Literature DB >> 31493140

Brain structural connectomes indicate shared neural circuitry involved in subjective experience of cognitive and physical fatigue in older adults.

Timothy M Baran1,2, Zhengwu Zhang3, Andrew James Anderson4,5, Kelsey McDermott6, Feng Lin5,6,7,8,9.   

Abstract

Cumulative evidence suggests the existence of common processes underlying subjective experience of cognitive and physical fatigue. However, mechanistic understanding of the brain structural connections underlying the experience of fatigue in general, without the influence of clinical conditions, is limited. The purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between structural connectivity and perceived state fatigue in older adults. We enrolled cognitively and physically healthy older individuals (n = 52) and categorized them into three groups (low cognitive/low physical fatigue; low cognitive/high physical fatigue; high cognitive/low physical fatigue; no subjects had high cognitive/high physical fatigue) based on perceived fatigue from cognitive and physical fatigue manipulation tasks. Using sophisticated diffusion tensor imaging processing techniques, we extracted connectome matrices for six different characteristics of whole-brain structural connections for each subject. Tensor network principal component analysis was used to examine group differences in these connectome matrices, and extract principal brain networks for each group. Connected surface area of principal brain networks differentiated the two high fatigue groups from the low cognitive/physical fatigue group (high vs. low physical fatigue, p = 0.046; high vs. low cognitive fatigue, p = 0.036). Greater connected surface area within striatal-frontal-parietal networks was correlated with lower cognitive and physical fatigue, and was predictive of perceived physical and cognitive fatigue measures not used for group categorization (Pittsburgh fatigability physical subscale, R2 = 0.70, p < 0.0001; difference in self-report fatigue before and after gambling tasks, R2 = 0.54, p < 0.0001). There are potentially structural connectomes resilient to both cognitive and physical fatigue in older adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive fatigue; Connectome; Diffusion tensor imaging; Physical fatigue; Principal component analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 31493140      PMCID: PMC7058488          DOI: 10.1007/s11682-019-00201-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav        ISSN: 1931-7557            Impact factor:   3.978


  51 in total

1.  The relationship between diffusion tensor imaging and volumetry as measures of white matter properties.

Authors:  Anders M Fjell; Lars T Westlye; Doug N Greve; Bruce Fischl; Thomas Benner; André J W van der Kouwe; David Salat; Atle Bjørnerud; Paulina Due-Tønnessen; Kristine B Walhovd
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 2.  The Effects of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jeroen Van Cutsem; Samuele Marcora; Kevin De Pauw; Stephen Bailey; Romain Meeusen; Bart Roelands
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Altered basal ganglia functional connectivity in multiple sclerosis patients with fatigue.

Authors:  C Finke; J Schlichting; S Papazoglou; M Scheel; A Freing; C Soemmer; L M Pech; A Pajkert; C Pfüller; J T Wuerfel; C J Ploner; F Paul; A U Brandt
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 4.  Myelin Plasticity and Nervous System Function.

Authors:  Michelle Monje
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Restricted activity among community-living older persons: incidence, precipitants, and health care utilization.

Authors:  T M Gill; M M Desai; E A Gahbauer; T R Holford; C S Williams
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  The Pittsburgh Fatigability scale for older adults: development and validation.

Authors:  Nancy W Glynn; Adam J Santanasto; Eleanor M Simonsick; Robert M Boudreau; Scott R Beach; Richard Schulz; Anne B Newman
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Multiple Sclerosis Fatigue: A Longitudinal Structural MRI and Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study.

Authors:  K Yarraguntla; N Seraji-Bozorgzad; S Lichtman-Mikol; S Razmjou; F Bao; S Sriwastava; C Santiago-Martinez; O Khan; E Bernitsas
Journal:  J Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  The neural correlates of cognitive fatigue in traumatic brain injury using functional MRI.

Authors:  A D Kohl; G R Wylie; H M Genova; F G Hillary; J Deluca
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Fatigue in cystic fibrosis: a novel prospective study investigating subjective and objective factors associated with fatigue.

Authors:  N A Jarad; I M Sequeiros; P Patel; K Bristow; Z Sund
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.444

10.  Structural brain correlates of fatigue in older adults with and without Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Benzi M Kluger; Qing Zhao; Jared J Tanner; Nadine A Schwab; Shellie-Anne Levy; Sarah E Burke; Haiqing Huang; Mingzhou Ding; Catherine Price
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 4.881

View more
  3 in total

1.  Associations of White Matter and Basal Ganglia Microstructure to Cognitive Fatigue Rate in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Cristina A F Román; Glenn R Wylie; John DeLuca; Bing Yao
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Brain Small-Worldness Properties and Perceived Fatigue in Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Bennett Kukla; Mia Anthony; Shuyi Chen; Adam Turnbull; Timothy M Baran; Feng V Lin
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Visuospatial Function at Sub-Acute Phase Predicts Fatigue 10 Years After Stroke.

Authors:  Eva Elgh; Xiaolei Hu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.