Literature DB >> 35022218

Sleep-Dependent Facilitation of Visual Perceptual Learning Is Consistent with a Learning-Dependent Model.

Masako Tamaki1,2,3, Yuka Sasaki4.   

Abstract

How sleep leads to offline performance gains in learning remains controversial. A use-dependent model assumes that sleep processing leading to performance gains occurs based on general cortical usage during wakefulness, whereas a learning-dependent model assumes that this processing is specific to learning. Here, we found evidence that supports a learning-dependent model in visual perceptual learning (VPL) in humans (both sexes). First, we measured the strength of spontaneous oscillations during sleep after two training conditions that required the same amount of training or visual cortical usage; one generated VPL (learning condition), while the other did not (interference condition). During a post-training nap, slow-wave activity (SWA) and sigma activity during non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep and theta activity during REM sleep were source localized to the early visual areas using retinotopic mapping. Inconsistent with a use-dependent model, only in the learning condition, sigma and theta activity, not SWA, increased in a trained region-specific manner and correlated with performance gains. Second, we investigated the roles of occipital sigma and theta activity during sleep. Occipital sigma activity during NREM sleep was significantly correlated with performance gains in presleep learning; however, occipital theta activity during REM sleep was correlated with presleep learning stabilization, shown as resilience to interference from postsleep learning in a trained region-specific manner. Occipital SWA was not associated with offline performance gains or stabilization. These results demonstrate that sleep processing leading to performance gains is learning dependent in VPL and involves occipital sigma and theta activity during sleep.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT The present study shows strong evidence that could help resolve the long-standing controversy surrounding sleep processing that strengthens learning (performance gains). There are two conflicting models. A use-dependent model assumes that sleep processing leading to performance gains occurs because of general cortical usage during wakefulness, whereas a learning-dependent model assumes that processing occurs specifically for learning. Using visual perceptual learning and interference paradigms, we found that processing did not take place after general cortical usage. Moreover, sigma activity during non-rapid eye movement (REM) sleep and theta activity during REM sleep in occipital areas were found to be involved in processing, which is consistent with the learning-dependent model and not the use-dependent model. These results support the learning-dependent model.
Copyright © 2022 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  homeostasis; interference; learning-dependent model; neuroimaging; sleep; visual perceptual learning

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35022218      PMCID: PMC8896551          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0982-21.2021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.709


  84 in total

1.  Acquiring simultaneous EEG and functional MRI.

Authors:  R I Goldman; J M Stern; J Engel; M S Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Where practice makes perfect in texture discrimination: evidence for primary visual cortex plasticity.

Authors:  A Karni; D Sagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

5.  Consolidation of complex motor skill learning: evidence for a delayed offline process.

Authors:  Diva Lugassy; Jasmine Herszage; Raphael Pilo; Tamar Brosh; Nitzan Censor
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.849

6.  Quantification of sleepiness: a new approach.

Authors:  E Hoddes; V Zarcone; H Smythe; R Phillips; W C Dement
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  The time course of learning a visual skill.

Authors:  A Karni; D Sagi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Slow-wave sleep: do young adult men and women age differently?

Authors:  C L Ehlers; D J Kupfer
Journal:  J Sleep Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.981

9.  Overlearning hyperstabilizes a skill by rapidly making neurochemical processing inhibitory-dominant.

Authors:  Kazuhisa Shibata; Yuka Sasaki; Ji Won Bang; Edward G Walsh; Maro G Machizawa; Masako Tamaki; Li-Hung Chang; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Complementary contributions of non-REM and REM sleep to visual learning.

Authors:  Masako Tamaki; Zhiyan Wang; Tyler Barnes-Diana; DeeAnn Guo; Aaron V Berard; Edward Walsh; Takeo Watanabe; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  1 in total

1.  Visual Plasticity in Adulthood: Perspectives from Hebbian and Homeostatic Plasticity.

Authors:  Ji Won Bang; Giles Hamilton-Fletcher; Kevin C Chan
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 7.235

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.