Polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) nanoparticles assembled from plasmid DNA (pDNA) and polycations such as linear polyethylenimine (lPEI) represent a major nonviral delivery vehicle for gene therapy tested thus far. Efforts to control the size, shape, and surface properties of pDNA/polycation nanoparticles have been primarily focused on fine-tuning the molecular structures of the polycationic carriers and on assembly conditions such as medium polarity, pH, and temperature. However, reproducible production of these nanoparticles hinges on the ability to control the assembly kinetics, given the nonequilibrium nature of the assembly process and nanoparticle composition. Here we adopt a kinetically controlled mixing process, termed flash nanocomplexation (FNC), that accelerates the mixing of pDNA solution with polycation lPEI solution to match the PEC assembly kinetics through turbulent mixing in a microchamber. This achieves explicit control of the kinetic conditions for pDNA/lPEI nanoparticle assembly, as demonstrated by the tunability of nanoparticle size, composition, and pDNA payload. Through a combined experimental and simulation approach, we prepared pDNA/lPEI nanoparticles having an average of 1.3 to 21.8 copies of pDNA per nanoparticle and average size of 35 to 130 nm in a more uniform and scalable manner than bulk mixing methods. Using these nanoparticles with defined compositions and sizes, we showed the correlation of pDNA payload and nanoparticle formulation composition with the transfection efficiencies and toxicity in vivo. These nanoparticles exhibited long-term stability at -20 °C for at least 9 months in a lyophilized formulation, validating scalable manufacture of an off-the-shelf nanoparticle product with well-defined characteristics as a gene medicine.
Polyelectrolyte complex (PEC) nanoparticles assembled from plasmid DNA (pDNA) and polycations such as linear n>an class="Chemical">polyethylenimine (lPEI) represent a major nonviral delivery vehicle for gene therapy tested thus far. Efforts to control the size, shape, and surface properties of pDNA/polycation nanoparticles have been primarily focused on fine-tuning the molecular structures of the polycationic carriers and on assembly conditions such as medium polarity, pH, and temperature. However, reproducible production of these nanoparticles hinges on the ability to control the assembly kinetics, given the nonequilibrium nature of the assembly process and nanoparticle composition. Here we adopt a kinetically controlled mixing process, termed flash nanocomplexation (FNC), that accelerates the mixing of pDNA solution with polycation lPEI solution to match the PEC assembly kinetics through turbulent mixing in a microchamber. This achieves explicit control of the kinetic conditions for pDNA/lPEI nanoparticle assembly, as demonstrated by the tunability of nanoparticle size, composition, and pDNA payload. Through a combined experimental and simulation approach, we prepared pDNA/lPEI nanoparticles having an average of 1.3 to 21.8 copies of pDNA per nanoparticle and average size of 35 to 130 nm in a more uniform and scalable manner than bulk mixing methods. Using these nanoparticles with defined compositions and sizes, we showed the correlation of pDNA payload and nanoparticle formulation composition with the transfection efficiencies and toxicity in vivo. These nanoparticles exhibited long-term stability at -20 °C for at least 9 months in a lyophilized formulation, validating scalable manufacture of an off-the-shelf nanoparticle product with well-defined characteristics as a gene medicine.
Authors: Sissel Juul; Christine J F Nielsen; Rodrigo Labouriau; Amit Roy; Cinzia Tesauro; Pia W Jensen; Charlotte Harmsen; Emil L Kristoffersen; Ya-Ling Chiu; Rikke Frøhlich; Paola Fiorani; Janet Cox-Singh; David Tordrup; Jørn Koch; Anne-Lise Bienvenu; Alessandro Desideri; Stephane Picot; Eskild Petersen; Kam W Leong; Yi-Ping Ho; Magnus Stougaard; Birgitta R Knudsen Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Mengqian Lu; Adem Ozcelik; Christopher L Grigsby; Yanhui Zhao; Feng Guo; Kam W Leong; Tony Jun Huang Journal: Nano Today Date: 2016-11-12 Impact factor: 20.722
Authors: Jose Luis Santos; Yong Ren; John Vandermark; Maani M Archang; John-Michael Williford; Heng-Wen Liu; Jason Lee; Tza-Huei Wang; Hai-Quan Mao Journal: Small Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 13.281
Authors: John-Michael Williford; Maani M Archang; Il Minn; Yong Ren; Mark Wo; John Vandermark; Paul B Fisher; Martin G Pomper; Hai-Quan Mao Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2016-03-03
Authors: Thomas C B Klauber; Rikke V Søndergaard; Rupa R Sawant; Vladimir P Torchilin; Thomas L Andresen Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2016-02-13 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Hye-Hyun Ahn; Christine Carrington; Yizong Hu; Heng-Wen Liu; Christy Ng; Hwanhee Nam; Andrew Park; Catherine Stace; Will West; Hai-Quan Mao; Martin G Pomper; Christopher G Ullman; Il Minn Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-05-06 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Yining Zhu; Ruochen Shen; Ivan Vuong; Rebekah A Reynolds; Melanie J Shears; Zhi-Cheng Yao; Yizong Hu; Won June Cho; Jiayuan Kong; Sashank K Reddy; Sean C Murphy; Hai-Quan Mao Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Yizong Hu; Yining Zhu; Nolan D Sutherland; David R Wilson; Marion Pang; Ester Liu; Jacob R Staub; Cynthia A Berlinicke; Donald J Zack; Jordan J Green; Sashank K Reddy; Hai-Quan Mao Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2021-07-06 Impact factor: 12.262