Literature DB >> 31492814

Preserved capacity for learning statistical regularities and directing selective attention after hippocampal lesions.

Nuttida Rungratsameetaweemana1,2, Larry R Squire1,3,4,5,6, John T Serences1,5,6.   

Abstract

Prior knowledge about the probabilistic structure of visual environments is necessary to resolve ambiguous information about objects in the world. Expectations based on stimulus regularities exert a powerful influence on human perception and decision making by improving the efficiency of information processing. Another type of prior knowledge, termed top-down attention, can also improve perceptual performance by facilitating the selective processing of relevant over irrelevant information. While much is known about attention, the mechanisms that support expectations about statistical regularities are not well-understood. The hippocampus has been implicated as a key structure involved in or perhaps necessary for the learning of statistical regularities, consistent with its role in various kinds of learning and memory. Here, we tested this hypothesis using a motion discrimination task in which we manipulated the most likely direction of motion, the degree of attention afforded to the relevant stimulus, and the amount of available sensory evidence. We tested memory-impaired patients with bilateral damage to the hippocampus and compared their performance with controls. Despite a modest slowing in response initiation across all task conditions, patients performed similar to controls. Like controls, patients exhibited a tendency to respond faster and more accurately when the motion direction was more probable, the stimulus was better attended, and more sensory evidence was available. Together, these findings demonstrate a robust, hippocampus-independent capacity for learning statistical regularities in the sensory environment in order to improve information processing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expectation; hippocampus; memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31492814      PMCID: PMC6765262          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1904502116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  46 in total

1.  Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4.

Authors:  C J McAdams; J H Maunsell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Perceptual learning, awareness, and the hippocampus.

Authors:  J R Manns; L R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.899

Review 3.  Attentional modulation of visual processing.

Authors:  John H Reynolds; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Synergistic effect of combined temporal and spatial expectations on visual attention.

Authors:  Joanna R Doherty; Anling Rao; M Marsel Mesulam; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-07       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Eye movements support the link between conscious memory and medial temporal lobe function.

Authors:  Zhisen J Urgolites; Christine N Smith; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The necessity of the medial temporal lobe for statistical learning.

Authors:  Anna C Schapiro; Emma Gregory; Barbara Landau; Michael McCloskey; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Robust habit learning in the absence of awareness and independent of the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Peter J Bayley; Jennifer C Frascino; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Human amnesia and the medial temporal lobe illuminated by neuropsychological and neurohistological findings for patient E.P.

Authors:  Ricardo Insausti; Jacopo Annese; David G Amaral; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Quantifying medial temporal lobe damage in memory-impaired patients.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Gold; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Preserved learning and retention of pattern-analyzing skill in amnesia: dissociation of knowing how and knowing that.

Authors:  N J Cohen; L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  6 in total

1.  Sleep-Dependent Facilitation of Visual Perceptual Learning Is Consistent with a Learning-Dependent Model.

Authors:  Masako Tamaki; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Motor response vigour and visual fixation patterns reflect subjective valuation during intertemporal choice.

Authors:  Elke Smith; Jan Peters
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.779

Review 3.  Brain activity patterns underlying memory confidence.

Authors:  Syanah C Wynn; Erika Nyhus
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.698

4.  Associations between brain-derived neurotrophic factor and cognitive impairment in panic disorder.

Authors:  Wenchen Wang; Yuanyuan Liu; Shuqing Luo; Xiaoyun Guo; Xingguang Luo; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.708

5.  Increased Pupil Size during Future Thinking in a Subject with Retrograde Amnesia.

Authors:  Claire Boutoleau-Bretonnière; Estelle Lamy; Mohamad El Haj
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-15

Review 6.  A Process-Oriented View of Procedural Memory Can Help Better Understand Tourette's Syndrome.

Authors:  Bence Cs Farkas; Eszter Tóth-Fáber; Karolina Janacsek; Dezso Nemeth
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.