The 2-minute walk test is not a valid method to determine aerobic capacity in persons with Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Walking tests, like the 2-minute fast walk test, are simple, inexpensive performance-based tests, and therefore seem attractive to estimate the aerobic fitness in people with chronic diseases.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the criterion validity of the 2-minute fast walk test for estimating aerobic capacity in patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), by comparing it with the peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak in mL/kg/min) as measured by Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) on a cycle ergometer.
METHODS: The 2 min fast walk test was performed on a marked indoor trajectory, using a static start protocol. Aerobic capacity (VO2peak, in mL/kg/min) was derived from CPET on a cycle ergometer. Criterion validity was tested by means of Pearson's correlation coefficient and should be at least 0.70 for a good criterion validity of the 2 min walk test. Linear regression analysis was applied to more precisely estimate VO2peak.
RESULTS: In total 141 people with severe MS-related fatigue (mean age 47.0 years (range 23-68 years), 73% women, median disease duration 7.8 years (range 0.3 - 28.7 years)) performed both tests. The distance walked in two minutes ranged from 52.0 to 290.0 m (mean 175.1 m, sd 44.9 m), while the VO2peak varied between 11.31 and 40.28 mL/kg/min (mean 22.52 mL/kg/min, sd 6.07 mL/kg/min). The correlation between the 2 min walk test and VO2peak was 0.441 (95% CI: 0.309-0.570). The absolute residual error in estimated VO2peak was 5.47 mL/kg/min.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the poor correlation found between the 2 min walk test and VO2peak, the 2-min walk test cannot be recommended as a valid alternative for estimating aerobic capacity in persons with MS.

Introduction

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using ergometry (e.g. cycling, treadmill walking, rowing, stepping) combined with gas exchange analysis is considered the most common, valid and reliable method for the assessment of aerobic capacity in healthy people and people with medical conditions (Thompson, Gordon, & Pescatello, 2010; Valet, Lejeune, Hakizimana, & Stoquart, 2017). Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), the main outcome parameter of CPET, is accepted as the criterion measure or gold standard of aerobic capacity. However, laboratory-based fitness tests require expensive and cumbersome equipment and do require trained staff with specialized knowledge, resulting in limited availability in daily clinical practice. Walking tests, like the 2-minute fast walk test, are simple, inexpensive performance-based tests, that might be a good proxy measure for aerobic fitness (Valet et al., 2017).

Fixed time walk tests measuring the distance walked over extended periods of time (e.g. 6 min walk test) are widely used to characterize a patient’s functional endurance and submaximal aerobic fitness in medical research and clinical practice (Cahalin, Mathier, Semigran, Dec, & DiSalvo, 1996; ERS Task Force, Palange, Ward, Carlsen, Casaburi, Gallagher, Gosselink, O’Donnell, Puente-Maestu, Schols, Singh, & Whipp, 2007; Mandic, Walker, Stevens, Nye, Body, Barclay, & Williams, 2013). Indeed, these tests were originally directed at patients with cardiovascular or lung diseases, but have since been more broadly applied (Solway, Brooks, Lacasse, & Thomas 2001; Mayorga-Vega, Bocanegra-Parrilla, Ornelas, & Viciana, 2016; Marzolini, Oh, Corbett, Dooks, Calouro, MacIntosh, Goodman, & Brooks, 2016). In patients with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), timed walk tests are most commonly applied to quantify walking performance (Gijbels, Dalgas, Romberg, de Groot, Bethoux, Vaney, Gebara, Medina, Maamâgi, Rasova, de Noordhout, Knuts, & Feys, 2012). In addition, some authors recommend to use walk tests as submaximal aerobic tests or so-called field exercise tests to estimate the exercise tolerance (i.e. aerobic fitness) of people with MS (Valet et al., 2017; Mayorga-Vega et al., 2016; Paul, Coote, Crosbie, Dixon, Hale, Holloway, McCrone, Miller, Saxton, Sincock, & White, 2014; Langeskov-Christensen, Heine, Kwakkel, & Dalgas, 2015).

In severely fatigued patients with MS, it was hypothesized that a low level of aerobic fitness might be an important target for treatment intervention, or a mediating factor in explaining therapy effects. Therefore, the aerobic capacity of participants of the TReating FAtigue in MS (TREFAMS-ACE) research programme, with three randomized clinical trials on Aerobic training, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, and Energy Conservation Management respectively, was assessed at fixed time points during the one-year follow-up (Heine, Verschuren, Hoogervorst, van Munster, Hacking, Visser-Meily, Twisk, Beckerman, de Groot, Kwakkel; & TREFAMS-ACE study group, 2017; van den Akker, Beckerman, Collette, Twisk, Bleijenberg, Dekker, Knoop, de Groot; & TREFAMS-ACE Study Group, 2017).

The objective of the study described in this paper was to determine the criterion validity of the 2 min walk test as a less resource-intensive alternative to CPET for testing the aerobic capacity of people with MS.

Methods

Participants

In this study, cross-sectional baseline data of two randomized clinical trials (RCTs), i.e. TREFAMS-Aerobic Training and TREFAMS-Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, were used (Heine et al., 2017, van den Akker et al., 2017). Participants who completed both the CPET and the 2 min walk test were included in the analyses. Inclusion criteria of the RCTs were; diagnosed with MS and severe fatigue indicated by a score of ≥35 on the fatigue domain of the Checklist Individual Strength (CIS20r); ambulatory status (i.e., Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score <6); no diagnosis of depression (i.e., Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score <11); no initiation or change to pharmacologic treatment for fatigue during the previous 3 months; and aged 18 to 70 years. The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (approval number 2010/289), and conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was signed by all participants prior to their participation.

Cardiorespiratory exercise testing

To evaluate aerobic capacity, participants performed a CPET including gas exchange measurement on a calibrated electromagnetic bicycle ergometer (Corival, Lode, Groningen, the Netherlands). The gas exchange of each participant was measured using breath-by-breath analysis (Quark CPET, COSMED, Rome, Italy). VO2peak was defined as the highest recorded 30 s mean during the final 2 min of exercise, and was expressed in mL/kg/min (Balady, Arena, Sietsema, Myers, Coke, Fletcher, . . .  .& Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research, 2010; Heine, van den Akker, Verschuren, Visser-Meily, Kwakkel, & TREFAMS-ACE Study Group, 2015; Driehuis, van den Akker, de Groot, Beckerman, 2018). In the exercise physiology literature, the terms VO2max and VO2peak are sometimes used interchangeably (Langeskov-Christensen et al., 2015). For clarity of this article, we prefer VO2peak, i.e. the peak value the individual has achieved during the exercise test. The most common primary criterion for attainment of maximum aerobic capacity in adults is a VO2 plateau despite a further increase in work rate. However, as only one-third of healthy persons are able to reach a VO2 plateau, secondary criteria are often added (Langeskov-Christensen et al., 2015). Therefore, the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) was also measured; this is the ratio of CO2 produced and O2 consumed in 1 breath, and increases with workload. Heart rate (HR) was measured continuously with a heart rate monitor (COSMED, S.r.l, Rome, Italy). Measurements commenced in a sitting position at rest for 3 min, after which the participant performed a 3 min warm-up by cycling at ≥60 rpm with a workload of 25 Watts (W). After the warm-up, the workload progressively increased each minute by 10 W for women and 15 W for men. Participants continued to cycle at a cadence of ≥60 rpm throughout the test. The exercise test was terminated due to volitional exhaustion, a cadence <45 rpm or for safety reasons; stopping criteria compliant with the American College of Sports Medicine guidelines for clinical exercise testing (Thompson et al., 2010). At the end of the CPET, participants were asked to rate their perceived exertion on the validated Borg Scale, which rates from 6 (“no exertion at all”) to 20 (“maximal exertion”). The secondary maximal exercise criteria are met at a perceived exertion ≥17 on the Borg scale, an RER > 1.10, or an HR within 90% of calculated maximal HR (220 – age, in years) (Balady et al., 2010; Heine et al., 2015; Driehuis et al., 2018, Langeskov-Christensen et al., 2015).

The 2 min walk test

In each study centre, the 2 min walk test was performed on marked indoor trajectories of 30 or 32 m, using the same static start protocol. Participants were allowed to use walking aids and devices during the test as they would when walking outdoors. They were instructed to walk as fast as possible (brisk walking without running) for 2 minutes. When 1 minute had elapsed, they were told “You are doing well; you have 1 minute left”. The distance covered after 2 min was documented.

Demographic and disease characteristics included were gender, age, body height (cm), body weight (kg), time since diagnosis and type of MS (classified as relapsing-remitting, primary progressive, or secondary progressive). Disease severity was determined by a neurologist or rehabilitation physician using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (Kurtzke, 1983).

Statistical analyses

The strength of the relation between the 2 min fast walk test and VO2peak was analysed by means of Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and should be at least be 0.70 for a good criterion validity of the 2 min walk test (Terwee, Bot, de Boer, van der Windt, Knol, Dekker, Bouter, & de Vet, 2007; Pin, 2014).

An univariate regression analysis was used to estimate the predicted VO2peak from the 2 min walk test, the percentage of explained variance in VO2peak, and the standard error of estimate between the predicted VO2peak and the measured VO2peak. A Bland-Altman plot illustrates the mean differences between the measured VO2peak and the VO2peak predicted from the 2 min walk test distance (m) and 95% limits of agreement (Bland & Altman, 1986).

To estimate VO2peak more precisely from the 2 min walk test, a multiple linear regression model was developed, including the independent variables age, gender, type of MS, EDSS, body height (cm). Variables were included in the final model if they made a significant independent contribution (P < 0.05) to the explained variance in measured VO2peak. The added contribution of each variable to the prediction of VO2peak was expressed as partial correlation (partial R), that is the correlation that remains between VO2peak and the independent variables after removing the correlation that is due to their mutual association with the other independent variables. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0. The linear regression models were checked for any violations of the assumptions of normality, linearity, and equality of variances.

Results

VO2peak and 2 min walk distance were available from 80 TREFAMS-Aerobic Training participants and 61 TREFAMS-Cognitive Behavioural Therapy participants. Enrolment occurred between October 2011 and December 2014. The mean age of the 141 participants was 47.0 years (range 23–68 years), 73% were women. The median disease duration was 7.8 years (range 0.3 – 28.7 years), with a median EDSS score of 3.0 (range 0.0–6.0). With regard to the type of MS, 78.3% participants had a relapsing remitting MS, whereas the others had a progressive type of MS.

The 2 min walk test and CPET

Overall, the distance participants walked in two minutes ranged from 52.0 to 290.0 m (mean 175.1 m, sd 44.9 m), while VO2peak varied between 11.31 and 40.28 mL/kg/min (mean 22.52 mL/kg/min, sd 6.07 mL/kg/min). The cardiorespiratory fitness in men was significantly higher than in women (mean difference 4.17 mL/kg/min, 95% CI: 1.99–6.35). However, the distance walked in 2 minutes did not significantly differ between men and women (mean difference 11.6 m; 95% CI:–5.2 to 28.4).

The Pearson’s correlation coefficient of the 2 min walk test distance and measured VO2peak was 0.441 (95% CI: 0.309–0.570), and smaller than the 0.70 criterion (Fig. 1). The 2 min walk test distance explained 19.5% of the variance in VO2peak. The absolute residual error in estimated VO2peak was 5.47 mL/kg/min. Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 (i.e. the Bland and Altman plot with – 9.82 to 13.47 mL/kg/min as limits of agreement) further illustrate the consequences of inaccurate estimation of VO2peak; in patients with a high VO2peak, the 2 min fast walk test underestimates their VO2peak, and in patients with a low VO2peak the VO2peak is overestimated by using the distance of the 2 min fast walk test. The correlation between the average VO2peak (on the×axis in the Bland and Altman plot) and the difference between measured VO2peak – predicted VO2peak (on the Y-axis) is 0.713, indicating the systematic inaccuracy of the prediction.

Fig.1

Scatterplot with correlation line between 2 min walk test distance (in meters) and the measured VO2peak (in mL/kg/min).

Fig.2

Plot of measured VO2peak in mL/kg/min by VO2peak estimated from 2 min walk test distance in meters. The diagonal line represents the line of perfect agreement.

Fig.3

Bland and Altman plot of agreement between measured VO2peak in mL/kg/min and VO2peak estimated from 2 min walk test distance in meters. The horizontal line at 0 represents perfect agreement.

The multiple regression analyses revealed age, gender, and EDSS as statistically significant interfering factors in predicting VO2peak, with increased explained variance R2 of 33.2%. The absolute standard error of estimate was reduced to 4.87 mL/kg/min. The minor (univariate) contribution of the 2 min walk test was no longer statistically significant (see Table I).

Discussion

This study shows that the criterion validity of the 2 min fast walk test as a simple clinical exercise test is insufficient to accurately estimate the aerobic capacity of severely fatigued persons with MS. The walking distance achieved in 2 minutes of fast walking is not a valid predictor of their VO2peak.

In context of published literature

The criterion validity of 2 min walk test in estimating VO2peak was investigated in two other study populations (Leung, Chan, Sykes, & Chan, 2006; Bernstein, Despars, Singh, Avalos, Stansbury, & Light, 1994). In 45 elderly Chinese patients experiencing moderate to severe exercise limitations due to COPD, a Pearson correlation of 0.555 was found between the 2 min walk test (mean 130.8 m, sd 28.8) and VO2peak (mean 9.91 mL/kg/min, sd 2.63) (Leung et al., 2006). In the same study, the correlation of the 6 min walk test with VO2peak was 0.65, which led the authors to conclude that the 2 min walk test can assess exercise capacity as accurately as walking tests of longer duration (Leung et al., 2006). A small study in nine elderly men with COPD also reported on the criterion validity of the 2 min walk distance, however, using six 2 min intervals as part of the 12 min walk test (Bernstein et al., 1994). The correlations with VO2peak were more or less similar for all of the different 2 min intervals (r = 0.66–0.71), except for the first 2 minutes in which the largest distance was covered (r = 0.55) (Bernstein et al., 1994).

In patients with MS, the prediction of aerobic capacity using other test outcomes, was investigated by Kuspinar and colleagues (Kuspinar, Andersen, Teng, Asano, & Mayo, 2010). A submaximal step test, grip strength, the 6 min walk test, body weight and sex were strong predictors of exercise capacity in 59 patients with MS (average age 39 years, 66% women, median EDSS score 1.5, mean VO2max 27.6 mL/kg/min). VO2max relative to body weight (i.e. expressed in mL/kg/min), predicted by the step test, the 6 min walk test, and adjusted for sex, explaining 55% of the variance. Other physical tests did not improve the prediction (Kuspinar et al., 2010).

The VO2max can be more accurately predicted by the linearly related maximum work rate derived from the same incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer (Motl & Fernhall, 2012). In 32 women with RRMS (mean VO2max 22.1 mL/kg/min, mean age 43.6 years, median self-reported EDSS 1.5) the VO2max prediction equation resulted in an absolute standard error of estimate of 131.3 mL, and an explained variance of 89%. The findings of this study imply for clinical practice that maximum work rate measured during an incremental exercise test without advanced ventilation and gas exchange measurement is suitable for accurate prediction of VO2max (Motl & Fernhall, 2012).

Most often, walk tests of a longer duration or distance are used as submaximal exercise tests (Mayorga-Vega et al., 2016; Mänttäri, Suni, Sievänen, Husu, Vähä-Ypyä, Valkeinen, Tokola & Vasankari, 2018). We are not aware of criterion validity studies in patients with MS, in which for instance the distance of the 6 min walk test as the single predictor fulfils the 0.70 criterion of sufficient criterion validity to predict VO2peak. Nonetheless, the 6 min walk test is part of the core outcome set as a measure of exercise tolerance in people with MS (Paul et al., 2014). As the distance covered during a 2 min walk test highly correlates with the distance covered during a 6 min walk test (Gijbels, Op ‘t Eijnde, & Feys P, 2011; Scalzitti, Harwood, Maring, Leach, Ruckert, & Costello, 2018; Butland, Pang, Gross, Woodcock, & Geddes, 1982), it was expected that the 2 min walk would also highly correlate with VO2peak. In our study population, it is assumed that the duration of the 2 min walk test was too short to stress the cardiopulmonary system adequately enough for predicting the VO2peak. A healthy reference population, however, achieved 70% of their predicted maximum heart rate during the 2 min walk test (Selman, de Camargo, Santos, Lanza, & Dal Corso, 2014). In patients with COPD, the 6 min walk test was more exhausting to perform and correlated stronger with VO2peak, than the 2 min walk test (Leung et al., 2006).

Study limitations

A cycle ergometer was used to measure VO2peak, because this test is generally safer and easier to administer in patients with MS than using a treadmill walking test. Twelve patients (8.5%) used a walking aid during the 2 min walk test. In all participants, their walking ability might have hampered their performance on the 2 min walk test. In patients with MS it is worthwhile to investigate the concurrent validity of cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill and on a cycle ergometer, and the influence of walking difficulties. Data were collected among fatigued MS patients from two different rehabilitation exercise labs with a different assessor, and slightly different equipment. We used a simple 2 min walk test; cardiopulmonary parameters (e.g. heart rate or oxygen consumption during walking) were not measured during the 2 min walk test. The use of a portable gas analyser and a heart rate monitor would have provided us data about the intensity of 2 minutes of fast walking in fatigued persons with MS (Gjellesvik, Brurok, Tjønna, Tørhaug, & Askim T, 2017; Morard, Besson, Laroche, Naaïm, Gremeaux, & Casillas, 2017).

Conclusion

Due to the poor correlation found between the 2 min walk test and VO2peak, the 2 min walk test cannot be recommended as a valid alternative for estimating aerobic capacity in patients with MS.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Funding

The TREFAMS-ACE Research Programme was financially supported by The Fonds NutsOhra (ZonMw 89000005).

Trial Registrations

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN69520623, and ISRCTN58583714.

Table 1

Final multiple regression model for predicting VO2peak (mL/kg/min)

Variable	Unstandardized B coefficient	Standard error	Change in R2	Partial R
Intercept	29.334	3.892
2 min walk test distance (m)	0.014	0.013	0.159	0.092
Gender (men)*	4.287	0.990	0.058	0.356
Age	–0.144	0.047	0.074	–0.263
EDSS	–1.284	0.453	0.042	–0.242

*Women as reference.