Literature DB >> 31490990

Microarray based genetic profiling of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from abattoir byproducts of pork origin.

Marina Morach1, Nadine Käppeli1, Mirjam Hochreutener1, Sophia Johler1, Jérôme Julmi1, Roger Stephan1, Danai Etter1,2.   

Abstract

Many parts of pork meat processing are currently not used for human consumption in Switzerland, although they are of great nutritional value. Therefore, data on the occurrence of pathogenic organisms on byproducts is extremely scarce and the prevalence and population structure of Staphylococcus aureus on meat processing sidestreams is unknown. Hence, abattoir byproducts of pork origin including ear, forefoot, heart, intestine, liver, rib bone, sternum, bladder, stomach, hind foot and tongue originating from six abattoirs were screened for S. aureus. The obtained isolates were investigated by spa typing and DNA microarray analysis to reveal their genomic profile and population structure. The prevalence of S. aureus was generally low with a mean of 8%. In total, 40 S. aureus strains were detected and assigned to 12 spa types (t015, t1491, t1778, t091, t337, t899, t2922, t7439, t1333, t208, t4049, t034) and seven clonal complexes (CC1, CC7, CC9, CC30, CC45, CC49, CC398). Detected enterotoxin genes included sea, seb, sec, seh, sel and egc encoded toxin genes seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, and seu. None of the isolates harbored genes conferring methicillin resistance, but blaZ/I/R genes causing penicillin resistance were frequently found. In addition, strains from CC398 exhibited tetM and tetK, conferring tetracycline resistance. Similarity calculations based on microarray profiles revealed no association of clonal complexes with particular body parts, but revealed a certain correspondence of clonal complex and originating abattoir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31490990      PMCID: PMC6730867          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Roughly 23 million tons of pork meat are processed in the European Union annually with a rising tendency [1]. A significant proportion of this meat is wasted during processing [2] either due to shortcomings in the handling of sidestreams or due to low consumer acceptance and therefore limited marketability of products. In other parts of the world, especially various Asian regions (e.g. Philippines, China, Korea), pig ear or pig tongue and other byproducts are considered a delicacy of great value (e.g. dishes like Panlasang Pinoy and Jokbal). Also, in Europe, the movement of “nose to tail” eating [3] has gained recognition in gastronomy and among the general public in recent years [4]. It aims at utilizing all parts of an animal, giving special attention to the culinary potential of offal. Currently, information on the safety of such products is limited [5,6], and information on the occurrence of Staphylococcus aureus is missing. S. aureus is a common skin colonizing organism responsible for staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP). In 2015, EFSA reported 434 food-borne outbreaks due to staphylococcal enterotoxins (SE). Of these, 85 outbreaks were associated with meat or meat products [7]. Generally, pork meat production has raised concern due to the transmission of livestock associated- methicillin-resistant S. aureus (LA-MRSA) from animals to humans [8,9]. The most prevalent MRSA lineage in Europe is CC398, while in Asia CC9 is more frequent [9]. The genetic profiles of S. aureus isolated from neck, belly, back, and ham of pig carcasses in Switzerland have been reported [10], but little is known about the occurrence of S. aureus on slaughtering byproducts. In this study, ear, forefoot, heart, intestine, liver, rib bone, sternum, bladder, stomach, hind foot and tongue of porcine origin were screened for S. aureus and the detected isolates were further characterized. In order to unravel the genomic population structure of S. aureus isolates, spa typing and DNA microarray analysis were used. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of S. aureus found on abattoir byproducts of pork origin and to characterize their virulence gene and antibiotic susceptibility profiles.

Materials and methods

Sampling, bacterial isolation and DNA extraction

Overall, 524 samples of abattoir byproducts of pork origin such as ear (n = 42), forefoot (n = 56), hind foot (n = 56), heart (n = 42), intestine (n = 20), liver (n = 42), rib bone (n = 56), sternum (n = 56), bladder (n = 56), stomach (n = 56) and tongue (n = 42) from six abattoirs (56–112 samples from each) were screened for S. aureus. An aliquot of 10 g of the respective sample was homogenized (Stomacher 80 Biomaster, Seward, West Sussex, United Kingdom) with 90 g NaCl (0.9%) solution (Oxoid, Pratteln, Switzerland). An aliquot of 100 μl each was plated on rabbit plasma fibrinogen agar (Oxoid) and incubated for 48 h at 37°C. The resulting detection limit was 100 CFU/g. For cell lysis, lysostaphin from the Staphytype genotyping kit 2.0 (Alere Technologies GmbH, Jena, Germany) was used before DNA was extracted with the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Hilden, Germany) as described in the manufacturer’s instructions.

DNA microarray analysis

DNA microarray was performed using Staphytype genotyping kit 2.0 (Alere) following the manufacturer's instructions. An ArrayMate reader (Alere) was used for signal acquisition. In addition, the similarity of the virulence and resistance gene profiles was visualized using SplitsTree4 (http://www.splitstree.org/ [11]) as previously described [12].

spa typing

The sequence of the polymorphic X region of the spa gene of each S. aureus isolate was determined as described previously [13] with minor modifications. In short, the spa gene was amplified using the GoTaq PCR system (Promega AG, Dübendorf, Switzerland) at the following reaction conditions: i) 5 min at 94°C; ii) 29x [45 s at 94°C; 45 s at 60°C; 90 s at 72°C]; iii) 10 min at 72°C. Sequencing was outsourced to Microsynth (Balgach, Switzerland) and sequences were assigned to spa types using the spa-server (http://www.spaserver.ridom.de/; [14]) as previously described by [12].

Results and discussion

S. aureus prevalence in abattoir byproducts

Overall, 40 (8%) of the 524 sampled byproducts were positive (> 100 cfu/g) for S. aureus. Colonization of products ranged from 100 to 1800 CFU/g, with a mean of 360 CFU/g and a standard deviation of 479 CFU/g. Products, for which no S. aureus were detected, include hind foot, stomach, and bladder (Table 1). Parts with the highest prevalence were tongue (29%) and ear (24%), followed by rib bone (13%), sternum (9%), heart (7%) forefoot (2%) and liver (2%). The prevalence was lower than in other studies examining pork carcasses in Europe [15-17] or Asia [18]. S. aureus was found in only four of the six sampled abattoirs (Fig 1).
Table 1

Prevalence of S. aureus on sampled byproducts.

OrganPositive samplesa/total samplesPrevalence [%]
Sternum5/569
Rib bone7/5613
Hind foot0/560
Forefoot1/562
Intestine1/205
Heart3/427
Liver1/422
Stomach0/560
Ear10/4224
Bladder0/560
Tongue12/4229
Total40/5248

a>100 CFU/g

Fig 1

Splitstree showing the similarity of microarray hybridization profiles between the investigated S. aureus isolates.

The corresponding clonal complexes are grouped by an arc. The source of isolation is labelled with following symbols: ear (▲), sternum (■), tongue (●), heart (♥), liver (□), rib bone (◆), forefoot (▼), intestine (◯). Each symbol represents a single isolate. The underlying colour indicates the source abattoir: Abattoir A (blue), Abattoir B (red), Abattoir C (yellow) and abattoir D (green). * No CC was assigned by the microarray. Isolates of spa type t015 assigned to CC45 have been previously reported [12,19,20].

Splitstree showing the similarity of microarray hybridization profiles between the investigated S. aureus isolates.

The corresponding clonal complexes are grouped by an arc. The source of isolation is labelled with following symbols: ear (▲), sternum (■), tongue (●), heart (♥), liver (□), rib bone (◆), forefoot (▼), intestine (◯). Each symbol represents a single isolate. The underlying colour indicates the source abattoir: Abattoir A (blue), Abattoir B (red), Abattoir C (yellow) and abattoir D (green). * No CC was assigned by the microarray. Isolates of spa type t015 assigned to CC45 have been previously reported [12,19,20]. a>100 CFU/g

Clonal complex and spa type

Of the 40 isolates obtained from pork byproducts, 39 could be assigned to a total of six clonal complexes (CC). Twelve spa types were associated with the samples (Table 2). The most frequent spa types were t091 (n = 9), t1491 (n = 8), t899 (n = 6) and t034 (n = 5). Other types that were represented to a lesser extent were t337 (n = 3), t208 (n = 2), t4049 (n = 2), t015 (n = 1), t1778 (n = 1), t1333 (n = 1), t2922 (n = 1) and t7439 (n = 1). The most prevalent CCs were CC9 (27.5%), CC1 (22.5%) and CC7 (22.5%). All other strains belonged to either CC398 (12.5%), CC49 (10%) or CC30 (2.5%), whereas one sample (t015 (2.5%)) could not be assigned to a CC by microarray analysis. Previous studies have assigned t015 strains to CC45 [12,19,20]. Johler et al. (2011) reported occurrence of CC9 (58.9%), CC49 (2.5%) and CC398 (28.2%) on pig carcasses in Switzerland. Similar prevalence was reported for porcine isolates from Denmark with CC398 (39%), CC30 (29%) and CC9 (27%) [21]. Strains belonging to CC9, CC30, CC49 and CC398 were found in slaughterhouses in Latvia [17] and in pigs and pig farmers in Switzerland [22]. CC1 has been associated with human infection [23] as well as pig farming [24]. An Italian study discovered overlapping of isolates found in abattoir workers and pork meat isolates, mainly for CC1 and CC398 [25]. CC7(t091) has regularly been linked to human infections [26,27] but appearance on pork meat has been observed as well [28-30] and the spa type has been linked with outbreaks in China [31]. In Europe CC1 (t1491) has been linked to human infections [32] or nasal colonization [33,34] and was found on pigs [21,28]. CC9 (t899) had already been identified in slaughtering pigs in Switzerland [35]. For CC45(t015), frequent occurrence as a human nasal colonizer has been reported [12,36], possibly linking this strain to processing contamination in the present study, as it was isolated from a heart and has only rarely been linked with pork [28]. An attribution of CCs to the respective source of isolation (body part) showed no difference between CCs present at outer body parts and those on inner organs (Fig 1). It could be hypothesized that inner organs were contaminated during meat processing. This is supported by the fact that not all CCs were found in all abattoirs. CC49 and CC45 were exclusively found in abattoir B, CC30 only in abattoir C. Other complexes appeared in two or more abattoirs, but none were present in all four abattoirs (Fig 1).
Table 2

Characteristics of 40 S. aureus isolates obtained from pork abattoir byproducts.

Clonal complexspa typeNr. of isolatesResistance genesaEnterotoxin genesaCapsule typeaComments a
CCbt0151blaZ/I/RND8spa-negative on microarray
CC1t14918blaZ/I/R (7)seac (2), seb (3), sec (1), seh (3), sel (1), egcd (2)8
t17781qacCsead8
CC7t0919aacA-aphD (1)sead (2), seh (1), egc (5)8
CC9t3373blaZ/I/R, fosBseb (1), seh (1), egc (1)5fnbA-negative (1)
t8996blaZ/I/R (1), fosBseb (2), seh (2), egc (2)5
t29221blaZ/I/R, fosBegc5
t74391blaZ/I/R, fosBND5
CC30t13331fosBseb, seh8
CC49t2082blaZ/I/Rsead (1)5
t40492blaZ/I/Rsead (1), egc (1)5
CC398t0345blaZ/I/R (2), vgaA (2), tetK (1), tetMsead (2), seb (1), seh (1), egc (1)5

a If not all isolates assigned to the respective spa type harbored a gene, the number of positive isolates is indicated in brackets.

b No CC was assigned by the microarray. Isolates of spa type t015 assigned to CC45 have been previously reported [12,19,20].

c allelic variant sea N315

d Enterotoxin gene cluster (egc) containing genes: seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, seu

a If not all isolates assigned to the respective spa type harbored a gene, the number of positive isolates is indicated in brackets. b No CC was assigned by the microarray. Isolates of spa type t015 assigned to CC45 have been previously reported [12,19,20]. c allelic variant sea N315 d Enterotoxin gene cluster (egc) containing genes: seg, sei, sem, sen, seo, seu One of the isolates (t015) appeared as spa-negative on the DNA microarray, while another (t337) was fnbA-negative in the microarray. This may hamper recognition by rapid S. aureus identification tests relying on latex agglutination via binding with human IgG or fibrinogen, respectively (e.g. Staphaurex by Remel, Oxoid AG, Pratteln, Switzerland) [37]

Resistance genes

Among the tested antibiotic resistance genes, blaZ/I/R, qacC, fosB, vgaA, tetK/M, and aacA-aphD were found. As depicted in Table 2, CC398 appeared to exhibit the most heterogeneous resistance profile compared to other complexes. For CC398 isolates, resistance genes blaZ/I/R conferring β-lactam resistance were detected as well as vgaA contributing to streptogramin-A resistance and the tetracycline resistance markers tetK and tetM. No MRSA were detected among the S. aureus isolates investigated in this study. Occurrence of MRSA has been scarcely described in CC7 or CC49 [38]. In contrast, MRSA have been found regularly in CC1, CC9, CC30, CC45 and CC398 [38,39]. CC398 has lately received a lot of attention as a source of livestock-associated MRSA in the Netherlands, Germany, Belgium, Italy, Austria, Spain, the USA and Australia [40-43]. The presence of tetracycline resistance genes tetK and tetM in CC398 characterized in our study reinforce the potential of these strains to act as precursors for CC398 LA-MRSA emergence, as CC398 MRSA are always tetracycline resistant [44]. Other resistance genes appearing in various strains were the fosB gene coding for a metallothiol transferase, qacC the quaternary ammonium compound resistance protein C and aacA-aphD conferring gentamicin and tobramycin resistance.

Enterotoxin genes

The studied set of isolates displayed a variety of enterotoxin genes, which were heterogeneously distributed within clonal complexes and spa types. As illustrated in Table 2, sea (N315) was present in CC1, CC7, CC49, and CC398. The gene coding for enterotoxin B (seb) was found in CC1, CC9, CC30, and CC398. The seh gene was distributed across CC1, CC7, CC9, CC30, and CC398. The most prevalent toxin genes were the egc encoded genes seg, sei, sem, sen, seo and seu, which were detected in 11 strains belonging to CC1, CC7, CC9, CC49, and CC398. On conventional cuts of pork meat similar enterotoxin profiles have been reported [10,45]. Interestingly, only one strain isolated from a heart harbored the sec and sel genes. Only two strains (spa types t015 & t7439) did not harbor any of the tested enterotoxin genes.

Similarity of genomic profiles

Visualization of similarity of microarray hybridization profiles in a Splitstree (Fig 1) revealed an association of certain CCs and abattoirs. No association of CCs with particular body parts or outer/inner organs was observed. However, S. aureus from certain body parts were associated with certain abattoirs, e. g. S. aureus were only detected in sternum and rib bone samples originating from abattoir D. It could be hypothesized that such isolates stem from post mortem contamination during the slaughtering and meat handling process, rather than from the animal source.

Conclusion and outlook

Sampling of pork byproducts in Switzerland demonstrated low prevalence of S. aureus. Microarray based genetic profiling of 40 S. aureus isolates revealed a diverse population structure. No MRSA were detected. A variety of enterotoxin genes was found distributed over almost all clonal complexes. Overall, the isolates did not differ considerably from those found in previous studies in conventional pork meat cuts. Our findings suggest that occurrence of S. aureus on byproducts was linked to contamination during the slaughtering process in some abattoirs. Adequate handling of these processing sidestreams should ensure proper quality and therefore minimize product loss.

Microarray profile raw data.

The outcome of every hybridization reaction is shown as either positive, negative, or ambiguous as analyzed by the ArrayMate reader (Alere). (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  37 in total

1.  Typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a university hospital setting by using novel software for spa repeat determination and database management.

Authors:  Dag Harmsen; Heike Claus; Wolfgang Witte; Jörg Rothgänger; Hermann Claus; Doris Turnwald; Ulrich Vogel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies.

Authors:  Daniel H Huson; David Bryant
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Classifying spa types in complexes improves interpretation of typing results for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Werner Ruppitsch; Alexander Indra; Anna Stöger; Barbara Mayer; Silke Stadlbauer; Günther Wewalka; Franz Allerberger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  High interlaboratory reproducibility of DNA sequence-based typing of bacteria in a multicenter study.

Authors:  M Aires-de-Sousa; K Boye; H de Lencastre; A Deplano; M C Enright; J Etienne; A Friedrich; D Harmsen; A Holmes; X W Huijsdens; A M Kearns; A Mellmann; H Meugnier; J K Rasheed; E Spalburg; B Strommenger; M J Struelens; F C Tenover; J Thomas; U Vogel; H Westh; J Xu; W Witte
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming.

Authors:  Xander W Huijsdens; Beatrix J van Dijke; Emile Spalburg; Marga G van Santen-Verheuvel; Max E O C Heck; Gerlinde N Pluister; Andreas Voss; Wim J B Wannet; Albert J de Neeling
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2006-11-10       Impact factor: 3.944

6.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database.

Authors:  Linda K McDougal; Christine D Steward; George E Killgore; Jasmine M Chaitram; Sigrid K McAllister; Fred C Tenover
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream isolates collected in a Dutch University Hospital between 1999 and 2006.

Authors:  Eric Nulens; Ellen E Stobberingh; Helke van Dessel; Silvie Sebastian; Frank H van Tiel; Patrick S Beisser; Ruud H Deurenberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in meat products, the Netherlands.

Authors:  Inge H M van Loo; Bram M W Diederen; Paul H M Savelkoul; Joyce H C Woudenberg; Robert Roosendaal; Alex van Belkum; Nicole Lemmens-den Toom; Carlo Verhulst; Peter H J van Keulen; Jan A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming.

Authors:  Andreas Voss; Frans Loeffen; Judith Bakker; Come Klaassen; Mireille Wulf
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 6.883

10.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers.

Authors:  Tara C Smith; Michael J Male; Abby L Harper; Jennifer S Kroeger; Gregory P Tinkler; Erin D Moritz; Ana W Capuano; Loreen A Herwaldt; Daniel J Diekema
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nitrite stress increases staphylococcal enterotoxin C transcription and triggers the SigB regulon.

Authors:  Danai Etter; Ramona Büchel; Tabea Patt; Michael Biggel; Taurai Tasara; Nicole Cernela; Marc J A Stevens; Sophia Johler
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 2.820

Review 2.  Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Detection Methods for Bacteria in Animal-Based Foods: A Brief Review of Highlights and Advantages.

Authors:  Beatriz S P Galhano; Rafaela G Ferrari; Pedro Panzenhagen; Ana Carolina S de Jesus; Carlos A Conte-Junior
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-04-26

3.  Contamination of Retail Meat Samples with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms in Relation to Organic and Conventional Production and Processing: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data from the United States National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System, 2012-2017.

Authors:  Gabriel K Innes; Keeve E Nachman; Alison G Abraham; Joan A Casey; Andrew N Patton; Lance B Price; Sara Y Tartof; Meghan F Davis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Towards understanding the antagonistic activity of phytic acid against common foodborne bacterial pathogens using a general linear model.

Authors:  Ines Boukhris; Slim Smaoui; Karim Ennouri; Nawres Morjene; Ameny Farhat-Khemakhem; Monia Blibech; Othman A Alghamdi; Hichem Chouayekh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.