Literature DB >> 31492674

Understanding diagnostic disagreement in angle closure assessment between anterior segment optical coherence tomography and gonioscopy.

Natalia Porporato1, Mani Baskaran1, Tin A Tun1, Rehena Sultana2, Marcus Tan3, Joanne HuiMin Quah4, John C Allen2, Shamira Perera1, David S Friedman5, Ching Yu Cheng1, Tin Aung6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although being a more objective tool for assessment and follow-up of angle closure, reliability studies have reported a moderate diagnostic performance for anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) technologies when comparing with gonioscopy as the reference standard. We aim to determine factors associated with diagnostic disagreement in angle closure when assessed by anterior segment swept source OCT (SS-OCT, CASIA SS-1000; Tomey, Nagoya, Japan) and gonioscopy.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study. A total of 2027 phakic subjects aged ≥50 years, with no relevant previous ophthalmic history, were consecutively recruited from a community polyclinic in Singapore. Gonioscopy and SS-OCT (128 radial scans) for the entire circumference of the angle were performed for each subject. A two-quadrant closed gonioscopic definition was used. On SS-OCT images, angle closure was defined as iridotrabecular contact (ITC) to the extent of ≥35%, ≥50% and ≥75% of the circumferential angle. Diagnostic disagreements between both methods, that is, false positives or overcalls and false negatives or undercalls were defined, respectively, as gonioscopic open/closed angles inversely assessed as closed/open by SS-OCT.
RESULTS: Two hundred and seventy-two (14.7%) resulted in overcall results (false positives) when ≥50% of the angle circumference was closed using SS-OCT. These eyes had significantly wider (anterior chamber width, 11.7 vs 11.6 mm, p<0.001) and deeper (anterior chamber depth (ACD), 2.4 vs 2.2 mm, p<0.001) anterior chambers than eyes assessed by both methods as closed (true positives). Deeper ACD (OR 9.31) and lower lens vault (LV) (OR 0.04) were significantly associated with a false positive diagnosis in the multivariate analysis. Most of these cases had short (52.6%) or irregular (39%) ITC in SS-OCT images.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that anterior chamber dimensions, determined by ACD and LV, were factors significantly associated with diagnostic disagreement between anterior segment SS-OCT and gonioscopy in angle closure assessment. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  angle; anterior chamber; glaucoma; imaging

Year:  2019        PMID: 31492674     DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  Intraobserver and interobserver agreement among anterior chamber angle evaluations using automated 360-degree gonio-photos.

Authors:  Masato Matsuo; Shiro Mizoue; Koji Nitta; Yasuyuki Takai; Kazunobu Sugihara; Masaki Tanito
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Anterior segment biometric measurements explain misclassifications by a deep learning classifier for detecting gonioscopic angle closure.

Authors:  Alice Shen; Michael Chiang; Anmol A Pardeshi; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Benjamin Y Xu
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Non-contact tests for identifying people at risk of primary angle closure glaucoma.

Authors:  Anish Jindal; Irene Ctori; Gianni Virgili; Ersilia Lucenteforte; John G Lawrenson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-05-28

4.  Changes in ocular morphology after cataract surgery in open angle glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Giedre Pakuliene; Loreta Kuzmiene; Brent Siesky; Alon Harris; Ingrida Januleviciene
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Anatomic Changes and Predictors of Angle Widening after Laser Peripheral Iridotomy: The Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Xu; David S Friedman; Paul J Foster; Yu Jiang; Anmol A Pardeshi; Yuzhen Jiang; Beatriz Munoz; Tin Aung; Mingguang He
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 14.277

6.  Optimal number and orientation of anterior segment OCT images to measure ocular biometric parameters in angle closure eyes: the Chinese American Eye Study.

Authors:  Jing Shan; Anmol Pardeshi; Xuejuan Jiang; Grace M Richter; Roberta McKean-Cowdin; Rohit Varma; Benjamin Y Xu
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 5.908

Review 7.  Anterior Chamber Angle Assessment Techniques: A Review.

Authors:  Ivano Riva; Eleonora Micheletti; Francesco Oddone; Carlo Bruttini; Silvia Montescani; Giovanni De Angelis; Luigi Rovati; Robert N Weinreb; Luciano Quaranta
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Anterior Segment OCT in Primary Angle Closure Disease Compared With Normal Subjects With Similar Shallow Anterior Chamber.

Authors:  Qinghong Xie; Ping Ma; Jutima Patlidanon; Murtaza Saifee; Sean Yonamine; Yinxi Yu; Gui-Shuang Ying; Yangfan Yang; Shuning Li; Ying Han
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.