Literature DB >> 31488568

Temporal Trends and Contemporary Use of Insulin Pump Therapy and Glucose Monitoring Among Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Between 1995 and 2017.

Louisa van den Boom1, Beate Karges2, Marie Auzanneau3,4, Birgit Rami-Merhar5, Eggert Lilienthal6, Simone von Sengbusch7, Nicolin Datz8, Carmen Schröder9, Thomas Kapellen10, Markus Laimer11, Sebastian M Schmid4,12, Heiko Müller13, Johannes Wolf14, Reinhard W Holl3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate temporal trends and contemporary use of insulin pump therapy and glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a population-based study, we analyzed the use of insulin pump therapy, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) from 1995 to 2017 in patients with type 1 diabetes identified from the Diabetes Prospective Follow-up (DPV) database in Germany and Austria. Patients were stratified by age, sex, migration background, and country.
RESULTS: Among 96,547 patients with type 1 diabetes (median age 17.9 years, 53% males), the percentage using insulin pump therapy increased from 1% in 1995 to 53% in 2017, with the highest rates in the youngest patients (92% in preschoolers, 74% in children, 56% in adolescents aged <15 years, 46% in adolescents aged ≥15 years, 37% in adults). The percentage of patients using CGM increased from 3% in 2006 to 38% in 2017, with the highest rates in the youngest patients (58%, 52%, 45%, 33%, and 15% of respective age-groups). Daily SMBG frequencies increased from 1995 to 2016 and decreased afterward, most prominently in the youngest patients. Between 2015 and 2017, pump therapy was more frequently used in female versus male adolescents and adults (all P < 0.001), while no sex differences were observed for pump use in children <10 years (all P = 1.0) and for CGM use in all age-groups (all P = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Since 1995, insulin pump use has continuously increased, and insulin pump therapy is now standard in patients aged <15 years. CGM use sharply rose in recent years, particularly in young children.
© 2019 by the American Diabetes Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31488568     DOI: 10.2337/dc19-0345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  38 in total

1.  Availability of and access to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy for adults with type 1 diabetes in Ireland.

Authors:  Katarzyna Anna Gajewska; Regien Biesma; Kathleen Bennett; Seamus Sreenan
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.280

2.  Multimorbidity Among Adult Outpatients With Type 1 Diabetes in Germany.

Authors:  Louisa van den Boom; Gebhard Buchal; Marcel Kaiser; Karel Kostev
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-23

3.  High Frequency of Dermatological Complications in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Web-Based Survey.

Authors:  Fortunato Lombardo; Stefano Passanisi; Davide Tinti; Maria Francesca Messina; Giuseppina Salzano; Ivana Rabbone
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-08-06

Review 4.  Open-source automated insulin delivery: international consensus statement and practical guidance for health-care professionals.

Authors:  Katarina Braune; Rayhan A Lal; Lenka Petruželková; Gary Scheiner; Per Winterdijk; Signe Schmidt; Linda Raimond; Korey K Hood; Michael C Riddell; Timothy C Skinner; Klemens Raile; Sufyan Hussain
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 32.069

Review 5.  Advances, Challenges, and Cost Associated with Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Adolescents and Young Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.

Authors:  Karishma A Datye; Daniel R Tilden; Angelee M Parmar; Eveline R Goethals; Sarah S Jaser
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Adjustment of Insulin Pump Settings in Type 1 Diabetes Management: Advisor Pro Device Compared to Physicians' Recommendations.

Authors:  Revital Nimri; Tal Oron; Ido Muller; Ivana Kraljevic; Montserrat Martín Alonso; Paivi Keskinen; Tanja Milicic; Asaf Oren; Athanasios Christoforidis; Marieke den Brinker; Lutgarda Bozzetto; Andrea Mario Bolla; Michal Krcma; Rosa Anna Rabini; Shadi Tabba; Lizl Smith; Andriani Vazeou; Giulio Maltoni; Elisa Giani; Eran Atlas; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-26

7.  Technological Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools to Study Type 1 Diabetes in Youth: Viewpoint of Methodologies.

Authors:  Mary Katherine Ray; Alana McMichael; Maria Rivera-Santana; Jacob Noel; Tamara Hershey
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2021-06-03

8.  Associations of Time in Range and Other Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Metrics With Well-Being and Patient-Reported Outcomes: Overview and Trends.

Authors:  Dominic Ehrmann; Lilli Priesterroth; Andreas Schmitt; Bernhard Kulzer; Norbert Hermanns
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-05-25

9.  A Decade of Disparities in Diabetes Technology Use and HbA1c in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes: A Transatlantic Comparison.

Authors:  Ananta Addala; Marie Auzanneau; Kellee Miller; Werner Maier; Nicole Foster; Thomas Kapellen; Ashby Walker; Joachim Rosenbauer; David M Maahs; Reinhard W Holl
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 10.  [Individualization of diabetes treatment by automated insulin delivery].

Authors:  T Biester; K Dovc; A Chobot; M Tauschmann; T Kapellen
Journal:  Monatsschr Kinderheilkd       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 0.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.