Literature DB >> 31486666

Attentional capture helps explain why moral and emotional content go viral.

William J Brady1, Ana P Gantman1, Jay J Van Bavel2.   

Abstract

Our social media newsfeeds are filled with a variety of content all battling for our limited attention. Across 3 studies, we investigated whether moral and emotional content captures our attention more than other content and if this may help explain why this content is more likely to go viral online. Using a combination of controlled lab experiments and nearly 50,000 political tweets, we found that moral and emotional content are prioritized in early visual attention more than neutral content, and that such attentional capture is associated with increased retweets during political conversations online. Furthermore, we found that the differences in attentional capture among moral and emotional stimuli could not be fully explained by differences in arousal. These studies suggest that attentional capture is 1 basic psychological process that helps explain the increased diffusion of moral and emotional content during political discourse on social media, and shed light on ways in which political leaders, disinformation profiteers, marketers, and activist organizations can spread moralized content by capitalizing on natural tendencies of our perceptual systems. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31486666     DOI: 10.1037/xge0000673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  10 in total

1.  Citizens Versus the Internet: Confronting Digital Challenges With Cognitive Tools.

Authors:  Anastasia Kozyreva; Stephan Lewandowsky; Ralph Hertwig
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2020-12

2.  Psychological Science in the Wake of COVID-19: Social, Methodological, and Metascientific Considerations.

Authors:  Daniel L Rosenfeld; Emily Balcetis; Brock Bastian; Elliot T Berkman; Jennifer K Bosson; Tiffany N Brannon; Anthony L Burrow; C Daryl Cameron; Serena Chen; Jonathan E Cook; Christian Crandall; Shai Davidai; Kristof Dhont; Paul W Eastwick; Sarah E Gaither; Steven W Gangestad; Thomas Gilovich; Kurt Gray; Elizabeth L Haines; Martie G Haselton; Nick Haslam; Gordon Hodson; Michael A Hogg; Matthew J Hornsey; Yuen J Huo; Samantha Joel; Frank J Kachanoff; Gordon Kraft-Todd; Mark R Leary; Alison Ledgerwood; Randy T Lee; Steve Loughnan; Cara C MacInnis; Traci Mann; Damian R Murray; Carolyn Parkinson; Efrén O Pérez; Tom Pyszczynski; Kaylin Ratner; Hank Rothgerber; James D Rounds; Mark Schaller; Roxane Cohen Silver; Barbara A Spellman; Nina Strohminger; Janet K Swim; Felix Thoemmes; Betul Urganci; Joseph A Vandello; Sarah Volz; Vivian Zayas; A Janet Tomiyama
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-10-01

3.  Corona and value change. The role of social media and emotional contagion.

Authors:  Steffen Steinert
Journal:  Ethics Inf Technol       Date:  2020-07-21

4.  Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex response to negative tweets relates to executive functioning.

Authors:  Sarah M Tashjian; Adriana Galván
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  The time course of moral perception: an ERP investigation of the moral pop-out effect.

Authors:  Ana Gantman; Sayeed Devraj-Kizuk; Peter Mende-Siedlecki; Jay J Van Bavel; Kyle E Mathewson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  An energizing role for motivation in information-seeking during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ran R Hassin; Daphna Shohamy; Yaniv Abir; Caroline B Marvin; Camilla van Geen; Maya Leshkowitz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 17.694

7.  Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation.

Authors:  Gordon Pennycook; David G Rand
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  Negativity Spreads More than Positivity on Twitter After Both Positive and Negative Political Situations.

Authors:  Jonas Paul Schöne; Brian Parkinson; Amit Goldenberg
Journal:  Affect Sci       Date:  2021-10-12

Review 9.  Polarization in America: two possible futures.

Authors:  Gordon Heltzel; Kristin Laurin
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2020-05-06

10.  Out-group animosity drives engagement on social media.

Authors:  Steve Rathje; Jay J Van Bavel; Sander van der Linden
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.