Ji Hyun Kim1, Han Hong Lee2, Ho Seok Seo1, Yoon Ju Jung1, Cho Hyun Park1. 1. Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea. Electronic address: painkiller9@catholic.ac.kr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) follow-up schedule after curative surgery is universally recommended based on the pathologic stage, but their details, including intervals and modalities of surveillance have not yet been standardised. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of GC recurrence by stage to establish optimal postoperative surveillance strategies. METHODS: Medical information on 5095 patients with GC who underwent curative intent gastrectomy in our institution between January 1989 and December 2013 was reviewed retrospectively. Moreover, 656 patients who had recurrences after radical surgery were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics, timing and pattern of recurrence, and survival data of these patients were analysed. RESULTS: Among the 656 patients, 50 (7.6%), 123 (18.8%), and 483 (73.6%) had stages I, II, and III GC, respectively. The median times to initial recurrence in patients with stages I, II, and III GC were 23.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 13.0-33.0 months), 13.0 months (IQR, 9.0-25.0 months), and 12.0 months (IQR, 7.0-21.0 months), respectively. In patients with stage I GC, more than half (58%) of them had distant organ metastasis; otherwise, peritoneal dissemination (39%) was the most common pattern in patients with stage III GC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low incidence, the time of initial recurrence in stage I GC was longer than those in stage II and III GC. Moreover, the pattern of initial recurrence was also different according to the pathologic stage. Therefore, clinicians should consider stage-specific differences of recurrence in setting up surveillance strategies after curative surgery for GC patients.
BACKGROUND:Gastric cancer (GC) follow-up schedule after curative surgery is universally recommended based on the pathologic stage, but their details, including intervals and modalities of surveillance have not yet been standardised. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of GC recurrence by stage to establish optimal postoperative surveillance strategies. METHODS: Medical information on 5095 patients with GC who underwent curative intent gastrectomy in our institution between January 1989 and December 2013 was reviewed retrospectively. Moreover, 656 patients who had recurrences after radical surgery were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics, timing and pattern of recurrence, and survival data of these patients were analysed. RESULTS: Among the 656 patients, 50 (7.6%), 123 (18.8%), and 483 (73.6%) had stages I, II, and III GC, respectively. The median times to initial recurrence in patients with stages I, II, and III GC were 23.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 13.0-33.0 months), 13.0 months (IQR, 9.0-25.0 months), and 12.0 months (IQR, 7.0-21.0 months), respectively. In patients with stage I GC, more than half (58%) of them had distant organ metastasis; otherwise, peritoneal dissemination (39%) was the most common pattern in patients with stage III GC. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the low incidence, the time of initial recurrence in stage I GC was longer than those in stage II and III GC. Moreover, the pattern of initial recurrence was also different according to the pathologic stage. Therefore, clinicians should consider stage-specific differences of recurrence in setting up surveillance strategies after curative surgery for GC patients.