Shannon N Acker1, Brooke Bredbeck2, David A Partrick3, Ann M Kulungowski3, Carlton C Barnett4, Denis D Bensard4. 1. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. Electronic address: shannon.acker@ucdenver.edu. 2. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 3. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 4. Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated previously that shock index, pediatric age-adjusted identifies severely injured children accurately after blunt trauma. We hypothesized that an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted would identify more accurately injured children requiring the highest trauma team activation than age-adjusted hypotension. METHODS: We reviewed all children age 4-16 admitted after blunt trauma with an injury severity score ≥15 from January 2007-June 2013. Criteria used as indicators of need for activation of the trauma team included blood transfusion, emergency operation, or endotracheal intubation within 24 hours of admission. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted represents maximum normal shock index based on age. Cutoffs included shock index >1.22 (ages 4-6), >1.0 (7-12), and >0.9 (13-16). Age-adjusted cutoffs for hypotension were as follows: systolic blood pressure <90 (ages 4-6), systolic blood pressure <100 (7-16). RESULTS: A total of 559 children were included; 21% underwent operation, 37% endotracheal intubation, and 14% transfusion. Hypotension alone predicted poorly the need for operation (13%), endotracheal intubation (17%), or transfusion (22%). Operation (30%), endotracheal intubation (40%), and blood transfusion (53%) were more likely in children with an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted; 25 children required all three interventions, 3 (12%) were hypotensive at presentation, 15 (60%) had an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (P < .001). CONCLUSION: An increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted is superior to age-adjusted hypotension to identify injured children likely to require emergency operation, endotracheal intubation, or early blood transfusion.
BACKGROUND: We demonstrated previously that shock index, pediatric age-adjusted identifies severely injured children accurately after blunt trauma. We hypothesized that an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted would identify more accurately injured children requiring the highest trauma team activation than age-adjusted hypotension. METHODS: We reviewed all children age 4-16 admitted after blunt trauma with an injury severity score ≥15 from January 2007-June 2013. Criteria used as indicators of need for activation of the trauma team included blood transfusion, emergency operation, or endotracheal intubation within 24 hours of admission. Shock index, pediatric age-adjusted represents maximum normal shock index based on age. Cutoffs included shock index >1.22 (ages 4-6), >1.0 (7-12), and >0.9 (13-16). Age-adjusted cutoffs for hypotension were as follows: systolic blood pressure <90 (ages 4-6), systolic blood pressure <100 (7-16). RESULTS: A total of 559 children were included; 21% underwent operation, 37% endotracheal intubation, and 14% transfusion. Hypotension alone predicted poorly the need for operation (13%), endotracheal intubation (17%), or transfusion (22%). Operation (30%), endotracheal intubation (40%), and blood transfusion (53%) were more likely in children with an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted; 25 children required all three interventions, 3 (12%) were hypotensive at presentation, 15 (60%) had an increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted (P < .001). CONCLUSION: An increased shock index, pediatric age-adjusted is superior to age-adjusted hypotension to identify injured children likely to require emergency operation, endotracheal intubation, or early blood transfusion.
Authors: Jeannie L Callum; Calvin H Yeh; Andrew Petrosoniak; Mark J McVey; Stephanie Cope; Troy Thompson; Victoria Chin; Keyvan Karkouti; Avery B Nathens; Kimmo Murto; Suzanne Beno; Jacob Pendergrast; Andrew McDonald; Russell MacDonald; Neill K J Adhikari; Asim Alam; Donald Arnold; Lee Barratt; Andrew Beckett; Sue Brenneman; Hina Razzaq Chaudhry; Allison Collins; Margaret Harvey; Jacinthe Lampron; Clarita Margarido; Amanda McFarlan; Barto Nascimento; Wendy Owens; Menaka Pai; Sandro Rizoli; Theodora Ruijs; Robert Skeate; Teresa Skelton; Michelle Sholzberg; Kelly Syer; Jami-Lynn Viveiros; Josee Theriault; Alan Tinmouth; Rardi Van Heest; Susan White; Michelle Zeller; Katerina Pavenski Journal: CMAJ Open Date: 2019-09-03
Authors: Christian Waydhas; Markus Baake; Lars Becker; Boris Buck; Helena Düsing; Björn Heindl; Kai Oliver Jensen; Rolf Lefering; Carsten Mand; T Paffrath; Uwe Schweigkofler; Kai Sprengel; Heiko Trentzsch; Bernd Wohlrath; Dan Bieler Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Matthew C Hernandez; Michael Traynor; John L Bruce; Wanda Bekker; Grant L Laing; Johnathon M Aho; Victor Y Kong; Denise B Klinkner; Martin D Zielinski; Damian L Clarke Journal: World J Surg Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Christina M Theodorou; Laura A Galganski; Gregory J Jurkovich; Diana L Farmer; Shinjiro Hirose; Jacob T Stephenson; A Francois Trappey Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 3.697
Authors: Christina M Theodorou; A Francois Trappey; Carl A Beyer; Kaeli J Yamashiro; Shinjiro Hirose; Joseph M Galante; Alana L Beres; Jacob T Stephenson Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2020-09-22 Impact factor: 2.549
Authors: Emily C Alberto; Elise McKenna; Michael J Amberson; Jun Tashiro; Katie Donnelly; Arunachalam A Thenappan; Peyton E Tempel; Adesh S Ranganna; Susan Keller; Ivan Marsic; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Karen J O'Connell; Randall S Burd Journal: Injury Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 2.687