Megan K Suter1, Kristin A Miller1, Ike Anggraeni2, Kristie L Ebi3,4, Edward T Game5, Jennifer Krenz3, Yuta J Masuda5, Lianne Sheppard3,6, Nicholas H Wolff5, June T Spector3,7. 1. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States. 2. Faculty of Public Health, Mulawarman University, Samarinda, Indonesia. 3. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States. 4. Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States. 5. Global Science, The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, Virginia, United States. 6. Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States. 7. Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With climate change, adverse human health effects caused by heat exposure are of increasing public health concern. Forests provide beneficial ecosystem services for human health, including local cooling. Few studies have assessed the relationship between deforestation and heat-related health effects in tropical, rural populations. We sought to determine whether deforested compared to forested landscapes are associated with increased physiological heat strain in a rural, tropical environment. METHODS: We analyzed data from 363 healthy adult participants from ten villages who participated in a two-by-two factorial, randomized study in East Kalimantan, Indonesia from 10/1/17 to 11/6/17. Using simple randomization, field staff allocated participants equally to different conditions to conduct a 90-minute outdoor activity, representative of typical work. Core body temperature was estimated at each minute during the activity using a validated algorithm from baseline oral temperatures and sequential heart rate data, measured using chest band monitors. We used linear regression models, clustered by village and with a sandwich variance estimator, to assess the association between deforested versus forested conditions and the number of minutes each participant spent above an estimated core body temperature threshold of 38.5°C. RESULTS: Compared to those in the forested condition (n=172), participants in the deforested condition (n=159) spent an average of 3.08 (95% CI 0.57, 5.60) additional minutes with an estimated core body temperature exceeding 38.5°C, after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and experiment start time, with a larger difference among those who began the experiment after 12 noon (5.17 [95% CI 2.20, 8.15]). CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental study in a tropical, rural setting, activity in a deforested versus a forested setting was associated with increased objectively measured heat strain. Longer durations of hyperthermia can increase the risk of serious health outcomes. Land use decisions should consider the implications of deforestation on local heat exposure and health as well as on forest services, including carbon storage functions that impact climate change mitigation.
BACKGROUND: With climate change, adverse human health effects caused by heat exposure are of increasing public health concern. Forests provide beneficial ecosystem services for human health, including local cooling. Few studies have assessed the relationship between deforestation and heat-related health effects in tropical, rural populations. We sought to determine whether deforested compared to forested landscapes are associated with increased physiological heat strain in a rural, tropical environment. METHODS: We analyzed data from 363 healthy adult participants from ten villages who participated in a two-by-two factorial, randomized study in East Kalimantan, Indonesia from 10/1/17 to 11/6/17. Using simple randomization, field staff allocated participants equally to different conditions to conduct a 90-minute outdoor activity, representative of typical work. Core body temperature was estimated at each minute during the activity using a validated algorithm from baseline oral temperatures and sequential heart rate data, measured using chest band monitors. We used linear regression models, clustered by village and with a sandwich variance estimator, to assess the association between deforested versus forested conditions and the number of minutes each participant spent above an estimated core body temperature threshold of 38.5°C. RESULTS: Compared to those in the forested condition (n=172), participants in the deforested condition (n=159) spent an average of 3.08 (95% CI 0.57, 5.60) additional minutes with an estimated core body temperature exceeding 38.5°C, after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and experiment start time, with a larger difference among those who began the experiment after 12 noon (5.17 [95% CI 2.20, 8.15]). CONCLUSIONS: In this experimental study in a tropical, rural setting, activity in a deforested versus a forested setting was associated with increased objectively measured heat strain. Longer durations of hyperthermia can increase the risk of serious health outcomes. Land use decisions should consider the implications of deforestation on local heat exposure and health as well as on forest services, including carbon storage functions that impact climate change mitigation.
Authors: Marco Morabito; Lorenzo Cecchi; Alfonso Crisci; Pietro Amedeo Modesti; Simone Orlandini Journal: Ind Health Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 2.179
Authors: Mark J Buller; William J Tharion; Samuel N Cheuvront; Scott J Montain; Robert W Kenefick; John Castellani; William A Latzka; Warren S Roberts; Mark Richter; Odest Chadwicke Jenkins; Reed W Hoyt Journal: Physiol Meas Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 2.833
Authors: Stephanie M Mazerolle; Matthew S Ganio; Douglas J Casa; Jakob Vingren; Jennifer Klau Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Michelle Lam; Jennifer Krenz; Pablo Palmández; Maria Negrete; Martha Perla; Helen Murphy-Robinson; June T Spector Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Yuta J Masuda; Teevrat Garg; Ike Anggraeni; Kristie Ebi; Jennifer Krenz; Edward T Game; Nicholas H Wolff; June T Spector Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-03-11 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Lucas R Vargas Zeppetello; Susan C Cook-Patton; Luke A Parsons; Nicholas H Wolff; Timm Kroeger; David S Battisti; Joseph Bettles; June T Spector; Arjun Balakumar; Yuta J Masuda Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 14.919