BACKGROUND: Provider perceptions about patient candidacy for kidney transplant (KT) are potentially significant contributors to disparities in KT. OBJECTIVE: To examine nephrologists' perceptions about factors that are important in excluding patients from KT referral, and to analyze the association between these perceptions and nephrologists' demographic and practice characteristics. Methods: Invitations were sent to 3180 nephrologists. Among those who consented, 822 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 250 were randomly invited to complete a questionnaire about perceptions of factors essential in deciding not to refer patients for KT. RESULTS: Responses from 216 participants with complete responses were analyzed. The 3 most common reasons for excluding patients were "patient's inadequate social support" (44%), "limited understanding of the process due to patient's inadequate education" (32%), and "patient's age above 65" (26%). Nephrologists practicing in rural settings were more likely to consider inadequate support and limited education of patients as reasons not to refer for KT. In multivariate analysis, physicians with 2 or fewer transplant centers within 50 miles were more likely to report inadequate social support (OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.59-6.24) and age greater than 65 years (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.01-3.49) as reasons to exclude patients from KT referral. Nephrologists whose practice included patients majority of whom had not completed high school were more likely to consider limited understanding due to inadequate education as an important reason to exclude patients from KT (OR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.60-6.86). CONCLUSION: Patient's social support, understanding, and age were the most common factors regarded by nephrologists as important in not referring patients for KT evaluation. Practice location, particularly rural setting, proximity to a transplant center, and the education level of a nephrologist's patient population were important determinants of referral for KT.
BACKGROUND: Provider perceptions about patient candidacy for kidney transplant (KT) are potentially significant contributors to disparities in KT. OBJECTIVE: To examine nephrologists' perceptions about factors that are important in excluding patients from KT referral, and to analyze the association between these perceptions and nephrologists' demographic and practice characteristics. Methods: Invitations were sent to 3180 nephrologists. Among those who consented, 822 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and 250 were randomly invited to complete a questionnaire about perceptions of factors essential in deciding not to refer patients for KT. RESULTS: Responses from 216 participants with complete responses were analyzed. The 3 most common reasons for excluding patients were "patient's inadequate social support" (44%), "limited understanding of the process due to patient's inadequate education" (32%), and "patient's age above 65" (26%). Nephrologists practicing in rural settings were more likely to consider inadequate support and limited education of patients as reasons not to refer for KT. In multivariate analysis, physicians with 2 or fewer transplant centers within 50 miles were more likely to report inadequate social support (OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.59-6.24) and age greater than 65 years (OR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.01-3.49) as reasons to exclude patients from KT referral. Nephrologists whose practice included patients majority of whom had not completed high school were more likely to consider limited understanding due to inadequate education as an important reason to exclude patients from KT (OR: 3.31, 95% CI: 1.60-6.86). CONCLUSION: Patient's social support, understanding, and age were the most common factors regarded by nephrologists as important in not referring patients for KT evaluation. Practice location, particularly rural setting, proximity to a transplant center, and the education level of a nephrologist's patient population were important determinants of referral for KT.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health status disparities; Kidney; Life support systems; Nephrologist; Perceptions; Referral and consultation; Transplant; Rural population; Urban population
Authors: Greg Knoll; Sandra Cockfield; Tom Blydt-Hansen; Dana Baran; Bryce Kiberd; David Landsberg; David Rush; Edward Cole Journal: CMAJ Date: 2005-11-08 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: David A Axelrod; Mary K Guidinger; Samuel Finlayson; Douglas E Schaubel; David C Goodman; Michael Chobanian; Robert M Merion Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-01-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Veronika Fabrizii; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Renate Klauser; Josef Kletzmayr; Markus D Säemann; Rudolf Steininger; Reinhard Kramar; Walter H Hörl; Josef Kovarik Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Nicole Jane Scholes-Robertson; Talia Gutman; Martin Howell; Jonathan Craig; Rachel Chalmers; Karen M Dwyer; Matthew Jose; Ieyesha Roberts; Allison Tong Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 2.692