| Literature DB >> 31488895 |
Maartje Pennings1, Meyke I Schouten1, Judith van Gaalen2, Rowdy P P Meijer1, Susanne T de Bot3, Marjolein Kriek4, Christiaan G J Saris2, Leonard H van den Berg5, Michael A van Es5, Dick M H Zuidgeest6, Mariet W Elting7, Jiddeke M van de Kamp7, Karin Y van Spaendonck-Zwarts8, Christine de Die-Smulders9, Eva H Brilstra10, Corien C Verschuuren11, Bert B A de Vries1, Jacques Bruijn12, Kalliopi Sofou13, Floor A Duijkers8, B Jaeger14, Jolanda H Schieving15, Bart P van de Warrenburg2, Erik-Jan Kamsteeg16.
Abstract
Variants in the KIF1A gene can cause autosomal recessive spastic paraplegia 30, autosomal recessive hereditary sensory neuropathy, or autosomal (de novo) dominant mental retardation type 9. More recently, variants in KIF1A have also been described in a few cases with autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia. Here, we describe 20 KIF1A variants in 24 patients from a clinical exome sequencing cohort of 347 individuals with a mostly 'pure' spastic paraplegia. In these patients, spastic paraplegia was slowly progressive and mostly pure, but with a highly variable disease onset (0-57 years). Segregation analyses showed a de novo occurrence in seven cases, and a dominant inheritance pattern in 11 families. The motor domain of KIF1A is a hotspot for disease causing variants in autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia, similar to mental retardation type 9 and recessive spastic paraplegia type 30. However, unlike these allelic disorders, dominant spastic paraplegia was also caused by loss-of-function variants outside this domain in six families. Finally, three missense variants were outside the motor domain and need further characterization. In conclusion, KIF1A variants are a frequent cause of autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia in our cohort (6-7%). The identification of KIF1A loss-of-function variants suggests haploinsufficiency as a possible mechanism in autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31488895 PMCID: PMC6906463 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0497-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Hum Genet ISSN: 1018-4813 Impact factor: 4.246
KIF1A variants in autosomal dominant HSP
| Family | Variant (heterozygous) DNA; protein | Domain | CADD (PHRED) | Freq in ExAC/gnomAD | Evolutionary conservation | LOVD ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | c.89T>C; p.(Met30Thr) | Motor | 26.4 | 0/0 | M, F, DM | 00225586 |
| P2 | c.167A>G; p.(Tyr56Cys) | Motor | 28.6 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225587 |
| P3 | c.206C>T; p.(Ser69Leu) | Motor | 16.3 | 0/0 | M | 00246956 |
| P4 | c.221A>G; p.(Tyr74Cys)a | Motor | 25.7 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225589 |
| P5 | c.232G>A; p.(Gly78Ser) | Motor | 34 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225590 |
| P6 | c.317C>A; p.(Thr106Asn) | Motor | 26.3 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225591 |
| P7 | c.500G>A; p.(Arg167His) | Motor | 34 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225592 |
| P8 | c.518T>C; p.(Leu173Pro) | Motor | 27 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225593 |
| P9/10 | c.756C>G; p.(Ser252Arg) | Motor | 25.1 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225594 00246690 |
| P11/12/13 | c.773C>T; p.(Thr258Met) | Motor | 28.5 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225610 00246691 00246692 |
| P14 | c.1048C>T; p.(Arg350Trp) | Motor | 12.95 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225611 |
| P15 | c.1379C>G; p.(Ala460Gly) | Coiled coil | 25.3 | 0/0 | M, F | 00225612 |
| P16 | c.1867C>T; p.(Gln623*) | ni | 38 | 0/0 | ni | 00225613 |
| P17/18 | c.2527C>T; p.(Arg843Cys) | – | 35 | 1/244238 | M, F | 00225614 00246693 |
| P19 | c.2577C>A; p.(Asn859Lys) | – | 28.9 | 0/0 | M, F, DM, CE | 00225615 |
| P20 | c.3975C>G; p.(Tyr1325*) | ni | 29.1 | 0/0 | ni | 00225616 |
| P21 | c.4096_4103dup; (p.(Asp1369fs) | ni | 11.05 | 0/0 | ni | 00343920 |
| P22 | c.4292del; p.(Pro1431fs) | ni | 22.5 | 0/0 | M, F | 00225617 |
| P23 | c.4740dup; p.(Tyr1581fs) | ni | 35 | 0/0 | ni | 00225618 |
| P24 | Chr2[GRCh37]:g.(238475818_ 238482964)_(243037178_qter)del | ni | ni | ni | ni | 00245206 |
Variants are described according to HGVS nomenclature. Protein domains are according to UniProt consortium (https://www.uniprot.org). Due to nonsense-mediated decay domain of loss-of-function variants are not informative (ni). CADD scores (vs 1.3) and population frequencies were obtained through https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/ and http://exac.broadinstitute.org, respectively. Conservation was determined using ensemble alignments
M mammals, F fish, DM Drosophila melanogaster, CE C.elegans, ni not informative
aThis family has been described [15]
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the KIF1A protein with variants in dominant spastic paraplegia. Variants identified in this study are depicted above the schematic protein, isoform NP_004312.2, while previously described variants in autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia [11–13, 15, 29–32] are shown below the schematic. Protein domains are according to UniProt consortium (https://www.uniprot.org), with kinesin motor, cc coiled coil, FHA forkhead-associated, PH pleckstrin homology domains. aThis family has been described [15]
Fig. 2Pedigrees of the 24 families with HSP. Generations are given in Roman numbers, circles are females, squares are males, solid symbols are affected individuals. Deceased individuals are crossed out. Variants are indicated above the pedigree’s by protein nomenclature and indicated by variant (+) and wild type (−) under each tested individual. Arrows indicate the probands. The full HGVS nomenclature of the Chr2q37 deletion is Chr2[GRCh37]:g.(238475818_238482964)_(243037178_qter)del
Fig. 3Schematic representation of the KIF1A protein with all variants in the allelic disorders. All variants identified in spastic paraplegia are depicted above the schematic protein in red open triangles (autosomal dominant) or blue solid triangles (autosomal recessive), while variants in mental retardation type 9 and hereditary sensory neuropathy IIC are shown below the schematic in green open diamonds and purple solid dots, respectively. Protein domains are according to UniProt consortium (https://www.uniprot.org)
Clinical characteristics of probands with KIF1A variants
| Patient | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | P14 | P15 | P16 | P17 | P18 | P19 | P20 | P21 | P22 | P23 | P24 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family history | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | + | + | + | + | ? | − | + | + | + | − | − |
| Age at onset (y) | <1 | 9 | 13 | <10 | 21 | >18 | 50 | <10 | 57 | <10 | <10 | <1 | 1 | <10 | ~20 | ~30 | 1 | 46 | 10 | <10 | 2 | 2 | <5 | 1 |
| Age (years) | 56 | 14 | 17 | 53 | 38 | 54 | 64 | 50 | 62 | 49 | 18 | 4 | 3 | 54 | 28 | 60 | 19 | 56 | 51 | 66 | 12 | 22 | 20 | 6, 5 |
| Cognitiona | N | N | IQ80 | N | N | N | N | IQ77 | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | IQ57 |
| Walking aid | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| LL spasticity | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| LL weakness | + | + | + | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | + | |
| LL deep sensory disturbances | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | − | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | ? | ? | |
| PTR | ↑ | ? | ↑ | ↑ | ↑↑ | ↑ | ↑↑ | ↑↑ | ↑↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
| ATR | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑↑ | ↑↑ | ↑↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ |
| Extensor plantar response | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | − |
| UL spasticity | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| UL weakness | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | ? | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| UL sensory disturbances | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | ? | − | − | − | − | − | − | ? |
| UL DTR | ↑ | N | N | ↓ | N | N | ? | N | N | ↑ | ↑ | N | N | N | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | ↑ | N | N | N | N | N |
| Urinary sphincter problems | + | + | + | − | + | − | + | + | − | − | + | − | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | + |
| Brain and or spine MRI | ? | N | ? | ? | N | N | ? | ? | N | ? | N | TCC | TCC | ? | N | N | N | N | N | ? | ? | ? | N | N |
LL lower limb, UL upper limb, PTR patellar tendon reflex, ATR Achilles tendon reflex, DTR deep tendon reflexes, + present, − absent, N normal, ↑ increased, ↓ decreased, L left, R right, ? no data, TCC thin corpus callosum
aNot formally assessed in most; based on clinical impression, school performance, and/or current employment