| Literature DB >> 31491837 |
Alexa Haeger1, Ana S Costa1, Jörg B Schulz1, Kathrin Reetz2.
Abstract
Current treatment in late-life cognitive impairment and dementia is still limited, and there is no cure for brain tissue degeneration or reversal of cognitive decline. Physical activity represents a promising non-pharmacological interventional approach in many diseases causing cognitive impairment, but its effect on brain integrity is still largely unknown. Especially research of cerebral alterations in disease state that goes beyond observations of clinical improvement is crucial to understand disease processes and possible effective treatments. In this systematic review, we address the question how physical activity and fitness in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) influences brain architecture compared to cognitively healthy elderly. We review both interventional studies comprising aerobic, coordinative and resistance exercises and observational studies on fitness and physical activity combined with Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI). Different MRI approaches were included such as volumetric and structural analyses, Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), functional MRI and Cerebral Blood Flow (CBF). We evaluate MRI results for different exercise modalities and performed a methodological evaluation of interventional studies in cognitive decline compared to normal aging. According to our results, among 12 interventions in AD/MCI, aerobic exercise is most frequently applied (9 studies). Interventions in AD/MCI altogether reveal a higher methodological quality compared to interventions in healthy elderly (8.33 ± 2.19 vs. 6.25 ± 2.36 out of 13 points), with most frequent missing aspects related to descriptions of complications, lack of intention-to-treat and statistical power analyses. Effects of aerobic exercise and fitness seem to mainly impact brain structures sensitive to neurodegeneration, which especially comprise frontal, temporal and parietal regions, such as the hippocampal/parahippocampal region, precuneus, anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex, which are reported by several studies. General fitness measured via an objective fitness assessment and questionnaires seems to have a more global cerebral effect, probably due to its long-term application, whereas distinct intervention effects of durations between 3 and 6 months seem to concentrate on more local brain regions as the hippocampus, which can also be influenced by region of interest analyses. There is still a lack of evidence on other or combined types of intervention modalities, such as resistance, coordinative as well as multicomponent exercise during cognitive decline, and complex interventions as dancing. Future research should examine their beneficial effect on brain integrity, since several non-MRI studies already point to their advantageous impact. As a further future prospect, combination and application of newly developed imaging methods such as metabolic imaging should be envisaged to understand physical activity and its cerebral influence under its many-sided facets.Entities:
Keywords: Dementia; Exercise; Fitness; MRI; Neuroimaging; Physical activity
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31491837 PMCID: PMC6699421 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101933
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1Flow chart of the inclusion process of literature according to the PRISMA criteria. A total of 23 studies is included in this review.
Criteria for evaluation of studies methodological quality (Pitkälä et al., 2013). The criteria selection were drawn from several sources (Forbes et al., 2008; Guyatt et al., 1993, Guyatt et al., 1994; Liu and Latham, 2009; Maher et al., 2003) as described in Pitkälä et al. Each criterion was evaluated with one point.
Adequate and acceptable description of randomization method (computerized randomization program, a separate randomization center) |
Sufficient definition of study population (for diagnosis of dementia: |
Accurate description of inclusion and exclusion criteria |
Sufficient statistical power to detect differences between changes in groups. Statistical power analyses or adequate number of participants |
Clear definition and validation of outcome measures |
Comparable groups at baseline or adjustment of outcome measures as needed |
Description of drop-outs ( |
Analyses on an intention-to-treat basis |
Comparison in relation to changes in outcome variables between the groups |
Blinding to group assignment when assessing the outcomes |
Description of intervention in sufficient detail to be repeated |
Description of compliance of participants |
Reporting of complications |
Overview of intervention studies in cognitive impairment.
| Study | Description of sample | Intervention/Content | Results | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Included sample size | Mean age in years (SD) | Description | Duration in weeks | Frequency per week | Session duration (min) | Outcome measures MRI and cognition | Main MRI Results | Cognitive results | Follow- up | Methodological quality | |
| 11 SCI | 74.0 (2.5) | I: AT (mainly walking); C: stretching | 16 | 4 | Total of 150 min/week | Postinterventional structural MRI, ASL, Resting state | I: Increase of hippocampal CBF | Not performed | N | 7 | |
| 35 (17 MCI, 18 HC), 34 with MRI | MCI 78.7 (7.5), HC (76.0 (7.3) | Supervised treadmill walking of moderate intensity | 12 | Gradual increase to 4 sessions | 30 | fMRI Famous Name Discrimination Task | Decrease in semantic memory retrieval-related activation | Improved Learning on the AVLT in MCI and HC | N | 8 | |
| 22 MCI, 13 in intervention, 9 in control condition; 20 with MRI | 70 (7.2) in intervention | I: Omega-3 FA, aerobic exercise, cognitive stimulation; C: Omega-3 FA, stretching and toning | 24 | 2 | 45 | MRI | I: Increase in GM volume in middle frontal cortex, frontal pole, angular cortex, pre-cuneus, post. Cingulate cortex | No effect on cognitive results | N | 7 | |
| 30 (14 MCI, 16 HC) | MCI 78.85 (7.75), HC: 75.87 (6.90) | Supervised treadmill walking of moderate intensity | 12 | Gradual increase to 4 sessions | 30 | CT | Association between larger fitness and changes of CT in bilat. Insula, precentr. Gyri, precuneus, post. Cingulate, inf. + sup. Frontal cortices and temporal gyrus in MCI | See | N | 8 | |
| 86 MCI (all F) | AT 76.07 (3.43), RT 73.75(3.72), BAT 75.46 (3.93) | AT, RT, BAT | 24 | 2 | 60 | MRI | AT: increased hippoc. Volume | Association between increased left hippoc. Volume and reduced verbal memory | N | 11 | |
| 68 with probable AD | 72.9 (7.7) | Supervised moderate AT | 24 | 3–5 | Total of 150 min/week | Hippocampal and total GM volume | Association of change in cardiorespiratory fitness with bilateral hippoc. Volume | Association of change in cardioresp. Fitness with change in memory | N | 12 | |
| 32 (16 MCI, 16 HC) | MCI 79.6 (6.8), HC 76.1 (7.2) | Supervised treadmill walking of moderate intensity | 12 | Gradual increase to 4 sessions | 30 | Resting state | Increased functional connectivity of PCC/precuneus; Postcentral gyrus with decreased connectivity in HC | See | N | 7 | |
| 14 MCI for 6 months analysis (46 in 3 months analysis) | 78.1 (9.9) | I: virtual reality bike rides | 24 | Gradual increase from 2 to at least 3–5 sessions | 45 | GM volume | Association between greater exercise dose and increasing PFC and ACC; Inverse correlation between verbal memory errors and DLPFC volume | I: Improvement in immediate verbal memory, self-report of everyday cognitive function + physical ability | N | 7 | |
| 41 (mild to moderate AD) | I: 67.8 (7.7); C: 69.8 (7.7) | I: Aerobic exercise of moderate-to-high intensity | 16 | 3 | 60 | Regional Volume | Positive correlation of exercise load with hippocampal volume change and frontal CT | Association between volume changes in frontal CT and mental speed + attention | N | 8 | |
| 77 with MCI (RT = 26, AT = 24, BAT = 27); 22 with MRI | 74.9 (3.5) | RT, AT, BAT | 24 | 2 | 60 | fMRI during associative memory | Functional changes in RT group in right lingual, occipital-fusiform gyri, right frontal pole during encoding and recall of associations | Improvement of RT group during Stroop and associative memory test | N | 5 | |
| 86 MCI (79 with MRI) | 70.1 (6.7) | PRT + CCT; PRT + CCC; CCT+ stretching; stretching + CCC | 26 | 2 | 90 | CT | Increase in CT of PC in all PRT groups | Reduced decline of overall memory performance in CCT, but not PRT; Improvement on ADAS-Cog in PRT groups | Y | 8 | |
| 100 (50 amnestic MCI, 50 other MCI) | I: 74.8 (7.4) C: 75.8 (6.1) | I: Multicomponent exercise; C: education control group | 24 | 2 | 90 | VSRAD | Reduced whole brain atrophy in MCI | I: Improvement of MMSE and WMS-LM in aMCI | N | 12 | |
Abbreviations: ACC = Anterior Cingulate Cortex, AD = Alzheimer’s Disease, ADAS-Cog = Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive Subscale, aMCI = amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, ASL = Arterial Spin Labelling, AT = Aerobic Training, AVLT = Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, BAT = Balance and Tone Training, BDNF = Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, C = Control condition, CBF = Cerebral Blood Flow, CCC = Cognitive Control Condition, CCT = Computerized Cognitive Training, CT = Cortical Thickness, DLPFC = Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, GM = Gray Matter, HC = Healthy Controls, I = Intervention, IGF-1 = Insulin-Like-Growth Factor, IL-6 = Interleukin 6, MCI = Mild Cognitive Impairment, MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination, N = No; Omega-3-FA = Omega-3-Fatacids, PA = Physical activity, PC = Posterior cingulate, PCC = Posterior Cingulate Cortex, PFC = Prefrontal Cortex, PRT = Progressive Resistance Training, RT = Resistance Training, SCI = Subjective Cognitive Impairment, SD = Standard Deviation, SNP = Single Nucleotide Polymorphism, VEGF = Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor, VSRAD = voxel-based specific regional analysis system for Alzheimer's disease, WM = white matter, WMS-LM = Wechsler Memory Scale – Logical Memory, Y = Yes.
Overview of observational studies evaluating physical activity via fitness assessment or questionnaires in cognitive impairment.
| Study | Description of sample | Content | Results | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Included sample size; gender (F/M) | Mean age in years (SD) | Description | Outcome measures MRI and cognition | Main MRI results | Cognitive results | |
| 121 (64 HC, 57 early AD) | 73.5 | pVO2 | Whole brain volume, WM, GM | Association of fitness with whole brain, gray and white matter volume in AD; | In AD association between pVO2 and performance on Logical Memory II, Trail Making B and Digit symbol test | |
| 117 (56 HC, 61 early AD) | 73.8 (6.3) | pVO2 | VBM analysis, whole brain volume | Association between fitness and WM in bilateral inferior parietal cortex, and after SVC in hippocampus/parahippocampus in AD | – | |
| 18 aMCI (9 high PA, 9 low PA) | Low PA: 73.6 (8.3); High PA 75.0 (5.5) | High PA and Low PA group according to SBAS | 3 T fMRI with semantic memory task | Increased activation in left caudate in High-PA aMCI | No difference in neuropsychological or discrimination performance | |
| 90 (37 early AD, 53 HC) | HC 73.2 (6.7), AD 73.8 (5.8) | pVO2 over 2 years | VBM | Association between fitness and atrophy mainly in left parahippocampus in AD | Association between fitness and increased progression of dementia severity | |
| 34 (18 HC, 16 early AD) | HC 72.2 (7.2), AD 74.9 (7.4) | pVO2 | fMRI Stroop task | Association between fitness and increased activation in ACC only in HC | – | |
| 82 (43 HC; 39 ADCE) | Controls 79.3 (4.8) AD 81.9 (5.1) | MLTPA | Whole brain volume at year 9 | Association between PA and total brain volume after 9 years | Association between lower PA and risk of AD | |
| 37 ADCE | 72.35 (7.9) | pVO2 in cardio-pulm. Exercise test | DTI | Association between fitness and increased white matter integrity in right IFOF | No sign. Results on UDS | |
| 876 (213 MCI or AD) | 78.3 (3.9) | MLTPA | VBM | Association between caloric expenditure and precuneus, posterior cingulate, vermis in MCI/AD | Not reported | |
| 22 aMCI | 68.5 (5.3) | pVO2 | VBM, DTI | Correlation of aerobic fitness with gray matter in frontal and parietal areas | Not reported | |
| 81 (26 HC, 55 aMCI) | 65 (7) | VO2max | DTI | Positive correlation of fitness with FA + negative correlation with MD, RD in multiple tracts | Association between DTI results and executive performance in MCI | |
| 310 MCI | 71.3 (4.4) | Triaxial accelerometer for 2 weeks | MRI | Association between moderate PA and hippocampal volume | No association between PA and memory performance | |
Abbreviations: ACC = Anterior Cingulate Cortex, AD = Alzheimer’s Disease, aMCI = amnestic mild cognitive impairment, AxD = axial diffusivity, CSF = Cerebrospinal Fluid, DTI = Diffusion-Tensor Imaging, FA = Fractional Anisotropy, DTI = Diffusion-tensor-imaging, GM = Gray Matter, HC = Healthy Controls, IFOF = inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, MCI = Mild Cognitive Impairment, MD = Mean diffusivity, MLTPA = Minnesota Leisure Time Physical Activity questionnaire, PA = Physical Activity, PASE = Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, PPT = Physical performance test, RD = Radial diffusivity, SBAS = Stanford Brief Activity Survey, SVC = Small Volume Correction, TNFα = Tumor Necrosis Factor, UDS = uniform data set, VBM = voxel-based-morphometry, WM = White Matter.
Fig. 2Overview of included studies in MCI and AD patients with number of included subjects who underwent MRI.
Evaluation of quality criteria in intervention studies among people with cognitive impairment (A) and cognitively healthy elderly (B) in descending order of total scoring: + = fulfills criteria; − = does not fulfill criteria; ± = fulfills criteria only partly; ? = cannot be concluded from the study report.
| Study | Randomization described and acceptable | Valid definition of diagnosis | Inclusion and exclusion criteria described | Adequate statistical power described with power analyses | Valid measurements and outcome measures | Baseline characteristics in groups described and groups comparable | Drop-out described and included in analysis | Intention to treat analysis | Comparison of differences in changes between the groups in outcome variables | Blinding used | Description of intervention | Compliance described | Complications described | Total score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A) | ||||||||||||||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | 12 | |
| + | + | + | + | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + | + | 12 | |
| + | − | + | + | + | + | ± | + | + | + | + | + | + | 11 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | + | ± | − | + | + | + | + | − | 8 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | 8 | |
| + | + | + | − | + | + | ± | − | + | + | + | − | − | 8 | |
| + | + | − | + | + | − | ± | + | + | + | + | − | − | 8 | |
| − | − | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | 7 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | + | ± | − | + | − | + | + | − | 7 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | ± | + | − | 7 | |
| ± | − | + | ± | + | + | ± | − | + | ? | + | + | + | 7 | |
| ± | − | − | − | + | + | ± | − | + | + | ± | + | − | 5 | |
| B) | ||||||||||||||
| + | + | + | + | + | + | ? | + | + | + | + | + | + | 12 | |
| + | + | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | − | 9 | |
| − | ± | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − | 9 | |
| + | + | + | ± | + | + | ? | − | + | + | + | − | + | 9 | |
| ± | + | + | + | + | + | ± | − | + | + | + | + | − | 9 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | + | + | ? | + | ? | + | + | − | 8 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | ± | + | − | − | 6 | |
| − | + | ± | − | + | + | + | − | + | ? | + | − | − | 6 | |
| − | + | + | ± | + | + | ± | − | + | ? | + | ± | − | 6 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | − | + | − | − | 6 | |
| + | ± | ± | − | + | + | − | − | + | ? | + | − | − | 5 | |
| − | ± | + | ± | + | + | − | − | + | ? | + | ± | − | 5 | |
| − | + | ± | − | + | ± | − | − | + | ? | + | + | − | 5 | |
| − | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | ? | + | − | − | 5 | |
| − | + | + | ± | + | ± | ± | − | + | ? | + | − | − | 5 | |
| − | + | + | − | ± | + | − | − | + | ? | + | − | − | 5 | |
| ± | ± | ± | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | ± | + | − | 5 | |
| − | + | ± | − | + | ± | − | − | + | ? | + | − | − | 4 | |
| − | + | ± | ± | + | + | ± | − | + | ? | ± | − | − | 4 | |
| − | ± | ± | − | + | ± | − | − | + | ? | ± | − | − | 2 | |
Fig. 3Overview of brain regions affected by intervention studies (A), fitness (B) and physical activity evaluated via questionnaires (C) for MCI/AD patients (blue) and cognitively healthy elderly (red). The color grading (overlay transparency) is shown for a single study for reported brain regions. Therefore, an accumulation resulting in increased color grading will occur when certain ROIs are reported by several studies. For intervention studies (A), relevance of brain regions is weighted by methodological quality (0 to 100% of criteria fulfilled). For observational studies (B and C) total sample size is taken for weighting (categorization into samples of <50 subjects, 50–100, 100–200, 200–500, >500 subjects). For comparison purposes, only results from volume and cortical thickness analyses were included. On the right, corresponding illustration of brain regions reported for intervention and observational studies in relation to sample size and reported number of brain regions belonging to superordinate brain regions is given. These are illustrated via circle size (1–5 reported sub-regions). Overview of the names of the brain regions included in this graphical illustration in detail are listed in the supplementary (volume and cortical thickness). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)