min in the presence of an unfamiliar aggressor who was confined in the wire-mesh cage. The duration of the subject's presence in the “interaction zone” (defined as the 8 cm–wide area surrounding the wire-mesh cage) was recorded by a stopwatch. The interaction ratio was calculated as the time spent in an interaction zone with an aggressor/time spent in an interaction zone without an aggressor. An interaction ratio of 1 was set as the cut-off: mice with scores <1 were defined as “susceptible” to social defeat stress and those with scores ≥1 were defined as “resilient.” Approximately 70–80% of mice were susceptible after CSDS. Susceptible mice were randomly divided in the subsequent experiments. Control C57BL/6 mice without CSDS were housed in the cage.
Figure 1.

Schedule of CSDS, treatment, and brain collection. CSDS was performed from Day 1 to Day 10. A social interaction test was performed on Day 11 to select susceptible mice. On Day 12, saline (10 ml/kg) or (R)-ketamine (10 mg/kg) was administered i.p. to susceptible mice. Saline (10 ml/kg) was also administered i.p. to control (no CSDS) mice. Golgi-Cox staining in the control mice and CSDS-susceptible mice was performed 3 hours after a single administration of saline or (R)-ketamine. Abbreviations: CSDS, chronic social defeat stress; D, day; i.p., intraperitoneal.

Schedule of CSDS, treatment, and brain collection. CSDS was performed from Day 1 to Day 10. A social interaction test was performed on Day 11 to select susceptible mice. On Day 12, saline (10 ml/kg) or (R)-ketamine (10 mg/kg) was administered i.p. to susceptible mice. Saline (10 ml/kg) was also administered i.p. to control (no CSDS) mice. Golgi-Cox staining in the control mice and CSDS-susceptible mice was performed 3 hours after a single administration of saline or (R)-ketamine. Abbreviations: CSDS, chronic social defeat stress; D, day; i.p., intraperitoneal.

Golgi Staining

As previously reported (Zhang et al., 2014b; Yang et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2017; Qu et al., 2018), Golgi staining was performed using the FD Rapid Golgi Stain TM Kit (FD Neuro Technologies, Inc., Columbia, MD), following the manufacturer's instructions. At 3 h after a single intraperitoneal administration of saline (10 ml/kg) or (R)-ketamine (10 mg/kg), mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and sodium pentobarbital; the brains were removed from the skull and rinsed in double-distilled water. Brains were immersed overnight in the impregnation solution, made by mixing equal volumes of Solution A and B, and were then stored in the dark in fresh solution for 2 weeks. Brains were transferred into Solution C overnight and then stored in the dark in fresh solution at 4°C for 1 week. Coronal brain sections (100 μm thickness) were cut on a cryostat (3050S, Leica Microsystems AG, Wetzlar, Germany), with the chamber temperature set at -20°C. Each section was mounted in Solution C, on saline-coated microscope slides. After absorption of excess solution, sections were dried naturally at room temperature. Dried sections were processed following the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, images of dendrites within the prelimbic (PrL) area and infralimbic (IL) area of the mPFC, dentate gyrus (DG), Cornu Ammonis (CA1), and CA3 of the hippocampus were captured using a 100× objective with a Keyence BZ-9000 Generation microscope (Osaka, Japan). Spines were counted along mPFC, DG, CA1, and CA3 dendrites, starting from their point of origin from the primary dendrite, as previously reported (Yang et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2017; Qu et al., 2018). For spine density measurements, all clearly evaluable areas containing 50–100 μm of secondary dendrites from each imaged neuron were used. To determine the relative spine density, spines on multiple dendritic branches from a single neuron were counted to obtain an average spine number per 10 μm. For spine number measurements, only spines that emerged perpendicular to the dendritic shaft were counted. We analyzed 3 neurons per section and 3 sections per animal. The average value for each region was obtained in each individual. These individual averages were then combined to yield a grand average for each region.

Statistical Analysis

The data are shown as the mean ± standard error of the mean. An analysis was performed using PASW Statistics 20 (formerly SPSS Statistics). Comparisons between groups were performed using a 1-way analysis of variance, followed by a post hoc Tukey test. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Dendritic spine densities in the PrL regions of the mPFC, CA3, and DG of the hippocampus from susceptible mice were significantly lower than those from control mice, consistent with previous reports (Figure 2A, D, andE; Yang et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2017; Qu et al., 2018). In contrast, spine densities in the IL regions of the mPFC and CA1 of the hippocampus from susceptible mice were not different from those in control mice, consistent with previous reports (Figure 2B and C; Yang et al., 2015; Dong et al., 2017; Qu et al., 2018). A single injection of (R)-ketamine (10 mg/kg at 3 h post-treatment) significantly ameliorated the decreased spine densities in the PrL areas of the mPFC, CA3, and DG of the hippocampus from susceptible mice (Figure 2A, D, andE).
Figure 2.

Rapid effects of (R)-ketamine on the decreased dendritic spine density in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in susceptible mice after CSDS. (A-E) Dendritic spine density in the PrL and IL regions of the mPFC, CA1, CA3, and DG of the hippocampus. The bar is 10 μm. (A) PrL region of mPFC (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 4.825; P = 0.019). (B) IL region of mPFC (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 0.027; P = 0.973). (C) CA1 of hippocampus (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 0.019; P = 0.982). (D) CA3 of hippocampus (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 8.144; P = 0.002). (E) DG of hippocampus (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 14.070; P < 0.001). The values represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 8/group). #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001, compared with saline-treated CSDS-susceptible mice. Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; CSDS, chronic social defeat stress; DG, dentate gyrus; IL, infralimbic; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; N.S., not significant; PrL, prelimbic; R-KT, (R)-ketamine.

Rapid effects of (R)-ketamine on the decreased dendritic spine density in the prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in susceptible mice after CSDS. (A-E) Dendritic spine density in the PrL and IL regions of the mPFC, CA1, CA3, and DG of the hippocampus. The bar is 10 μm. (A) PrL region of mPFC (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 4.825; P = 0.019). (B) IL region of mPFC (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 0.027; P = 0.973). (C) CA1 of hippocampus (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 0.019; P = 0.982). (D) CA3 of hippocampus (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 8.144; P = 0.002). (E) DG of hippocampus (1-way ANOVA, F2,21 = 14.070; P < 0.001). The values represent the mean ± standard error of the mean (n = 8/group). #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, and ###P < 0.001, compared with saline-treated CSDS-susceptible mice. Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; CSDS, chronic social defeat stress; DG, dentate gyrus; IL, infralimbic; mPFC, medial prefrontal cortex; N.S., not significant; PrL, prelimbic; R-KT, (R)-ketamine.

Discussion

A recent study demonstrated that (R,S)-ketamine (10 mg/kg at 3–6 h post-treatment) did not affect the decreased spine density in the PFC of chronically corticosterone-treated mice, whereas (R,S)-ketamine markedly improved spine formation at 12–24 h (Moda-Sava et al., 2019). This observation suggests that spine formation is not involved in the rapid-acting antidepressant effects of (R,S)-ketamine, since (R,S)-ketamine (at 3–48 h post-treatment) rapidly attenuated the increased immobility time in the tail suspension test (TST). In this study, we used (R)-ketamine, since (R)-ketamine elicited more potent antidepressant effects than (R,S)-ketamine and (S)-ketamine in a CSDS model (Chang et al., 2019). We found that (R)-ketamine (at 10 mg/kg) rapidly (<3 h) ameliorated the decreased spine densities in the PrL regions of the mPFC, CA3, and DG of the hippocampus in CSDS-susceptible mice. Furthermore, (R,S)-ketamine (or [R]-ketamine; at 10 mg/kg) rapidly (<3–4 h) attenuated the increased immobility time of TST in CSDS-susceptible mice (Tian et al., 2018b; Zhang and Hashimoto, 2019b). Although we did not investigate spines in the same regions of the same mice using the 2-photon imaging technique, it seems that (R)-ketamine could rapidly normalize the decreased spine densities of susceptible mice to control levels, resulting in its rapid-acting antidepressant effects. It was reported that (R,S)-ketamine (5 mg/kg at 3 h post-treatment) rescued the decreased densities of thin spines, but not mushroom spines, in the mPFCs of male rats subjected to isolation stress (Sarkar and Kabbaj, 2016). Although the decline in total spine density was a cumulative effect of the declines in thin spines and mushroom spines, it has been suggested that the acute increase in spine density by ketamine was mediated mostly through an increase in thin spines (new, immature spines; Sarkar and Kabbaj, 2016). In addition, (S)-ketamine (15 mg/kg) reversed dendritic spine deficits in <1 h in CA1 pyramidal neurons of Flinders sensitive rats with a depression-like phenotype (Treccani et al., 2019). Cumulatively, it is likely that normalization of the decreased spine density in the brain by (R)-ketamine is more rapid. Moda-Sava et al. (2019) used a chronic (21 days) corticosterone exposure model as a mouse model of depression. Chronic corticosterone treatment decreased dendritic spine density throughout the PFC, including in the anterior cingulate, PrL, and IL subregions, whereas ketamine had the opposite effect. Although ketamine showed a rapid (3 h post-treatment) antidepressant-like effect in TST, spine formation rates were not significantly altered at 3 to 6 hours post-treatment, but were markedly elevated at 12 to 24 hours. It has been suggested that the rescue of spine formation by ketamine is associated with its behavioral changes (Li et al., 2011; Duman and Aghajanian, 2012; Duman and Duman, 2015). However, this paper showed that ketamine-induced spine formation affects the immobility time of TST, but not anhedonia, in the sucrose preference test, suggesting a specific role of the PFC and other regions for motivated escape behavior and anhedonia (Moda-Sava et al., 2019). Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is known to produce depression-like behaviors in rodents 24 hours after a single dose (Dantzer et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2014b). In addition, in vivo imaging using 2-photon microscopy showed long-term changes in dendritic spines in the mouse brain after a single dose of LPS (Kondo et al., 2011). Therefore, it is of interest to investigate the acute (<3 h) and sustained (<24 h) effects of ketamine and its enantiomers for spine formation in LPS-treated rodents, using single-cell 2-photon calcium imaging. In this study, we did not examine the effects of (R)-ketamine in the spine formation of control mice, since (R)-ketamine did not show antidepressant-like effects in control (no CSDS) mice (Zhang et al., 2018). In addition, Nugent et al. (2019) reported that ketamine caused depressive symptoms (i.e., anhedonia) in healthy control subjects, indicating that ketamine does not have antidepressant effects in healthy control subjects. Nonetheless, it is also of interest to investigate whether (R)-ketamine can affect dendritic spine density in the control mice. In this study, we did not measure the synaptic proteins [i.e., PSD-95 (postsynaptic density protein 95) and GluA1 (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor 1)] in the mPFC and hippocampus in CSDS-susceptible mice. It is of interest to examine whether (R)-ketamine can ameliorate the decreased expression of these proteins in these regions, since ketamine and (R)-ketamine ameliorated these proteins (Duman and Aghajanian, 2012; Duman and Duman, 2015; Yang et al, 2015; Dong et al, 2017). In conclusion, this study indicates that (R)-ketamine rapidly (<3 h) ameliorates the decreased spine densities in the PrL regions of the mPFC, CA3, and DG in susceptible mice after CSDS, suggesting this mechanism for its rapid-acting antidepressant effects. Further detailed study using single-cell 2-photon calcium imaging is needed to confirm the acute effects of ketamine and its enantiomers for spine formation in rodents with depression-like phenotypes.
  26 in total

Review 1.  An update on ketamine and its two enantiomers as rapid-acting antidepressants.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Expert Rev Neurother       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.618

2.  Lack of Opioid System in the Antidepressant Actions of Ketamine.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 3.  Spine synapse remodeling in the pathophysiology and treatment of depression.

Authors:  Catharine H Duman; Ronald S Duman
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 4.  Ketamine: A Paradigm Shift for Depression Research and Treatment.

Authors:  John H Krystal; Chadi G Abdallah; Gerard Sanacora; Dennis S Charney; Ronald S Duman
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Comparison of antidepressant and side effects in mice after intranasal administration of (R,S)-ketamine, (R)-ketamine, and (S)-ketamine.

Authors:  Lijia Chang; Kai Zhang; Yaoyu Pu; Youge Qu; Si-Ming Wang; Zhongwei Xiong; Qian Ren; Chao Dong; Yuko Fujita; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  R (-)-ketamine shows greater potency and longer lasting antidepressant effects than S (+)-ketamine.

Authors:  Ji-Chun Zhang; Su-Xia Li; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Rapid and Sustained Antidepressant Action of the mGlu2/3 Receptor Antagonist MGS0039 in the Social Defeat Stress Model: Comparison with Ketamine.

Authors:  Chao Dong; Ji-Chun Zhang; Wei Yao; Qian Ren; Min Ma; Chun Yang; Shigeyuki Chaki; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  Reduction of dopamine D2/3 receptor binding in the striatum after a single administration of esketamine, but not R-ketamine: a PET study in conscious monkeys.

Authors:  Kenji Hashimoto; Takeharu Kakiuchi; Hiroyuki Ohba; Shingo Nishiyama; Hideo Tsukada
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 5.270

9.  Role of Inflammatory Bone Markers in the Antidepressant Actions of (R)-Ketamine in a Chronic Social Defeat Stress Model.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Min Ma; Chao Dong; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Lack of Antidepressant Effects of Low-Voltage-Sensitive T-Type Calcium Channel Blocker Ethosuximide in a Chronic Social Defeat Stress Model: Comparison with (R)-Ketamine.

Authors:  Zheng Tian; Chao Dong; Kai Zhang; Lijia Chang; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.176

View more
  11 in total

1.  Astrocyte reactivation in medial prefrontal cortex contributes to obesity-promoted depressive-like behaviors.

Authors:  Gang Yu; Feng Cao; Tingting Hou; Yunsheng Cheng; Benli Jia; Liang Yu; Wanjing Chen; Yanyan Xu; Mingming Chen; Yong Wang
Journal:  J Neuroinflammation       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 9.587

2.  Adjunct treatment with ketamine enhances the therapeutic effects of extinction learning after chronic unpredictable stress.

Authors:  Denisse Paredes; Anna R Knippenberg; Sarah E Bulin; Lydia J Keppler; David A Morilak
Journal:  Neurobiol Stress       Date:  2022-07-08

3.  Structure and function differences in the prelimbic cortex to basolateral amygdala circuit mediate trait vulnerability in a novel model of acute social defeat stress in male mice.

Authors:  Yael S Grossman; Clementine Fillinger; Alessia Manganaro; George Voren; Rachel Waldman; Tiffany Zou; William G Janssen; Paul J Kenny; Dani Dumitriu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 8.294

Review 4.  Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of ketamine enantiomers and its metabolites.

Authors:  Chun Yang; Jianjun Yang; Ailin Luo; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  An Integrative Approach to Ketamine Therapy May Enhance Multiple Dimensions of Efficacy: Improving Therapeutic Outcomes With Treatment Resistant Depression.

Authors:  Sherry-Anne Muscat; Glenn Hartelius; Courtenay Richards Crouch; Kevin W Morin
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 6.  Rapid-acting antidepressants and the circadian clock.

Authors:  Shogo Sato; Blynn Bunney; Lucia Mendoza-Viveros; William Bunney; Emiliana Borrelli; Paolo Sassone-Corsi; Ricardo Orozco-Solis
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 8.294

Review 7.  Psychedelics and Other Psychoplastogens for Treating Mental Illness.

Authors:  Maxemiliano V Vargas; Retsina Meyer; Arabo A Avanes; Mark Rus; David E Olson
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-10-04       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 8.  Serotonergic Psychedelics in Neural Plasticity.

Authors:  Kacper Lukasiewicz; Jacob J Baker; Yi Zuo; Ju Lu
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 6.261

9.  Microglial ERK-NRBP1-CREB-BDNF signaling in sustained antidepressant actions of (R)-ketamine.

Authors:  Wei Yao; Qianqian Cao; Shilin Luo; Lujuan He; Chun Yang; Jiaxu Chen; Qi Qi; Kenji Hashimoto; Ji-Chun Zhang
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 13.437

10.  Repeated intermittent administration of (R)-ketamine during juvenile and adolescent stages prevents schizophrenia-relevant phenotypes in adult offspring after maternal immune activation: a role of TrkB signaling.

Authors:  Yunfei Tan; Yuko Fujita; Yaoyu Pu; Lijia Chang; Youge Qu; Xinming Wang; Kenji Hashimoto
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 5.760

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.