Literature DB >> 31490859

Ten Years of Kidney Paired Donation at Mayo Clinic: The Benefits of Incorporating ABO/HLA Compatible Pairs.

Arpita Basu1, Mikel Prieto2, Catherine Kosberg2, Martin L Mai3, Hasan A Khamash4, Caroline C Jadlowiec4, Naim S Issa2, Patrick G Dean2, Elizabeth C Lorenz2, Mark D Stegall2, Carrie A Schinstock2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the 10-year experience of Mayo Clinic's kidney paired donation (KPD).We aimed to determine the benefits for the recipients of enrolled ABO/HLA compatible pairs and determine the factors associated with prolonged KPD waiting time.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 332 kidney transplants facilitated by the Mayo 3-site KPD program from September 2007 to June 2018.
RESULTS: The median (interquartile range) time from KPD entry to transplantation was 89 days (42-187 days). The factors independently associated with receiving a transplant >3 months after KPD entry included recipient blood type O and calculated panel reactive antibodies ≥98%. Fifty-four ABO/HLA compatible pairs participated in KPD for the following reasons: cytomegalovirus mismatch (18.5% [10/54]), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) mismatch (EBV) (9.3% [5/54]), age/size mismatch (51.9% [28/54]), or altruistic reasons (20.3% [11/54]). Cytomegalovirus and EBV mismatch were avoided in 90% (9/10) and 100% (5/5) of cases. Recipients who entered KPD for age/size mismatch and altruistic reasons received kidneys from donors with lower Living Kidney Donor Profile Index scores than their actual donor (median [interquartile range] 31.5 [12.3-47]; P < 0.001 and 26 (-1 to 46); P = 0.01 points lower, respectively). Median time to transplant from KPD entry for compatible pair recipients was 70 days (41-163 days), and 44.4% (24/54) of these transplants were preemptive. All chains/swaps incorporating compatible pairs included ABO/HLA incompatible pairs.
CONCLUSIONS: KPD should be considered for all living donor/recipient pairs because the recipients of these pairs can derive personal benefit from KPD while increasing the donor pool for difficult to match pairs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31490859      PMCID: PMC7359217          DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   5.385


  23 in total

1.  Impact of donor and recipient age difference on long-term allograft survival after living donor renal transplantation: analysis of 478 cases.

Authors:  Ioannis D Kostakis; Demetrios N Moris; Alexandros Barlas; Ioannis Bokos; Maria Darema; Eleni Theodoropoulou; Georgios Karaolanis; Alkiviadis Kostakis; Ioannis Boletis; Georgios Zavos
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Donor-recipient age difference and graft survival in living donor kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Y J Lee; J H Chang; H N Choi; J Y Jung; Y S Kim; W K Chung; Y H Park; H H Lee
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.066

Review 3.  Kidney paired donation.

Authors:  C Bradley Wallis; Kannan P Samy; Alvin E Roth; Michael A Rees
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Equipoise: ethical, scientific, and clinical trial design considerations for compatible pair participation in kidney exchange programs.

Authors:  M C Cuffy; L E Ratner; M Siegler; E S Woodle
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 8.086

5.  Effect of donor-recipient age difference on long-term graft survival in living kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Masayuki Tasaki; Kazuhide Saito; Yuki Nakagawa; Masahiro Ikeda; Naofumi Imai; Ichiei Narita; Kota Takahashi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Providing Better-Matched Donors for HLA Mismatched Compatible Pairs Through Kidney Paired Donation.

Authors:  Paolo Ferrari; Linda Cantwell; Joseph Ta; Claudia Woodroffe; Lloyd DʼOrsogna; Rhonda Holdsworth
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Donor-Recipient Weight and Sex Mismatch and the Risk of Graft Loss in Renal Transplantation.

Authors:  Amanda J Miller; Bryce A Kiberd; Ian P Alwayn; Ayo Odutayo; Karthik K Tennankore
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Desensitization in the era of kidney paired donation: the Mayo Foundation 3-site experience.

Authors:  Carrie Schinstock; Patrick G Dean; Han Li; Edward T Casey; Kunam S Reddy; Hasan A Khamash; Raymond L Heilman; Martin L Mai; C Burcin Taner; Catherine L Kosbergl; Lisa L Bakken; Elmira J Wozniak; Kathleen L Giles; Lisa A Veal; Manish J Gandhi; Fernando G Cosio; Mikel Prieto; Mark D Stegall
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  2013

9.  Opposition to irresponsible global kidney exchange.

Authors:  Francis L Delmonico; Nancy L Ascher
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  HLA Matching Trumps Donor Age: Donor-Recipient Pairing Characteristics That Impact Long-Term Success in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in the Era of Paired Kidney Exchange.

Authors:  John Milner; Marc L Melcher; Brian Lee; Jeff Veale; Matthew Ronin; Tom D'Alessandro; Garet Hil; Phillip C Fry; Patrick W Shannon
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2016-06-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  In Search of a Better Outcome: Opting Into the Live Donor Paired Kidney Exchange Program.

Authors:  Amanda J Vinson; Bryce A Kiberd; Karthik K Tennankore
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2021-05-26

2.  A Statistical Prediction Model for Survival After Kidney Transplantation from Deceased Donors.

Authors:  Jia-Shan Pan; Yi-Ding Chen; Han-Dong Ding; Tian-Chi Lan; Fei Zhang; Jin-Biao Zhong; Gui-Yi Liao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-01-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.