Literature DB >> 18182602

Rates of solid-organ wait-listing, transplantation, and survival among residents of rural and urban areas.

David A Axelrod1, Mary K Guidinger, Samuel Finlayson, Douglas E Schaubel, David C Goodman, Michael Chobanian, Robert M Merion.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Disparities in access to organ transplantation exist for racial minorities, women, and patients with lower socioeconomic status or inadequate insurance. Rural residents represent another group that may have impaired access to transplant services.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of rural residence with waiting list registration for heart, liver, and kidney transplant and rates of transplantation among wait-listed candidates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Five-year US cohort of 174,630 patients who were wait-listed and who underwent heart, liver, or kidney transplantation between 1999 and 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of new waiting list registrations and transplants per million population for residents of 3 residential classifications (rural/small town population, <10,000; micropolitan, 10,000-50,000; and metropolitan >50,000 or suburb of major city).
RESULTS: Compared with urban residents, waiting list registration rates for rural/small town residents were significantly lower for heart (covariate-adjusted rate ratio [RR] = 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.96; P<.002), liver (RR = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.83-0.89; P<.001), and kidney transplants (RR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95; P<.001). Compared with residents in urban areas, rural/small town residents had lower relative transplant rates for heart (RR = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.81-0.94; P = .004), liver (RR = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77-0.84; P<.001), and kidney transplantation (covariate-adjusted RR = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.88-0.93; P<.001). These disparities were consistent across national organ allocation regions. Significantly longer waiting times among rural patients wait-listed for heart transplantation were observed but not for liver and kidney transplantation. There were no significant differences in posttransplantation outcomes between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients living in rural areas had a lower rate of wait-lisiting and transplant of solid organs, but did not experience significantly different outcomes following transplant. Differences in rates of wait-listing and transplant may be due to variations in the burden of disease between different patient groups or barriers to evaluation and waiting list entry for rural residents with organ failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18182602     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2007.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  70 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in kidney transplant outcomes: a review.

Authors:  Elisa J Gordon; Daniela P Ladner; Juan Carlos Caicedo; John Franklin
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.299

2.  The effect of race and income on living kidney donation in the United States.

Authors:  Jagbir Gill; James Dong; Caren Rose; Olwyn Johnston; David Landsberg; John Gill
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Same policy, different impact: Center-level effects of share 35 liver allocation.

Authors:  Douglas R Murken; Allison W Peng; David D Aufhauser; Peter L Abt; David S Goldberg; Matthew H Levine
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Inferior Access to Allogeneic Transplant in Disadvantaged Populations: A Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research Analysis.

Authors:  Kristjan Paulson; Ruta Brazauskas; Nandita Khera; Naya He; Navneet Majhail; Gorgun Akpek; Mahmoud Aljurf; David Buchbinder; Linda Burns; Sara Beattie; Cesar Freytes; Anne Garcia; James Gajewski; Theresa Hahn; Jennifer Knight; Charles LeMaistre; Hillard Lazarus; David Szwajcer; Matthew Seftel; Baldeep Wirk; William Wood; Wael Saber
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Liver resection and transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  J Belghiti; D Fuks
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  How important is social support in determining patients' suitability for transplantation? Results from a National Survey of Transplant Clinicians.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Joanna Emerson; Zeeshan Butt; Elisa J Gordon; Douglas W Hanto; Jennifer Perloff; Norman Daniels; Tara A Lavelle
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  What liver transplant outcomes can be expected in the uninsured who become insured via the Affordable Care Act?

Authors:  L N Glueckert; D Redden; M A Thompson; A Haque; S H Gray; J Locke; D E Eckhoff; M Fouad; D A DuBay
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Characteristics and Evaluation of Geographically Distant vs Geographically Nearby Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  F L Weng; D C Lee; N Dhillon; K N Tibaldi; L A Davis; A M Patel; R J Goldberg; M Morgievich; S Mulgaonkar
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

9.  Increase in mortality rate of liver transplant candidates residing in specific geographic areas: analysis of UNOS data.

Authors:  D Zorzi; C Rastellini; D H Freeman; G Elias; A Duchini; L Cicalese
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Are there geographical disparities in access to liver transplantation in Atlantic Canada?

Authors:  Paul Douglas Renfrew; Michele Molinari
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.