Jia Shao1, Yan Zheng Gao2, Kun Gao1, Zheng Hong Yu1. 1. Department of Spinal Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan, China. 2. Department of Spinal Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan, China. Electronic address: doctorgao63@126.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of screw-rod fixation and selective axial loosening in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (including reducible and irreducible) caused by os odontoideum (OO) via a single posterior approach. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients with OO surgically treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. For atlantoaxial instability and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation, C1-C2 screw-rod fixation and fusion were performed. OO combined with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation was reduced after posterior axial loosening, followed by screw-rod fixation and fusion. The general information, clinical data, and radiographic data were compared between the 2 different procedures. RESULTS: There were 41 patients with an average age of 40.6 ± 21.7 years. All the patients underwent posterior reduction and C1-2 screw rod fixation, 6 with axial loosening and 35 without axial loosening. The clinical manifestations and radiographic data significantly improved after the operation with a low rate of complications. Except for clivus-canal angle and visual analogue score of cervical pain, there were no differences in clinical and radiographic data between the 2 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior screws-rod fixation and selective axial loosening is appropriate for treating OO complicated with atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (including reducible and irreducible) without the need for anterior decompression.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of screw-rod fixation and selective axial loosening in the treatment of atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (including reducible and irreducible) caused by os odontoideum (OO) via a single posterior approach. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients with OO surgically treated in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. For atlantoaxial instability and reducible atlantoaxial dislocation, C1-C2 screw-rod fixation and fusion were performed. OO combined with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation was reduced after posterior axial loosening, followed by screw-rod fixation and fusion. The general information, clinical data, and radiographic data were compared between the 2 different procedures. RESULTS: There were 41 patients with an average age of 40.6 ± 21.7 years. All the patients underwent posterior reduction and C1-2 screw rod fixation, 6 with axial loosening and 35 without axial loosening. The clinical manifestations and radiographic data significantly improved after the operation with a low rate of complications. Except for clivus-canal angle and visual analogue score of cervical pain, there were no differences in clinical and radiographic data between the 2 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior screws-rod fixation and selective axial loosening is appropriate for treating OO complicated with atlantoaxial instability or dislocation (including reducible and irreducible) without the need for anterior decompression.