Literature DB >> 31487761

The Impact of Patient's Pain and Fatigue on the Discharge Decision After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Won Beom Jung1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31487761      PMCID: PMC6732322          DOI: 10.3393/ac.2019.07.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Coloproctol        ISSN: 2287-9714


× No keyword cloud information.
See Article on Page 209-215 In Korea, from 2013 to 2015, 57,258 patients underwent open or laparoscopic resections for colorectal cancer (CRC), and the rates of laparoscopic surgery were 65.0%, 69.2%, and 72.5% in 2013, 2014, and 2015 respectively [1]. Numerous randomized controlled trials have revealed that laparoscopic colorectal surgery has the following advantages over conventional open surgery: less postoperative pain, faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, and earlier return to social activity [2-4]. Therefore, the length of hospital stay for patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for CRC has decreased compared to that in the past. Moreover, recent guidelines and protocols for perioperative care in elective colorectal surgery, including the clinical pathway and the enhanced recovery after surgery pathway, can lead to faster recovery and faster return to society and can decrease the length of hospital stay [5-7]. However, a concern exists that these guidelines and minimally invasive surgery may result in excessive standardization of hospital stay. Concerning the length of hospital stay, these authors wondered whether other factors, including the patient’s education, counseling, the patient’s socioeconomic status, and the subjective symptoms of the patients, influenced the decision for discharge [8]. This study aimed to estimate a patient’s expectations for discharge after surgery through a questionnaire and to investigate subjective factors that might affect patient satisfaction and the discharge decision. The questionnaire consisted of 3 parts. Parts 1 and 2 were given to patients before surgery. Part 1 addressed the patient’s demographics, and part 2 addressed the patient’s expectations for discharge, such as the amount of food, number of bowel movements until discharge, degree of pain, degree of activity, and self-efficacy. Part 3 addressed the degree of subjective discomfort the patients were experiencing at the time the discharge decision was made. A total of 91 patients provided consent and were included in the study. According to the results of part 2, the patients thought that the level of activity (n = 35), amount of food (n = 24), and number of bowel movements (n = 19) were more important factors for the discharge decision than the degree of pain (n = 10), ability to pay (n = 1), and presence of caregivers (n = 2). The patients were classified into group A (n = 74) who complied with the medical professional’s decision on discharge and group B (n = 17) who refused discharge against the medical professional’s decision. The patients in group B were more likely to have subjective pain, fatigue, and inactivity than those in group A. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups in terms of satisfaction with diet, subjective gastrointestinal symptoms, and subjective daily living activities. This study showed that subjective pain and fatigue were significantly related to the refusal to comply with the discharge decision. Few comparative studies about the association of hospital stay with subjective symptoms, excluding objective signs and data, have been published [9]. This study focused not only on the subjective symptoms of pain and fatigue but also on education, counseling, and compliance with the physician’s decision. A prospective survey, including questionnaires and education materials, such as diagrams of treatment plans and timetables, may reduce the gap between patient’s expectation for discharge and the physician’s decision. Furthermore, these efforts can avoid generalizing discharge decisions and enhance individualization and personalization in postoperative management of patients after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection.

Authors:  K C H Fearon; O Ljungqvist; M Von Meyenfeldt; A Revhaug; C H C Dejong; K Lassen; J Nygren; J Hausel; M Soop; J Andersen; H Kehlet
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 7.324

Review 2.  Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Recommendations: 2018.

Authors:  U O Gustafsson; M J Scott; M Hubner; J Nygren; N Demartines; N Francis; T A Rockall; T M Young-Fadok; A G Hill; M Soop; H D de Boer; R D Urman; G J Chang; A Fichera; H Kessler; F Grass; E E Whang; W J Fawcett; F Carli; D N Lobo; K E Rollins; A Balfour; G Baldini; B Riedel; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for Noncolorectal Surgery?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Major Abdominal Surgery.

Authors:  Anthony Visioni; Rupen Shah; Emmanuel Gabriel; Kristopher Attwood; Moshim Kukar; Steven Nurkin
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Benefits of preoperative education for adult elective surgery patients.

Authors:  Nancy Kruzik
Journal:  AORN J       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 0.676

6.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Seung-Yong Jeong; Ji Won Park; Byung Ho Nam; Sohee Kim; Sung-Bum Kang; Seok-Byung Lim; Hyo Seong Choi; Duck-Woo Kim; Hee Jin Chang; Dae Yong Kim; Kyung Hae Jung; Tae-You Kim; Gyeong Hoon Kang; Eui Kyu Chie; Sun Young Kim; Dae Kyung Sohn; Dae-Hyun Kim; Jae-Sung Kim; Hye Seung Lee; Jee Hyun Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Impact of Patient's Pain and Fatigue on Decision of Discharge After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Gyeora Lee; Jun-Suh Lee; Ji Hoon Kim; Duk Yeon Hwang; Yoon-Suk Lee
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2019-08-31
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.