Literature DB >> 31490691

Calculation of Second Virial Coefficients of Atomistic Proteins Using Fast Fourier Transform.

Sanbo Qin1,2, Huan-Xiang Zhou1.   

Abstract

The second virial coefficient, B2, measures a protein solution's deviation from ideal behavior. It is widely used to predict or explain solubility, crystallization condition, aggregation propensity, and critical temperature for liquid-liquid phase separation. B2 is determined by the interaction energy between two protein molecules and, specifically, by the integration of the Mayer f-function in the relative configurational space (translation and rotation) of the two molecules. Simple theoretical models, such as one attributed to Derjaguin, Landau, Verwey, and Overbeek (DLVO), can fit the dependence of B2 on salt concentrations. However, model parameters derived often are physically unrealistic and hardly transferable from protein to protein. Previous B2 calculations incorporating atomistic details were done with limited sampling in the configurational space, due to enormous computational cost. Our FMAP method, based on fast Fourier transform, can considerably accelerate such calculations, and here we adapt it to calculate B2 values for proteins represented at the atomic level in implicit solvent. After tuning of a single parameter in the energy function, FMAPB2 predicts well the B2 values for lysozyme and other proteins over wide ranges of solvent conditions (salt concentration, pH, and temperature). The method is available as a web server at http://pipe.rcc.fsu.edu/fmapb2 .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31490691      PMCID: PMC7032052          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b06808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  42 in total

1.  Hydrophobic forces between protein molecules in aqueous solutions of concentrated electrolyte.

Authors:  R A Curtis; C Steinbrecher; M Heinemann; H W Blanch; J M Prausnitz
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2002-08-02       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Predicting protein crystallization from a dilute solution property.

Authors:  A George; W W Wilson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  1994-07-01

3.  New methods for measuring macromolecular interactions in solution via static light scattering: basic methodology and application to nonassociating and self-associating proteins.

Authors:  Arun K Attri; Allen P Minton
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.365

4.  The inverse and direct Hofmeister series for lysozyme.

Authors:  Yanjie Zhang; Paul S Cremer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Determination of the second virial coefficient of bovine serum albumin under varying pH and ionic strength by composition-gradient multi-angle static light scattering.

Authors:  Yingfang Ma; Diana M Acosta; Jon R Whitney; Rudolf Podgornik; Nicole F Steinmetz; Roger H French; V Adrian Parsegian
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 1.365

6.  Similar interaction chromatography of proteins: A cross interaction chromatographic approach to estimate the osmotic second virial coefficient.

Authors:  A Quigley; D R Williams
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Using the fast fourier transform in binding free energy calculations.

Authors:  Trung Hai Nguyen; Huan-Xiang Zhou; David D L Minh
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Effect of alcohols on aqueous lysozyme-lysozyme interactions from static light-scattering measurements.

Authors:  Wei Liu; Dusan Bratko; John M Prausnitz; Harvey W Blanch
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 2.352

Review 9.  Why Do Disordered and Structured Proteins Behave Differently in Phase Separation?

Authors:  Huan-Xiang Zhou; Valery Nguemaha; Konstantinos Mazarakos; Sanbo Qin
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 13.807

10.  PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations.

Authors:  Todd J Dolinsky; Paul Czodrowski; Hui Li; Jens E Nielsen; Jan H Jensen; Gerhard Klebe; Nathan A Baker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  6 in total

1.  Calculating Binodals and Interfacial Tension of Phase-Separated Condensates from Molecular Simulations with Finite-Size Corrections.

Authors:  Konstantinos Mazarakos; Sanbo Qin; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2023

2.  Characterizing protein kinase A (PKA) subunits as macromolecular regulators of PKA RIα liquid-liquid phase separation.

Authors:  Surl-Hee Ahn; Sanbo Qin; Jason Z Zhang; J Andrew McCammon; Jin Zhang; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.304

3.  Deamidation of the human eye lens protein γS-crystallin accelerates oxidative aging.

Authors:  Brenna Norton-Baker; Pedram Mehrabi; Ashley O Kwok; Kyle W Roskamp; Megan A Rocha; Marc A Sprague-Piercy; David von Stetten; R J Dwayne Miller; Rachel W Martin
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.871

4.  Simple Calculation of Phase Diagrams for Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Solutions of Two Macromolecular Solute Species.

Authors:  Allen P Minton
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  Computational models for studying physical instabilities in high concentration biotherapeutic formulations.

Authors:  Marco A Blanco
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 5.857

6.  Quantifying Protein-Protein Interactions in Molecular Simulations.

Authors:  Alfredo Jost Lopez; Patrick K Quoika; Max Linke; Gerhard Hummer; Jürgen Köfinger
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.991

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.